:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:The “Tell-Tale Women” in Richard III
書刊名:東海大學文學院學報
作者:鄭惠芳
作者(外文):Cheang, Wai Fong
出版日期:2001
卷期:42
頁次:頁211-240
主題關鍵詞:莎士比亞李察三世女性歷史論述空間ShakespeareRichard IIIWomenHistoryDiscursive space
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:40
This paper intends to explore the significance of the female characters in Shakespeare’s Richard III. It argues that the main dramatic tension in Richard III is not generated by a power contention between ale rivals, but by a discursive war between Richard III and various female characters. This discursive war is climaxed by Richard calling from alarums to strike when he finds himself surrounded by accusing women whom he labels “tell-tale women.” In fact, Richmond, who does not appear until near the end of the play, becomes a historical necessity. His dramatic importance is displaced by these “tell-tale women.” In view of the psychological tension created by Richard, who harps on his deformity and pronounces to the audience his villainous schemes, only the female characters can vie with him. They command equally frightening energy. Since discursive space is rendered extremely important in the play by Richard’s own manipulation of rumors and talks, women’s discourses are also empowered.
本文試圖探討莎翁作品《李察三世》中女性角色所具有之重要性,強調劇中之主要戲劇張力並非由男性的權力鬥爭所構成,而是源自於李察三世與女性之間的論戰。當李察三世被辱馬他的女人所包圍時,他下令敲響各式的警鐘戰鼓,企圖以雄壯而威武的聲音來淹沒那些女人──那些被他視為「搬弄是非的女人」──所發出的嘈雜而喧鬧的聲音。這幕眾聲喧嘩的精彩場景將李察三世與女性之冒的論戰帶到了高潮。相較之下奇蒙(Richmond)反而變成了劇中的歷史要素(historical necessity),直到本劇已近尾聲時才現身,其戲劇的重要性已被那些「搬弄是非的有女人」所取代。 李察三世經常抱怨自己肢體的畸形並向觀眾吐露自己不軌的意圖,於是這就形成一股高度的心理張力;而戲中卻只有女性角色可在這一方面與他相互衡,因為她們不是令觀眾感到毛骨悚然就是令李察三世感到不安。由於李察三世不斷製造謠言、操縱言論以打擊敵人,這使得處中的論述空間具有無比的重要性;相形之下,也使得女性角色的言論變得極具份量。
期刊論文
1.Kurtz, Martha A.(1996)。Rethinking Gender and Genre in the History Play。Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900,36(2),267-288。  new window
2.Rackin, Phyllis(1985)。Anti-Historians: Women's Roles in Shakespeare's Histories。Theatre Journal,37(3),329-344。  new window
3.Howard, Jean E.(1986)。The New Historicism in Renaissance Studies。English Literary Renaissanc,16(1),12-43。  new window
4.Peterson, Nancy J.(1994)。History, Postmodernism, and Louise Erdrich’s Tracks。PMLA,109(5),982-994。  new window
5.Baldo, Jonathan(1996)。Wars of Memory in Henry V.。Shakespeare Quarterly,47(2),132-159。  new window
6.Candido, Joseph(1987)。Thomas More, the Tudor Chroniclers, and Shakespeare’s Altered Richard。English Studies,68,137-141。  new window
7.Erickson, Peter(1987)。Rewriting the Renaissance, Rewriting Ourselves。Shakespeare Quarterly,38,327-337。  new window
8.McDonald, Russ(1989)。Richard Ⅲ’ and the Tropes of Treachery。Philological Quarterly,68(4),465-483。  new window
9.Pearlman, E.(1992)。The Invention of Richard of Gloucester。Shakespeare Quarterly,43(4),410-429。  new window
圖書
1.Saccio, Peter(1977)。Shakespeare’s English Kings: History, Chronicle, and Drama。London。  new window
2.Ranald, Margaret Loftus(1987)。Shakespeare and His Social Context: Essays in Osmotic Knowledge and Literary Interpretation。New York:AMS P。  new window
3.Williams, Raymond(1985)。Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism。Ithaca。  new window
4.Turgeon, Thomas S.(1997)。Improvising Shakespeare。New York。  new window
5.Erickson, Peter(1991)。Rewriting Shakespeare, Rewriting Ourselves。Berkeley。  new window
6.Shakespeare, William、Hammond, Antony(1981)。King Richard III。London:Methuen。  new window
7.Bamber, Linda(1982)。Comic Women, Tragic Men: A Study of Gender and Genre in Shakespeare。Stanford:Stanford University Press。  new window
8.Bushnell, Rebecca W.(1990)。Tragedies of Tyrants: Political Thought and Theater in the English Renaissance。Ithaca:Cornell University Press。  new window
9.Charney, Maurice(1993)。All of Shakespeare。New York:Columbia UP。  new window
