:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中國邏輯思維的「形式」與「情境」--從《墨辯.小取》的規則談起
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:邱建碩 引用關係
作者(外文):Chiu, Chien-shuo
出版日期:2002
卷期:29:9=340
頁次:頁814-824+869-870
主題關鍵詞:形式內容替換情境選擇情境序對FormContentReplacementCategoriesChoice of conditionsOrdered pair of conditions
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:23
     中國邏輯分享著西方邏輯的「普遍性」嗎?或者中國思維有著完全不同的系統?本文將透過三方面的討論,希望能為給予這些問題的一個新的切入點:(一)中國思維的形式化、(二)「類」概念及(三)情境問題。首先藉由Von Wright在“From and Content in Logic”一文中對「形式」和「內容」兩詞的分析,探討〈小取〉規則是否具有普遍形式。再者,提出「偏有偏無」關係做為「類」概念的主要特徵,而〈小取〉規則可以被視為表明「偏有偏無」關係的規則。最後,提出三個情境選擇原則試圖協調現實的利和精神的義之間的衝突。
     Does Chinese Logic share the “universality” of Western Logic? Ordoes it have a completely different system? This paper is to discuss the question from three different angles-the formalization of Chinese thoughts, the idea of “categories” and the issue of condition-in wishes to bring in a new approach. First, by means of Von Wright's analysis of “from” and “content” in his article “Form and Content in Logic,” we will discuss whether the rule implied in “Shiao Qu” has a universal form. Besides, we will propose “partialness” as the major feature of the idea of “categories.” Finally, we will bring in three principles of choosing conditions in order to resolve the conflict between the practical interests and the spiritual justice.
期刊論文
1.Thierry, Lucas(1993)。Journal of Chinese Philosophy。Journal of Chinese Philosophy,20。  new window
圖書
1.陳孟麟(1996)。墨辯邏輯學新探。墨辯邏輯學新探。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.張東蓀(1995)。理性與良知:張東蓀文選。上海。  延伸查詢new window
3.墨翟。墨子。  延伸查詢new window
4.孫詒讓、孫以楷、墨翟(1987)。墨子閒詁。臺北:華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.von Wright, G. H.(2000)。Form and Content in Logic。Logical Studies。London。  new window
其他
1.墨辯。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top