:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論金元時期兩本批判朱子「論語集注」的著作--從「論語辨惑」到「論語辨疑」
書刊名:東海中文學報
作者:廖雲仙 引用關係
作者(外文):Liao, Yun-hsien
出版日期:2002
卷期:14
頁次:頁59-96
主題關鍵詞:王若虛陳天祥論語辨惑論語辨疑Wang Ruo-xuChen Tien-xiangResolution of Perplexities in the AnalectsResolution Doubts in the Analects
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:19
朱子集宋學之大成,著成《四書章句集注》,是書謹嚴可法,精粹可取,自宋末至元,學者莫不尊奉而發明之,遂使研究《四書章句集注》蔚為風尚,因此一般經學史均將元代視為朱子學之餘緒,鮮有心得。實則宋末迄元也有若干檢討批判《四書章句集注》的著作,如金代王若虛《論語辨惑》及元代陳天祥《四書辨疑》即此類之佼佼者。二人以朱子《論語集注》與宋人說解的缺點有三:「過深」、「過高」、「過厚」;他們主張說解《論語》的方法有三:一、讀《論語》不可以文害義,要以意逆志;二、解經須貼合經旨,不可違戾聖人之言;三、若干分章有待商榷,若干經文有待存疑。本文除了闡明這三點批評與三點主張外,間亦論及陳天祥承繼與發明王若虛處,並比較《論語辨惑》與《論語辨疑》的異同。尤其二人的諸多精到識見,與清代諸學者相較,誠不遑多讓。在朱學興盛的元代,這種與朱子立異的著作,更顯得有不流於俗的價值與特色。
Zhu Xi epitomized the learning of the Song Dynasty in his work Collected Notes on Passages in the Four Books, an erudite work. From the Song to the Yuan Dynasty, many scholars offered elaborated comments on Zhu Xi's work, and the research on Collected Notes on Passages in the FourBooks became a major academic trend for many generations. Most historians of Chinese thought consider the Yuan Dynasty to be a flowermg period of Zhu Xi's thought. In fact, the reviews and critiques of Collected notes on Passages in the Four Books, have already appeared in the period from the late Song to the early Yuan, such as Wang Ruo-xu's Resolution of Perplexities in the Analects in the Jin Dynasty and Chen Tein-xiang's Resolution of Doubts in the Four Books among the outstanding examples. This author examines 91 passages in Wang Ruo-xu's work and 173 passages in Chen Tien-hsiang's, and discuss the differences and similarities of these two works. In view of Chen Tien-xiang as scholarly heir of Wang Ruo-xu, we also examine how the two men considered Zhu Xi's work to be "overly abstruse", "overly sublime", and "overly generous". Their methods of analyzing the Analects are: (1) To read between the lines. (2) To respect the words of the sages. (3) The Classics still contain uncertain passages await discussion. At a time when Zhu Xi's ideas dominated the official world of China, Wang and Chen published views contrary to Zhu Xi's were clearly an execptional event worthy of our attention.
期刊論文
1.饒宗頤(19680500)。三教論與宋金學術。東西文化,11,24-32。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳哲夫(1976)。《四書辨疑》十五卷(善本書志)。故宮季刊,11(1),69-71。  延伸查詢new window
3.郭鶴鳴(19920600)。論語集注「謙辭」商榷。國文學報,21,55-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.林慶彰(2000)。元儒陳天祥對《四書集注》的批評。臺北。711-712。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.宋濂(1995)。元史。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.王若虛。滹南遺老集。四部叢刊本。  延伸查詢new window
3.蘇天爵(1986)。滋溪文稿。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
4.紀昀、永瑢(1989)。四庫全書總目。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.朱彝尊(1999)。經義考。臺北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
6.王夫之(1972)。讀四書大全說。台北:自由出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.何晏、朱熹、程樹德(1990)。論語集釋。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃虞稷(1990)。千頃堂書目。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.黎靖德(1996)。朱子語類。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.何晏、皇侃(1991)。論語集解義疏。臺北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.梁章鉅(1978)。論語旁證。臺北:廣文書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.孔丘、程樹德、程俊英、蔣見元(1990)。論語集釋。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.劉子健(1983)。金代與南宋在思想史上的再估價。宋史研究集(第十四輯)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.張栻。南軒論語解。  延伸查詢new window
15.松川健二(1990)。朱熹《論語集注》─理學的成熟。論語の思想史。東京。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)黃式三(1995)。論語後案,上海。  延伸查詢new window
2.(元)托克托(1992)。金史,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(金)元好問(1986)。遺山集。  延伸查詢new window
4.(金)王若虛(1975)。論語辨惑,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.程樹德。論語集釋(第三冊),北京。  延伸查詢new window
6.(清)陳澧(1972)。東塾讀書記,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.程樹德。論語集釋(第四冊),北京。  延伸查詢new window
8.(金)元好問(1975)。中州集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.(宋)金履祥(1986)。論語集注考證,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.(清)康有為(1917)。論語注,北平。  延伸查詢new window
11.(清)俞樾(1995)。四書辨疑辨,上海。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.陳鐵凡(198101)。四書章句集注考源。論孟論文集。臺北市:黎明文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE