本文寫作的目的在於引希臘哲學家齊諾的一項理辯為例證，對照於中國先名家之說，加以說明，以顯明中西形上思想觀點之不同。全文分作四節： 一、引齊諾之說，並說明其義。 二、指出齊諾此一理辯的問題關鍵。 三、引先秦中國哲學中墨家與名家之說，與齊諾所提出之理辯相對照，說法雖不同而哲學問題實證相同。 四、引名家之說，以見中國哲學對齊諾的問題所提出的解說。此最後一節也即是本論文的結論。

　　　　　The aim of this paper is to highlight the difference between viewpoints of Chinese and Western metaphysics by contrasting the discourse of the ancient Chinese Logician School with a dialectic raised by Zeno. The paper is divided into four sections: Section 1 describes and explains Zeno's dialectic. Section 2 presents the key issue of the dialectic in question. Section 3 makes a contrast between Zeno's dialectic and the discourses of Mo School and the Logicians of pre-Chin Chinese philosophy, then claims that both parties in fact face the same philosophical problem, although articulated differently. Section 4, the conclusion, provides the Logician discourse as an account for Zeno's puzzle by Chinese philosophers.