:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:兩岸土地開發制度與城市競爭力關係之探討
書刊名:臺灣土地研究
作者:金家禾 引用關係
作者(外文):Ching, Chia-ho
出版日期:2001
卷期:2
頁次:頁73-100
主題關鍵詞:土地開發競爭力土地開發制度Land developmentCompetitivenessLand development institutions
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:43
提升城市競爭力之議題於全球化趨勢下漸受重視,土地開發供應各種都市活動所需用地及空間,故其有可能與城市競爭力間具有密切之關係,甚至是影響競爭力之重要因素,然而土地開發受開發體制之影響與限制,所以城市競爭力與土地開發體制間亦可能具有密切之關係,本文透過對土地開發過程相關制度因素之分析,並對具有跨越海峽兩岸不同制度不同城市土地開發經驗之土地開發業者進行訪談調查,以分析及檢視土地開發與提升城市競爭力間互動之關係,結論為土地開發體制確實影響競爭力之提升,土地開發成效並可作為評定城市競爭力之一項指標。為提升競爭力,城市政府有必要認真地分析與檢討其土地開發體制,並對影響土地開發效率之因素(或障礙根源),加以調整改善,以促使土地開發之有效進行。
How to promote a city's competitiveness has become an important issue under the pressure of globalization. As the space needed by various social and economic activities is mainly relied on developers' investment decisions in land development projects, the ability to sustain a city's attractiveness to land developments may demonstrate its competitiveness. Further, the activities or operations of land development within a city are influenced and constrained by the city's institutional configurations. Thus, there may have a strong connection between a city's competitiveness and its institutional elements in property development. This paper examines this possible connection by analyzing and comparing relative institutional elements in the development process in different localities. These elements include: the pattern of property ownership; planning or land use management regulations; the city government's interventions in the property market; and the networks of local property development industry. The comparison is undertaking by a survey of land developers, who have various land evelopmental experiments in different cities between Taiwan and China where the institutional environments for land development are quite different. The study concludes that a city's institutional configurations in land development are essential elements for promoting its competitiveness, and its attractiveness to land developments can be used as an indicator for its competitiveness. Furthermore, in order to enlarge its competitiveness, there is a need for a city government to examine honestly its land development institutions. Through this effort, the obstacles that constrain the operations of land development can be found out. Further endeavors are required in modifying these institutional deficiencies in order to promote the efficiency of land development and the quality of development outcomes.
期刊論文
1.Porter, M. E.(1995)。The Competitive Advantage of the Inner City。Harvard Business Review,73(3),55-71。  new window
2.D'Arcy, E.、Keogh, G.(1997)。Towards a Property Market Paradigm of Urban Change。Environment and Planning, A,29,685-706。  new window
3.Ricci, L. A.(1999)。Economic Geography and Comparative Advantage: Agglomeration versus Specialization。European Economic Review,43,357-377。  new window
4.Oi, Jean C.(1995)。The Role of the Local State in China's Transitional Economy。The China Quarterly,144(12),1132-1149。  new window
5.Naughton, Barry(19940500)。Chinese Institutional Innovation and Privatization from Below。The American Economic Review,84(2),266-270。  new window
6.Begg, Iain(1999)。Cities and Competitiveness。Urban Studies,36(5/6),795-810。  new window
7.Lever, William F.、Turok, Ivan(1999)。Competitive Cities: Introduction to the Review。Urban Studies--An International Journal for Research in Urban and Regional Studies,36(5/6),791-793。  new window
8.Walder, Andrew G.(1995)。Local Governments as Industrial Firms: An Organizational Analysis of China's Transitional Economy。American Journal of Sociology,101(2),263-301。  new window
9.Healey, P.(1994)。Urban policy and property development: The institutional relations of real-estate development in an old industrial regions。Environment and Planning, A,26,177-198。  new window
