:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Some New Results on Spearman's Hypothesis
書刊名:中華心理學刊
作者:舒彼得
作者(外文):Schönemann, Peter H.
出版日期:2002
卷期:44:2
頁次:頁137-150
主題關鍵詞:心理測驗智力史培曼假說史培曼g因子黑白智商差距種族政策Mental testsIntelligenceSpearman's hypothesisSpearman's gArtefactsBlack white IQ differencesRacism
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:21
Speramen (1927)發現智力分測驗在最主要特徵向量上的負載值,和黑白不同人種群體分測驗平均數差距之間呈現正相關;在後續文章中引述此一發現,並聲稱正相關證實智力中的g因子和黑白人種差異之間存在著密切關聯。然而智力分測驗得分數據只要彼此呈現正相關,且接近多元常態分配就會得到Spearman的當果,和智力g因子或人種差異毫無關聯。此一論點可藉由理論證明、電腦模擬研究、及分析Jensen使用過的數據而得到支持。然而有些文獻依舊質疑此一論點;例如,Steiger(1977)在並充足無證據的情況下宣稱多元常態假設並不適用於Jensen所使用的數據。本文主要證明多元常態分配相對於Steiger所建議的分配模式更適合解釋Jensen的數據。本文最後並重新證明餘弦(cosine)和統計相關之間的關聯,且藉此重新詮釋Spearman假說。
In a number of publications, Jensen has recalled Spearman’s (1972) observation that, for Black/White IQ data, the loadings on the dominant eigenvectors (Note 1) in each battery tend to correlate positively with the subtest mean differences (“Spearman’s Hypothesis”, Level II). According to Jensen, these positive correlations confirm the existence of a general intelligence factor (“g”) closely related to Black/White IQ differences. The present author has argued that these positive correlations can be explained as a simple consequence of the multinormality and positivity of IQ data, and thus have nothing to do with race or g. This thesis is supported by algebraic deduction, by geometric argument, by computer simulations, and, indeed, by Jensen’s own data. Some authors have challenged this account, most recently Steiger (1997). He contends the needed multinormality assumption is unwarranted for Jensen’s data –without, however, providing any evidence to support this claim (Note 9). Here it will be shown that, in fact, Jensen’s data fit the multinormality assumption much better than an alternative model (“l”) Steiger has proposed. Finally, a new result relating cosines and correlations will be presented, which sheds additional light on the Spearman Hypothesis artifact in the fallible case.
期刊論文
1.Dolan, C. V.(1997)。A note on Schonemann's refutation of Spearman's Hypothesis。Multivariate Behavioral Research,32,319-325。  new window
2.Guttman, L.(1992)。The irrelevance of factor analysis for the study of group differences。Multivariate Behavioral Research,27,175-204。  new window
3.Horn, J.(1997)。On the mathematical relationship between factor or component coefficients and differences between means。Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/ Current Psychology of Cognition,16,721-728。  new window
4.Jensen, A.(1985)。The nature of the black-white difference on various psychometric tests: Spearman's hypothesis。The Behavioral and Brain Sciences,8,193-263。  new window
5.Kadlec, H.(1997)。The correlation between the mean difference vector and first principal component holds even with discrete variables containing no g。Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/ Current Psychology of Cognition,16,731-737。  new window
6.Loehlin, J. C.(1992)。On Schonemann on Guttman on Jensen, via Lewontin。Multivariate Behavioral Research,27,261-263。  new window
7.Maraun, M.(1997)。Exactly what is an artefact?。Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/ Current Psychology of Cognition,16,738-747。  new window
8.Milsap, R. E.(1997)。The investigation of Spearman's Hypothesis and the failure to understand factor analysis。Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/ Current Psychology of Cognition,16,748-755。  new window
9.舒彼得(1985)。On artificial intelligence。Behavioral and Brain Sciences,8,241-242。  new window
10.舒彼得(1989)。Some new results of the Spearman Hypothesis artifact。Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,27,463-464。  new window
11.舒彼得(1992)。Extension of Guttman's result from g to PCI。Multivariate Behavioral Research,27,219-224。  new window
12.舒彼得(1997)。Famous artefacts: Spearman's Hypothesis。Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/ Current Psychology of Cognition,16,665-694。  new window
13.Shockley, W.(1987)。Jensen's data on Spearman's Hypothesis: No artifact。Behavioral and Brain Sciences,10。  new window
14.Steiger, J. H.(1997)。Alternate models and the evaluation of social issues。Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/ Current Psychology of Cognition,16,760-766。  new window
研究報告
1.舒彼得(1988)。A note on Spearman's Hypothesis。West Lafayette, IN。  new window
圖書
1.Spearman, C.(1927)。The Abilities of Man。MacMillan。  new window
2.Ayer, A. J.(1972)。Probability and evidence。Probability and evidence。New York, NY。  new window
3.Jensen, A.(1987)。Differential psychology: Towards consensus。Arthur Jensen: Consensus and controversy。New York, NY。  new window
4.Reichenbach, H.(1980)。Elements of symbolic logic。Elements of symbolic logic。New York, NY。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE