臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：Simile and Metaphor: Seemingly Similar
書刊名：大葉學報
作者：謝健雄 引用關係
作者(外文)：Shie, Jian-shiung
出版日期：2001
卷期：10:2
頁次：頁61-67
主題關鍵詞：明喻；隱喻；喻體；喻依；喻詞；Simile；Metaphor；Theme；Vehicle；Comparison marker
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:131
　　　　　明喻和隱喻是英語裡最常見的兩個修辭格，本文旨在探討此二修辭格之異同。雖然明喻和隱喻均屬譬喻辭，且皆可延伸達數句之長度，作者將提出並說明其二者間類推性質之相當差異。隱喻之喻體和喻依通常較明喻隱蔽。明喻喻體和喻依之類似點一般較隱喻明顯。明喻一定含有喻詞，而隱喻一定沒有喻詞。隱喻是一點或一段英語文，而明喻均由一個句子或子句表達之。隱喻語用上認定喻依即為喻體，而明喻將喻依比擬為喻體。明喻全為詞句本意之運用，而隱喻則不全是。由於上述明喻和隱喻之異質性，作者建議將英語的明喻和隱喻列為兩種修辭格，而不同於若干學者將其合為同一種修辭格。
　　　　　This paper explores the similarities and differences between simile and metaphor, the two most common figures of speech in English. Conceded that simile and metaphor are both a figure of comparison which may be extended over a number of sentences, it will be seen in this paper that they differ greatly in their analogical constitution. The metaphoric theme and vehicle are usually more covert than those of a simile. The analogical ground of a simile is normally more explicit than that of a metaphor. A simile always contains a comparison marker, which, by contrast, is invariably absent from a metaphoric expression. In addition, a metaphor is encoded via a segment of discourse, while a simile via a sentence/clause. The metaphoric predication identifies the theme with the vehicle, whereas the simile likens the two. Finally, literal though a simile is, a metaphoric expression always involves nonliteral use of language. In view of all the divergences, this paper suggests that simile and metaphor be treated as two distinct figures rather than being lumped together as one single type of figure of speech.
期刊論文
1.謝健雄(20010600)。English Metaphoric Expressions from the Point of View of Language Teaching。文史學報（中興大學），31，177-197。new window  new window
2.Aisenman, R. A.(1999)。Structure-Mapping and the Simile0Metaphor Preference。Metaphor and Symbol，14(1)，45-51。  new window
3.Chen, Rong(1993)。Conversational Implicature and Poetic Metaphor。Language and Literature，18，53-74。  new window
4.Kennedy, J. M.、Chiappe, D. L.(1999)。What makees a metaphor stronger than a simile?。Metaphor and Symbol，14(1)，63-69。  new window
5.Kreuz, R. J.、Roberts, R. M.(1993)。The Empirical Study of Figurative Language。Poetics，22(1/2)，151-169。  new window
圖書
1.Davies, P.(1983)。Success with Words: A Guide to Modern English Usage。Success with Words: A Guide to Modern English Usage。New York, NY。  new window
2.Leech, Geoffrey N.(1969)。A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry。Longman。  new window
3.Wales, Katie(1989)。A Dictionary of Stylistics。Longman。  new window
4.Jack C. Richards、John Platt、Heidi Platt(1992)。Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics。Longman。  new window
5.Hatch, E.、Brown, C.(1995)。Vocabulary, semantics, and language education。New York：Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Levinson, Stephen C.(1983)。Pragmatics。Cambridge。  new window
7.Glucksberg, S.、Keysar, B.(1993)。How Metaphors Work。Metaphor and Thought。Cambridge/New York。  new window
8.Aristotle(1954)。Rhetoric(book III)。Rhetoric(book III)。New York, NY。  new window
9.Arp, T. R.(1998)。Perrine’s Literature: Structure, Sound, and Sense。Perrine’s Literature: Structure, Sound, and Sense。Forth Worth, TX.。  new window
10.Baker-Gonzalez, J.、Blau, Eileen K.(1999)。Building on Basics: A Thematic Approach to Reading Comprehension。Building on Basics: A Thematic Approach to Reading Comprehension。White Plains, NY。  new window
11.Baker, S.(1991)。The Practical stylist。The Practical stylist。New York。  new window
12.Booth, W. C.(1979)。Metaphor as Rhetoric: The Problem of Evaluation。On Metaphor。Chicago。  new window
13.Burkhardt, A.(1990)。Searle on Metaphor。Speech Acts, Meaning and Intentions。Berlin。  new window
14.Cooper, D. E.(1986)。Metaphor。Metaphor。oxford。  new window
15.Davidson, Donald(1985)。What Metaphors Mean。The Philosophy of Language。Oxford。  new window
16.Hawkes, T.(1970)。Metaphor。Metaphor。London。  new window
17.Jeffries, L.(1966)。What Makes English into Art?。Using English: From Conversation to Canon。London。  new window
18.Kirwan, J.(1990)。Literature, Rhetoric, Metaphysics: Literary Theory and Literary Aesthetics。Literature, Rhetoric, Metaphysics: Literary Theory and Literary Aesthetics。London。  new window
19.Morgan, J. L.(1979)。Observations on the Pragmatics of Metaphor。Metaphor and Thought。Cambridge/New York。  new window
20.Stillman, F.(1966)。The Poet’s manual and Rhyming Dictionary。The Poet’s manual and Rhyming Dictionary。London。  new window
21.Thorne, S.(1997)。Mastering Advanced English Language。Mastering Advanced English Language。London。  new window
22.Tien, W.(2000)。English(3)。English(3)。Taipei。  new window
23.Wheelwright, P.(1962)。Metaphor and Reality。Metaphor and Reality。Bloomington。  new window
圖書論文
1.Ortony, A.(1993)。The role of similarity in similes and metaphors。Metaphor and thought。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Miller, G. A.(1979)。Images and models, similes and metaphors。Metaphor and thought。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：582（臺灣：581，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2581353 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68378882
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上