臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：安樂死問題初探
書刊名：臺東師院學報
作者：陳明進
作者(外文)：Chen, Ming-jinn
出版日期：2001
卷期：12(上)
頁次：頁211-241
主題關鍵詞：機能健全；機能不健全；安樂死；醫師助人自殺；積極安樂死；消極安樂死；Competent；Incompetent；Euthanasia；Physician-assisted suicide；Active euthanasia；Passive euthanasia
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:427
　　　　　在世人的關切和注意下，今年四月荷蘭終於完成立法程序，成為世界上第一個允許 安樂死(Euthanasia)和醫師助人自殺(Physician—Assisted Suicide)的國家。然而，法案的通過並未 止息各界的爭議，因為生命的價值是無可替代的，任何錯誤的決定，勢必造成無可彌補的缺 憾。因此，在保護生命權的前提下，兼顧患者不可忍受的病痛折磨，在當事人意識清醒、機 能健全的情況下，尊重患者對生命的提擇，應是較為穩健可行的方案。本文擬分析美國、荷 蘭和其他國家學者的觀點，並且討相關個案，截長補短，取精用宏，容或對我們處理安樂死 問題有所助益。
　　　　　 Under the concern and focus of the world, in April this year Dutch eventually complete the process of legislation, Dutch becomes the first nation to permit euthanasia and physician assisted suicide in the world. However, the pass of htte Act has not stop the controversy from the outside world, because the value of life cab not be replaced, any mistaken decision can become irrememedial regret. Therefore, foe the premise of protecting the right to live, and caring the unbearable suffering of the patient, respecting the patient's choice about life should the better possible way, when the patient still conscious and competent. This paper intends to analyze the scholar's popints of view from America, Holland and other countries, and it also surveys the relative cases by using the merits and making up the shortages, in this way it can help us to deal with the issues of euthanasia.
期刊論文
1.Rawls, John(1985)。Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical。Philosophy and Public Affairs，14(3)，223-251。  new window
2.(2000)。荷蘭將完成安樂死立法。民生報。  延伸查詢new window
3.American Medical Association Council on Ethnical and Judicial Affairs(1992)。Decisions Near the End of Life。JAMA，267(16)，2229-2233。  new window
4.Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition。A Definition of Irreversible Coma。The Journal of the American Medical Association，205，337-340。  new window
5.Brock, Dan W.(1999)。A Critique of the Objective to Physician-Assisted Suicide。Ethics，109(3)，1-20。  new window
6.Buchanan, Allen(1979)。Medical Paternalism or Legal Imperialism: Not the Only Alternatives for handling Saikewicz-Type Case。American Journal of Law and Medicine，5。  new window
7.Meisel, Allen(1991)。Leagal Myths about Terminating Life Support。Archives of Internal Medicine，151(8)，1497-1502。  new window
8.Ryan, Kenneth J.(1986)。Tradition and Change in the Teaching of Bioethics: Observations from the Field。Harvard Medical Alumni Bulletin，60，25-27。  new window
9.Sprug, C. L.(1990)。Cnanging Attitudes and Practices in Forgoing Life-Sustaining Treatments。The Journal of the American Medical Association，2213。  new window
10.Travis, Terry(1974)。The Attitudees of Physicians toward Prolongation of Life。International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine，5，17-26。  new window
圖書
1.Rawls, J.(1972)。Theory of Justice。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
2.吳鏘亮(2000)。腦死和器官移植。天使的眼睛。花蓮。  延伸查詢new window
3.姚克明、林豐雄、廖清雲、張袽文(1980)。法律界人士對安樂死的看法之研究。法律界人士對安樂死的看法之研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.Emanuel, Ezekeil J.(1999)。臨終之醫療倫理。臨終之醫療倫理。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳文憲(2000)。一位基督徒對安樂死合法化的看法。天使的眼睛。花蓮。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃勝雄(2000)。醫生的誓約與醫學倫理。天使的眼睛。花蓮。  延伸查詢new window
7.詹弘廷(2000)。「植物人狀態」的觀念與倫理爭議。天使的眼睛。花蓮。  延伸查詢new window
8.Kastenbaum, Robert。死亡心理學。死亡心理學。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.Anqell, Marcia(1992)。Euthanasia。Social Ethics-Morality and Social Policy。New York。  new window
10.Admiraal, Peter(1996)。Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide。Birth to Death-Science and Bioethics。Cambridge。  new window
