:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:A Cognitive Study of the Conceptual Structure of Container-Derived Classifiers in Mandarin Chinese
書刊名:興大人文學報
作者:李靜桂
作者(外文):Lee, Adrienne Chingkwei
出版日期:2002
卷期:32(上)
頁次:頁461-481
主題關鍵詞:量詞容器量詞認知語意學語言和概念ClassifiersContainer-derived classifiersCognitive semanticsLanguage and conceptualizationFrameSchemaMarkedUnmarkedLandmarkTrajectorProfileUsage-based grammarMental lexicon
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:24
The purpose of this study is to investigate the conceptual structure of container-derived classifiers in contemporary Mandarin Chinese used in Taiwan. classifiers in general, classifiers in Chinese, and container-derived classifiers are introduced first, and then a short sketch of cognitive grammar is given to set the heretical framework. A conceptual cognitive analysis of container-derived classifiers. A conclusion is given at the end.
本研究之目的在於探討目前臺灣使用的漢語中容器量詞的概念結構。首牨,介紹一般的量詞、漢語量詞、以及容器名詞轉化而成的容器量詞。之後,簡述做為理架構的認知語法。再根據認知語法理論的觀點,分析容器量詞。皆析之結果,將容器量詞歸納為三類:1.位置指標(a location indicator),2.測量之次單位(a second-level unit of measure),3.在非時間關係中的基準(a landmark in an atemporal relation)。之後,再探討容器量詞的三個使用條件:1.容器量詞之後的名詞所指的物質均為該容器可容納之物質,2.在概念上,容器量詞所能容納的最大容量,即為容器量詞之後的名詞的數量,3.每一個人使用容器量詞時都不會出現任問題,他們會用典型的容器量詞也會用隱喻型的容量詞。本研究顯示出容器量詞在研究語言與認知的關係中所佔的重要地位,而且忽略了容器量詞的探討,在量詞的研究上可能會是一大缺失。
期刊論文
1.Allen, Keith(1977)。Classifiers。Language,53(2),285-311。  new window
2.Li, Wen-Dan(2000)。Numeral-classifiers as a grounding mechanism in Mandarin Chinese。Journal of Chinese Linguistics,28(2),337-368。  new window
3.李靜桂(20000600)。Chinese Classifier Tiao Revisited: A Cognitive Linguistics Study。文史學報(中興大學),30,147-186。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.戴浩一、Wang, L. Q.(1990)。A semantic study of the classifier tiao。中文教師學會學報,25(1),35-56。  new window
5.Brewer, W. F.、Treyens, J. C.(1981)。Role of Schemata in memory for places。Cognitive Psychology,13,207-230。  new window
6.Friedrich, Paul(1970)。Shape in grammar。Language,46,379-407。  new window
7.Schafer, Edward H.(1948)。Noun classifiers in classical Chinese。Language,24(4),408-413。  new window
8.Tai, James H-Y、Chao, Fang-Yi(1994)。The semantic study of the classifier zhang。Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association,29,67-78。  new window
圖書
1.Craig, Collette G.(1986)。Noun Classes and Categorization- Proceedings of a Symposium on Categorization and Noun Classification。Amsterdam:John Benjamins。  new window
2.Hyman, L. M.(1975)。Phonology: Theory and Analysis。Phonology: Theory and Analysis。New York。  new window
3.Langacker, R.(1990)。Foundations of Cognitive Grammar -- Descriptive Application。Stanford:Stanford University Press。  new window
4.王力(1957)。漢語史稿(上冊)。漢語史稿(上冊)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
5.Allan, Keith(2001)。Natural Language Semantics。  new window
6.Langacker, Ronald W.(2000)。Grammar and Conceptualization。Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter。  new window
7.Langacker, Ronald W.(1991)。Concept, Image, and symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar。Mouton de Gruyter。  new window
8.Langacker, Ronald W.(1991)。Foundations of cognitive grammar: Descriptive application。Stanford:Stanford University Press。  new window
9.趙元任(1968)。A Grammar of Spoken Chinese。University of California Press。  new window
10.Carpenter, Kathie(1992)。Two dynamic views of classifier systems: diachronic change and individual development。Two dynamic views of classifier systems: diachronic change and individual development。  new window
11.(1989)。Dictionary of Chinese Classifiers。Dictionary of Chinese Classifiers。  new window
12.Fromkin, Victoria、Rodman, Robert(1998)。Introduce to language。Introduce to language。  new window
13.(1990)。Kuo-YU Huo-Ying Chi-Dian。Kuo-YU Huo-Ying Chi-Dian。Taipei。  new window
14.Nuyts, Jan、Pederson, Eric(1997)。Language and conceptualization。Language and conceptualization。  new window
15.王力(1958)。漢語史稿(下冊)。漢語史稿(下冊)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
16.(1989)。Xinhua Cidian。Xinhua Cidian。Peking。  new window
17.Tannen, Deborah(1979)。What's in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations。Directions in Discourse Processing。Norwood, N. J.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Minsky, M. F.(1975)。A framework for representing knowledge。The psychology of computer vision。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE