臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：運動訓練與性別對學童不同感覺形式辨識能力之影響
書刊名：大專體育學刊
作者：劉強 引用關係／葉志仙 引用關係／劉雅甄 引用關係／陳全壽
作者(外文)：Liu, Chiang／Ye, Chih-shien／Liu, Ya-chen／Chen, Chun-show
出版日期：2000
卷期：2:2
頁次：頁37-47
主題關鍵詞：感覺形式；辨識能力；運動訓練；陳氏手眼協調選擇反應器；Sensory modality；Discriminative ability；Sports training；Chen's hand-eye coordination recognition reaction test
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:31
視、聽、觸等感覺形式(sensory modalities)有不同的訊息接收能力與辨識能力，這些能力會間接或直接到個體在活動上的表現。本研究透過陳全壽博士所設計之陳氏手眼協調選擇反應器為工具，利用重覆量數（即受試者內設計）的實驗設計方式，讓六十位平均11.08±0.34歲之有無運動訓練經歷的國小五年級男、女學童，分吸以視覺、觸覺以及視覺結合觸覺等不同感覺形式，進行正方形、三角形、圓形等形態的辨識，以比較有無運動訓練經歷與不同性別之國小五年級學童不同感覺形式辨識能力的差異，以及非慣用手與慣用手間不同感覺形式辨識能力的差異；並以2x3混合設計二因子變異數分析、LSD事後比較法與相依樣本t考驗等統計方法進行分析。研究結果發現，國小五年級學童不同感覺形式辦識能力不受運動訓練與性別之影響；此外，除了雙手所進行之視覺與視覺結合觸覺辨識能力間無顯著的差異外(P>0.5)，其餘在非慣用手、慣用手、雙手所進行之視覺結合觸覺辨識能力均顯著優於視覺與觸覺辦識能力，而且視覺辦識能力又顯著優於觸覺辨識能力(p<.05)。同時，慣用手的觸覺辨識能力顯著優於非慣用手(p<.05)；在視覺結合觸覺以及的視覺辨識能力上，非慣用手與慣用手則無顯著的差異(p>.05)。
Sensory modalities (e.g., vision, auditory, tactile) could have different abilities of gain information and discrimination which maybe influence on performance of physical fitness. The purpose of this study was try to compare children with and without sports training experience, between gender and between domination hand and non-domination hand on discriminative ability by different sensory modalities. The repeated measure of experimental design was used, and sixty mean age of 11.08 years old elementary school students participated in this study voluntarily. Each subject was to test Chen’s hand-eye coordination recognition reaction that designed by Dr, Chun-Show Chen to collected data including discriminative ability by visual (V), tactual (T) and combated visual and tactual (V-T). The results were analyzed by 2X3 mixed design two-way ANOVA which indicated that sports training experience and gender didn’t influence on fifth-grades students of discriminative ability by different sensory modalities (p>0.5), but advanced analysis by LSD’s method of posterior comparison which indicated that discriminative ability by V-T was the best among by V and T (p<0.20, and discriminative ability by V was better than by T on the each hand (p<.05), in addition to those finding above there was no significant difference between V-T and V on the both –hand test. The results by repeated measures t-test which indicated that domination h and superior to non-domination hand on discriminative ability by T (p<.05), there was no significant difference between domination hand and another hand (p>.05).
期刊論文
1.Syoichi, Iwasaki、Takehito, Kaiho、Ken, Iseki(1995)。Handedness trends across age groups in a Japanese sample of 2316。Perceptual and Motor Skills，80，979-994。  new window
2.洪清一(19980600)。知覺-動作歷程、評量與訓練方案之探究。花蓮師院學報，8，339+341-377+379。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Adams, J. O.、Duda, P. D.(1986)。Laterality of cross-modal spatial processing。Cortex，22(4)，539-552。  new window
4.Brynat, P. E.、Raz, L.(1975)。Visual and tactual perception of shape by young children。Developmental Psychology，11(4)，525-526。  new window
5.Cronin, V.(1973)。Cross-modal and intramodal visual and tactual matching in young children。Developmental Psychology，8(3)，336-340。  new window
6.Cronin, V.(1982)。Children's performance on two tasks of visual and tactual discrimination。Journal of the Association for the Study of Perception，17(1)，5-18。  new window
7.Heller, M. A.(1982)。Visual and tactual texture perception: Intersensory cooperation。Perception & Psychophysics，31(4)，339-344。  new window
8.Kinney, J. A. A.、Luria, S. M.(1970)。Conflicting visual and tactual-kinesthetic stimulation。Perception & Psychophysics，8，189-192。  new window
9.Lin, Z.、Han, K.(1984)。Discrimination of size by sight and touch in adults。Information on Psychological Sciences，4，1-4。  new window
10.Marks, L. E.(1978)。Multimodal Perception。Handbook of perception，8，321-339。  new window
11.Mavlov, L.、Minchev, B.(1980)。Matching spatial patterns within and between passive touch and vision。Acta Physiological Pharmacology of Bulgarian，6(1)，34-40。  new window
12.Mcmorris, T.、Morris, P.、Dunstall, L.(1991)。Response times of anglers and non-anglers to visual and tactile stimuli: a preliminary investigation。British Journal of Physical Education，9。  new window
13.Milner, B.、Taylor, L.(1972)。Right-hemisphere superiority in tactile pattern-recognition after cerebral commissurotomy: evidence for nonverbal memory。Neuropsychologia，10(1)，1-15。  new window
14.Rock, I.、Victor, J.(1964)。Vision and touch: an experimentally create conflict between the sense。Science，143，594-596。  new window
15.Schultz, L. M.、Petersik, J. T.(1994)。Visual-haptic relations in a two-dimensional size-matching task。Perceptual and Motor Skills，78(2)，395-402。  new window
研究報告
1.陳全壽(1997)。由性差、地域差看兒童大肌肉活動能力、小肌肉活動能力、學科學習能力的發達傾向及相關。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.卓淑玲(1986)。觸覺與系列性視覺之形狀偵測機制研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳淑枝(1996)。不同運動項目選手之手眼、腳眼及全身協調反應能力之探討(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.張鳳儀(1999)。澎湖地區國小五年級學童基本運動能力與學科學習能力之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳仁政(1996)。從人類感覺特性探討盲人人因設計之研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Neisser, U.(1967)。Cognitive psychology。New York：Appleton。  new window
2.Revesz, G.(1950)。Psychology and art of the blind。Toronto：Longmans。  new window
單篇論文
1.Abravanel, E.(1973)。The companion roles of touching and viewing for shape discrimination by young children(No. ED 058949)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Vallbo, A.、Johansson, R.(1978)。The tactile sensory innervation of the glabrius skill of the human hand。Active Touch。Elmsford, New York：Pergamon。  new window
2.Witelson, S. F.(1980)。Neuroanatomical asymmetry in left handers: A review and implications for functional asymmetry。Neuropsychology of left-handedness。New York：Academic。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：897（臺灣：886，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2602775 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68413613
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上