11.Battin, Margaret(1998)。The Way We Do It, The Way They Do It。Applied Ethics。Oxford。  new window
12.Brock, Dan W.(2000)。Voluntary Active Euthanasia。Intervention and Reflection-Basic Issues in Medical Ethics。  new window
13.Callaham, Daniel(1987)。Setting Limits。Setting Limits。New York。  new window
14.Callaham, Daniel(2000)。When Self-Determination Runs Amock。Intervention and Reflection-Basic Issues in Medical Ethics。  new window
15.May, Larry、Collins-Chobanian、Wong, Kai-Cheng(1998)。Applied Ethics-An Multicultural Approach。Applied Ethics-An Multicultural Approach。Upper Saddle River, Nersey。  new window
16.Miles, S. Gomez(1988)。Protocols for Elective Use of Life-Sustaining Teeatment。Protocols for Elective Use of Life-Sustaining Teeatment。New York。  new window
17.Munson, Ronald(2000)。Intervention and Reflection-Basic Issues in Medical Ethics。Intervention and Reflection-Basic Issues in Medical Ethics。  new window
18.Potts, Stephen G.(1992)。Objections to the Institutionalization of Ethanasia。Social Ethics-Morality and Social Policy。New York。  new window
19.(1982)。President’s Commission the Study of Ethical Problem in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, making health Care Decisions(vol. 1)。President’s Commission the Study of Ethical Problem in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, making health Care Decisions(vol. 1)。Washington, D. C.。  new window
20.Rachel, James(1992)。Active and Passive Euthanasia。Social Ethics-Morality and Social Policy。New York。  new window
21.Rachel, James(1992)。More Important Distinctions and A Defense of Active Euthanasia。Social Ethics-Morality and Social Policy。New York。  new window
22.Rawls, John(1982)。Social Utility and Primary Goods。Utilitarialism and Beyond。  new window
23.Rehnquist, William H.(1992)。Majority Opinion in Cruzan V. Director, Missouri Department of Health。Social Ethics-Morality and Social Policy。New York。  new window
24.Rosenbaum, Ernest H.(1975)。Living with Cancer。Living with Cancer。New York。  new window
25.Sherwin, Susan(1998)。Gender, Race, and Class in the Delivery of Health Care。Applied Ethics-An Multicultural Approach。Upper Saddle River, Nersey。  new window
26.Steinbock, Bonnie(1998)。The Intentional Termination of Life。Applied Ethics-An Multicultural Approach。Upper Saddle River, Nersey。  new window
27.Stoddard, Sandol(2000)。Terminal, But Not Hopeless。Intervention and Reflection-Basic Issues in Medical Ethics。  new window
28.Sullivan, Thomas(1992)。Active and Passive Euthanasia: An Important Distinction。Social Ethics-Morality and Social Policy。New York。  new window
29.Supreme Court of New Jersey(2000)。In the Matter of Karen Quinlan, and Alleged Incompetent。Intervention and Reflection-Basic Issues in Medical Ethics。  new window
30.Thomasma, David C.、Kushner, Thomasine(1996)。Birth to Death-Science and Bioethics。Birth to Death-Science and Bioethics。Cambridge。  new window
其他
1.(2001)。荷蘭通過安樂死，各國反應負面居多，臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2001)。全球首例：荷蘭安樂死合法化，臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(2001)。Netherlands Euthanasia Law Fires Intensive Debate，Taipei。  new window
4.(2001)。Dutch Leagalise Euthanasia。  new window
5.(2001)。Euthanasia more sparks peotests。  new window
6.(2001)。Dutch law Stokes Death Debate。  new window
7.(2000)。Dutch Becoming First Nation to Leagalize Assisted Suicide，New York。  new window
8.(1999)。Dtuch Opposition up in Arms over Euthanasia Bill。  new window
9.Simons, Marlise(2000)。Dutch Becoming First Nation to Legalize Assisted Suicide，New York。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：551（臺灣：536，外國：15） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2393369 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68199732
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上