:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:師院大一學生電化學概念建構的研究
書刊名:臺中師院學報
作者:蘇育任張馨文
作者(外文):Su, Yu-jenChang, Hsin-wen
出版日期:2002
卷期:16
頁次:頁471-498
主題關鍵詞:心智模式迷思概念電化學概念學習Conceptual constructionMental modelsInferred mental modelsMisconceptions
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:23
     化學教育研究的相關文獻顯示國外許多大專學生在學習電化學時,普遍生得艱深難懂,甚至產生不少迷思概念,我國學生在相關概念的學習情況如何,實有深入探究之必要。本研究乃以國立臺中師範學院自然科學教育系一年級及輔系選修普通化學的學生共78名為研究對象,探討其修習電化學的概念理解情況。先利用研究者自編並經過信度、效度考驗之紙筆測驗,瞭解學生電化學的概念學習成效;再依據學生作答情形,選擇進行正式訪談的對象,包括自科系一年級學生12名與輔系學生4名,共16名。接著分析學生的談話內容,以探究其在電化學的概念建構,進而建立學生推論的心智模式。 本研究的主要發現,可分成三部分敘述如下: 一、紙筆測驗的概念理解情況: 自科系一年級與輔系學生在計算電池電位、電極的極性判斷、鹽橋物質導電方式及氧化-還原反應判斷等概念上較為正確,但在電流、涅斯特方程式、鹽橋溝通方式與鹽橋物質特性等四方面錯跡的比率較高。 二、訪談資料分析的結果: 對16名學生進行訪談之後,發現他們都有許多迷思概念,主要的迷思概念在鹽橋溶特性(62.5%)、電池液濃度對電位的影響(93.75%)及濃差電池(50%)這三部份。(括弧內為具有迷思念的學生比率) 三、概念建構的分析結果: 將低、中、高成就組學生之心智模式加以比較,結果顯示學生的錯誤都是在基本概念或定義上,其基本概念一旦有錯誤,往下進行推理時也會出錯。
     This study set out to explore students' misconceptions and their inferred mental models in electrochemistry. The subjects consisted for seventy eight first-year students in National Taichung Teachers college. A reliable and validated instrument composed of seven main concepts was administered firstly to understand students' conceptual construction. The qualitative data form interviewing sixteen representative subjects was further examined to find students' misconceptions and to construct their inferred mental models. The main findings of this study are listed as follows: A. The students have many wrong concepts in current, Nernst equation, the way of conducting and the properties of materials in the salt bridge. B. After analyzing the interview data, it was found that students make a lot of mistakes as well as the concentration cells. C. From the constructed diagrams of students' mental models, it was shown that most students make mistakes in both theoretical and mathematical models, and if they should have wrong conceptual understanding of the basic concepts in those seven aspects, they will make improper connections in their inferred medntal models.
期刊論文
1.Finley, F. N.、Stewart, J、Yarroch, W. L.(1982)。Teachers' perception of important and difficult science content。Science Education,66(4),531-538。  new window
2.Garnett, P. J.、Treagust, D. F.(1992)。Conceptual difficulties experienced by high school students of electrochemistry: electric circuit and oxidation-reduction equations。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,29(2),121-142。  new window
3.Garnett, P. J.、Treagust, D. F.(1992)。Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of electrochemistry: electrochemical (Galvanic) and electrolytic cells。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,29(10),1079-1199。  new window
4.Ogude, A. N.、Bradley, J. D.(1996)。Electrode processes and aspect relating to cell e.m.f., current, and cell component in operating electrochemical cells。Journal of Chemical Education,73(12),1145-1149。  new window
5.Sanger, M. J.、Greenbowe, T. J.(1997)。Students' misconception in electrochemistry: current flow in electrolyte solution and salt bridge。Journal of Chemical Education,74(7),819-823。  new window
6.Butts, B.、Smith, R.(1987)。What do students perceive as difficult in H.S.C chemistry?。Australian Science Teachers Journal,32(4),45-51。  new window
7.Sanger, M. J.、Greenbowe, T. J.(1997)。Common student misconceptions in electrochemistry: galvanic, electrolytic and concentration cells。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,34(4),377-398。  new window
會議論文
1.郭順利、黃寶鈿(1998)。探究高中生在電化學上的錯誤概念及成因。第十四屆科學教育學術研討會暨第十一屆科學教育學會年會,309-316。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE