:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:《唐詩別裁集》與《古今詩刪》中「唐詩選」的比較研究--論沈德潛對李攀龍詩學理念的傳承與批判
書刊名:漢學研究
作者:陳岸峰
作者(外文):Chan, Ngon Fung
出版日期:2001
卷期:19:2=39
頁次:頁399-416
主題關鍵詞:沈德潛唐詩別裁集李攀龍古今詩刪現代復古詩派唐詩Shen deqianTangshi biecai jiLi panlongGujin shishanMing Neo-classical schoolTang poetry
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:69
     一般文學批評史與文學史均將清代格調派宗師沈德潛視為明代復古詩派的繼承者,然而卻極少具體地對沈氏與復古詩派在詩學上的關係作一具體深入的論析。故此,本文集中論述沈氏所編選的《唐詩別裁集》,與後世從明代後七子領袖李攀龍所編選的《古今詩刪》中的唐詩部分,作比較研究,藉以勾勒出沈氏對李氏詩學理念上的傳承與批判。
     Shen Deqian 沈德潛 (1673-1769) was regarded as a successor of the Ming Neo-classical School by most of the scholars of literary criticism and literary history. However, none of them had concretely explored the poetic relationship of Shen and Ming Neo-classical School. In this essay, we will focus on discussing the relationship between Shen's Tangshi biecai ji 唐詩別裁集 and Li Panlong's 李攀龍 selection of Tang poetry in his controversial Poetic anthropology Gujin shishan 古今詩刪, as a comparative study of several controversial poetic concepts from the late Ming to early Qing. Through this study, Shen's reception and critique on Li Panlung's poetic theory is expected to be clearly analyzed and clarified.
圖書
1.蔡景康(1993)。明代文論選。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄔國平、王鎮遠(1995)。清代文學批評史。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.李攀龍、包敬第(1992)。滄溟先生集。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.永瑢、紀昀(1987)。四庫全書總目。北京:上海:中華書局:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.胡應麟(1962)。詩藪。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.張廷玉(1974)。明史。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.楊松年(1987)。李攀龍及其《古今詩刪》研究。中國古典文學批評論集。香港。  延伸查詢new window
8.孫琴安(1989)。唐七律詩精評。唐七律詩精評。上海。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)沈德潛(1977)。唐詩別裁集,香港。  延伸查詢new window
2.(明)李夢陽(1991)。空同集,上海。  延伸查詢new window
3.(清)葉燮(1998)。原詩。  延伸查詢new window
4.(明)康海(1972)。對山集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.(明)王夫之(1982)。清詩話,上海。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top