存在學對於人類存在而言，乃具有一最基礎的地位；但由於過往的存在學說仍陷於各國歷史文化傳統與語言的獨有情境中；是以存有學一直未能建構具有共識，亦即最具後設基礎的共同語言及敘想方式。 進入二十一紀紀的後現代語境中，學界對於共識的可能已可以尋求"多元共構"的途徑，而不再營造獨一的體系；也就是我們將不再使用黑格爾式或朱熹式的特殊歷史語言情境下所發展的單一語彙，而是去尋求多元共識的存有學而建構。終乃可使人類存在具同共且最終的後設基礎。而這個多元共識的存在學基礎也是我們賴以去解開臺灣社會中意識型態，型態對立的可能關鍵。

Otologyis the foundation for human being; but it fall in to a trop individual historical and situation in the past, so ontology still can't arrive a common view. Besides, it can't reach a common language and thinking mode of post-setting foundation. The academic circle can make a common view to search "diverse establishment" but not conduct a single-handed system in post-modem language situation in 21 century. In other word, we will not use the vocabulary of Hegel or Zhu-she that develop under a special situation any more, and we should search the diverse common view to construct ontology. The human being will possess the foundation of post-setting. And this is the key to solve the opposing consciousness in Taiwan.