10.Dusinberre, Juliet(1975)。Shakespeare and the Nature of Women。New York, NY:St. Martin's。  new window
11.Hopkins, Lisa(1998)。The Shakespearean Marriage: Merry Wives and Heavy Husbands。London:MacMillan。  new window
12.Howard, Jean E.、Rackin, Phyllis(1997)。Engendering a Nation: A Feminist Account of Shakespeare's English Histories。London:Routledge。  new window
13.Woodbridge, Linda(1994)。The Scythe of Saturn: Shakespeare and Magical Thinking。Urbana:U of Illinois P。  new window
14.Mullaney, Steven(1988)。The Place of the Stage: License, Play, and Power in Renaissance England。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
15.Adelman, Janet(1992)。Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to the Tempest。New York:Routledge。  new window
16.Greenblatt, Stephen Jay(1980)。Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare。University of Chicago Press。  new window
17.Geertz, Clifford(1973)。The interpretation of cultures。New York:Harper & Row:Basic Books。  new window
18.Barker, Deborah E.、Kamps, Ivo(1995)。Shakespeare and Gender: An Introduction。Shakespeare and Gender: A history。London。  new window
19.Cabell, James Branch(1992)。Critical Extract。Falstaff。New York。  new window
20.Charnes, Linda(1993)。Notorious Identity: Materializing the Subject in Shakespeare。Notorious Identity: Materializing the Subject in Shakespeare。London。  new window
21.Clark, Cumberland(1977)。Shakespare and the Supernatural。Shakespare and the Supernatural。Michigan。  new window
22.Farrell, Kirby(1989)。Play, Death, and Heroism in Shakespeare。Play, Death, and Heroism in Shakespeare。Chapel Hill。  new window
23.Legatt, Alexander(1988)。Shakespeare’s Political Drama: The History Plays and the Roman Plays。Shakespeare’s Political Drama: The History Plays and the Roman Plays。London。  new window
24.Lentricchia, Frank(1989)。Foucault’s Legacy-A New Historicism?。The New Historicism。New York。  new window
25.Lerner, Gerda(1993)。The Creation of Feminist Consciousness: From the Middle Ages to Eighteen-Seventy。The Creation of Feminist Consciousness: From the Middle Ages to Eighteen-Seventy。New York。  new window
26.Miner, Madonne M.(1980)。Neither Mother, Wife, nor England’s Queen’: The Role of Women in Richard Ⅲ。The Woman’s Part: Feminist Criticism of Shakespeare。Urbana。  new window
27.Montrose, Louis A.(1994)。Eliza, Queen of Shepherds’ and the Pastoral of Power。The New Historicism Reader。New York。  new window
28.Newton, Judith Lower(1989)。History as Usual? Feminism and the ‘New Historicism’。The New Historicism。New York。  new window
29.Paris, Bernard J.(1991)。Character as a Subversive Force in Shakespeare: The History and Roman Plays。Character as a Subversive Force in Shakespeare: The History and Roman Plays。London。  new window
30.Rackin, Phyllis(1995)。Engendering the Tragic Audience: The Case of Richard Ⅲ。Shakespeare and Gender: A Histroy。London。  new window
31.Rogin, Michael(1994)。‘Make My Day!’: Spectacle as Amnesia in Imperial Politics。The New Historicism Reader。New York。  new window
32.Rossiter, A. P.(1986)。Angel with Horns: The Unity of Richard Ⅲ。William Shakespeare: Histories and Poems。New York。  new window
33.Vaughan, Virginia M.(1989)。King John: A Study in Subversion and Containment。King John: New Perspectives。Newark。  new window
34.Weimann, Robert(1996)。Performance-Game and Representation in Richard Ⅲ。Textual and Theatrical Shakespeare: Questions of Evidence。Iowa。  new window
圖書論文
1.Williams, Raymond(1985)。Afterword。Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism。Ithaca:Cornell UP。  new window
2.Montrose, Louis A.(1989)。Professing the Renaissance: The Poetics and the Politics of Culture。The New Histroicism。New York。  new window
3.Smallwood, R. L.(1986)。Shakespeare's Use of History。The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare Studies。Cambridge:Cambridge UP。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top