本文自社會運動的理述及判準出發，論證統╱獨的社會的動作之“社會反運動”性質；在檢討對反統攝運動的理解、在確認「與統攝無涉的非體制性」作為社會運動特質之基礎上 說明統╱獨兩造的同質性，以及它們在運動上所表現的不徹底性、投機性、作秀性。 　其次，文章回顧了序列共和的論詰及其在歐亞諸國的史程，辨別了共和想像有異於朝代模板與革命教條之處，也解構了對「第二共和」產生恐慌的統╱獨兩造間之同益性與共犯構造。 　針對統╱獨奕局中兩邊統治者圖利彼此的利益交換，本文嘗試提出對第二共和進行人民性的╱自主的解讀、發聲與運動之可能。

　　　　　The paper reviews the history of social activities effectuated by both the independentist and unificationist camps in the past decades in terms of theorization and criteria established from new social movements. It argues that those social activities are of the nature of social anti-movement. Carried out halfheartedly, those activities were only showpieces and gestures in service of their respective stateist agenda. Judging from the paranoid reactions of both camps toward the discourse on "the second republic", the paper futher identifies the structure of common-interests and accomplice-relationships shared by both the independentists and the unificationists, as self-aspired power-seekers as well as self-assigned future ruling elite. To break away from such predicaments, the paper suggests the possibility of an alternative reading and voicing of "the second republic" idea, from the perspective of societal self-defense and from praxis of genuine social movements.