10.Thornton, E.(1995)。Asian Infrastructure: Big, Bigger and Biggest。Far Eastern Economic Review,37-44。  new window
11.Peck, F. W.(1996)。Regional Development and the Production of Space: The Role of Infrastructure in the Attraction of New Inward Investment。Environment and Planning, A,28,327-339。  new window
12.Zhu, Jieming、Zhu, J. M.(1999)。Local Growth Coalition: The Context and Implications of China's Gradualist Urban Land Reforms。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,23(3),534-548。  new window
13.林初昇、Lin, G. C. S.(1999)。State policy and Spatial restructuring in post-reform China, 1978-95。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,23(4),670-696。  new window
14.Cheshire, P. C.、Gordon, I. R.(1996)。Territorial Competition and the Logic of Collective (In)action。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,20,383-399。  new window
15.许绍基(1996)。开发成本高税负担重-广州开发商呼吁「减肥」。中外房地产导报,21,6-13。  延伸查詢new window
16.Zhang, Xing-Quan(1997)。Urban Land Reform in China。Land Use Policy,14(3),187-199。  new window
17.Zhu, Jiemin(1994)。Changing Land Policy and Its Impacts on Local Growth: The Experience of the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone, China, in the 1980s。Urban Studies,31(10),1611-1623。  new window
18.Boyne, G. A.(1996)。Competition and Local Government: A Public Choice Perspective。Urban Studies,33(4/ 5),703-721。  new window
19.Halia, A.(1999)。City Building in the East and West。Cities,16(4),259-267。  new window
20.Jiang, Dian-Chun、Chen, Jing-Han、Isaac, D.(1998)。The Effect of Foreign Investment on the Real Estate Industry in China。Urban Studies,35(11),2101-2110。  new window
21.D'Arcy, E.、Keogh, G.(1999)。The Property Market and Urban Competition: A Review。Urban Studies,36(5/ 6),917-928。  new window
22.(1997)。Market Potential, Investment Climate。Far Eastern Economic Review,August。  new window
23.Garba, S. B.、Al-Mubaiyedh, S.(1999)。An Assessment Framework for Public Urban Land Management。Land Use Policy,16,269-279。  new window
24.Stewart, M.(1996)。Competition and Competitiveness in Urban Policy。Public Money and Management,16,21-26。  new window
會議論文
1.Gordon, I. R.、Cheshire, P. C.(1998)。Locational advantage and the lessons of territorial competition in Europe。Uddevalla, Sweden。  new window
研究報告
1.國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所、中國土地經濟學會(1999)。臺北縣都市計畫工業區土地使用現況調查。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Castells, Manuel(1996)。The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture Symbol, The Rise of Network Society。Oxford:Blackwells。  new window
2.Porter, Michael E.(1998)。The Competitive Advantage of Nations。London:Macmillan Press。  new window
3.Kantor, P.、David, S.(1988)。The Dependent City。The Dependent City。London, UK。  new window
4.Sassen, S.(1995)。Urban Impacts of Economic Globalisation。Cities in Competition。Melbourne, Australia。  new window
5.Rose, J.(1994)。The Role of Philosophy and Politics in Urban Development and Control。Land Management: New Directions。New York, NY。  new window
6.Perry, M.(1986)。Small Factories and Economic Development。Aldershot, UK:Gower。  new window
7.林文玲(1992)。左擁資金、右抱土地。土地、財團、選舉。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.(1997)。European Cities in Competition。European Cities in Competition。Aldershot, UK。  new window
9.楊重光(1996)。城市土地管理與可持續發展。城市土地管理與可持續發展。北京。  延伸查詢new window
10.Fothergill, S.、Monk, S.、Perry, M.(1987)。Property and Industrial Development。London, UK:Hutchinson。  new window
圖書論文
1.Amin, Ash、Thrift, Nigel(1995)。Globalisation, Institutional Thickness and the Local Economy。Managing Cities: The New Urban Context。London:John Wiley and Sons。  new window
2.Hall, P.(1995)。Towards a General Urban Theory。Cities in Competition: Productive and Sustainable Cities for the 21st Century。Longman。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE