:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣現代陶藝體制源起
書刊名:現代美術學報
作者:謝東山
作者(外文):Hsieh, Tungshan
出版日期:2001
卷期:4
頁次:頁187-224
主題關鍵詞:臺灣現代陶藝
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:19
本文指在探討臺灣地區現代陶藝領馨起源與形成過程,並試圖找出形塑該領域的社會動力。本文的基本假設前提是:陶藝屬於一種文化生產領域,它的實踐需要某些有形的社會體制,以及無形的意義與價值之建構機制,如此才能有效運作,並取得社會正當性。 根據美國人類學者史徒華(Julian H. Steward, 1902-1972)的文化變遷理論,任何地區文化的發展與變遷都是多線演化的結果。據此,我們相信,作為一種文化實踐,現代陶藝自然也不會是一種單線演化的成果。本文因此認定,臺灣現代藝之所以不同於其他地區的發展樣式,尤其是現代陶藝的起源—美國,這是因為臺灣現代陶藝有其特有的演化基礎與脈絡。臺灣藝並非一開始就是純藝術(pure arts)的一個類型(genre),而是最早由宮廷分化而成的,然後逐漸轉化為唯美陶;因此,唯美成為臺灣最早的「陶藝」觀念的原型,時間在1970年代後期。 真正的,以現代主義為創作觀念的陶藝,在國內是1980年代初,由留學美、日兩地之返回學生陸續引進的。他們不但帶回新的生產技法,也引進新的陶藝審美觀念。自此,整個陶藝生產的運作方式,才逐漸脫離原先的陶瓷工藝體制,並在90年代中期,隨著官方機構認知上的改變,建構出一個完全自主化的現代陶藝生產體制。
The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the origin and development of the field of modern pottery in Taiwan, and to find out the social drive shaping that field. Taking pottery as a kind of cultural production, our fundamental presupposition is that the practice of pottery based upon both social policy and the evaluating mechanism, which forms the judgment of its significance. It is all of them to make pottery work effectively, and to get the social legitimacy. In his theory of social change, Julian H. Steward (1902-1972), the American anthropologist, claims that in any region the development and changes of culture are the result of plural evolution. Accordingly we believe that modern pottery as a kind of social practice, its evaluation should not be monistic. There fore we regard that the reason why the pottery evaluation in Taiwan so distinctive form other regions (especially American, the origin of modern pottery), is caused of its unique tradition and context. In Taiwan, at the beginning pottery is not the genre of pure arts but a branch of courtly pottery; and latter it transformed into Aesthetic pottery. Therefore Aesthetic pottery became the primary concept of “pottery” in Taiwan; it is the late 1970s at the time. The real pottery, which means its creative idea instructed by Modernism, was first introduced into Taiwan during the early 1980s by the aboard students backing from U.S. and Japan. No merely new techniques, they brought back also new aesthetic attitude toward pottery. From then on, the whole mechanism of pottery production began to separate form the original system of craft; and further more, coming with the change of the authorities’ viewpoint, the autonomic production system of modern pottery had been constructed since the mid 1990s.
Other
1.陳新上(1997)。臺灣各地陶瓷發展概述(一)。  延伸查詢new window
2.龐靜平(1994)。採訪「水里蛇窯文化圓區」和集集「添興窯」。  延伸查詢new window
期刊論文
1.李亮一(1996)。一生的「陶醉」。藝術家,258,432-433。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳玉秀(1991)。華陶窯相思柴燒陶展前言。藝術家,197,450-451。  延伸查詢new window
3.蕭麗虹(1990)。世界重要陶展近況----並反省我國陶藝推展的種種問題。雄獅美術,228,100-105。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bourdie, Pierre、Johnson, Randal(1993)。The Field of Cultural Production。Cambridge:Polity Press。  new window
2.溫淑姿、劉良佑(1992)。陶藝研究:研究報告展覽專輯彙編。臺中:台灣省立美術館。  延伸查詢new window
3.Bürger, Peter、蔡佩君、徐明松(1998)。前衛藝術理論。臺北:時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Steward, Julian H.、張恭啟(1989)。文化變遷的理論。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
5.Greenberg, Clement(1939)。Avant-Garde and Kitsch。The Collected Essays and Criticism (vol.1)。Chicago。  new window
6.宋龍飛(1988)。四十年來陶藝發展之回顧。中華民國當代陶瓷展。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉鎮洲(1987)。現代陶藝中造型表現的特質。新造型陶藝特展。  延伸查詢new window
8.謝東山(2001)。2001臺灣地區現代陶藝年鑑。2001臺灣地區現代陶藝年鑑。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top