:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:Protecting Intellectual Property Rights in China in the Context of the Past, the Present and the Future
書刊名:東吳法律學報
作者:葉錦鴻 引用關係
作者(外文):Yeh, Chin-hung
出版日期:2002
卷期:14:1
頁次:頁195-230
主題關鍵詞:中國商標法世界貿易組織中國專利法世界智慧財產權組織與貿易有關之智慧財產權協定中國著作權法World Trade OrganizationChina trademark lawChina patent lawChina copyright lawWord intellectual property organizationAgreements on trade-related intellectual property rightsTRIPS
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:25
此篇文章的目的,乃是檢視中國於過去及現在如何保護智慧財產權,同時探討中國在現今及未來保護智慧財產權所面臨的問題。第一部分介紹中國在1978年開始廣泛的經濟改革後所制定的智慧財產權的法律(商標法、著作權法、專利法)。同時為了解中國在1978年後對保護智慧財產權所做的努力,1978年前,中國智慧財產權的法律,也一併於此加以介紹。第二部分,審視中國為了解決智慧財產權的法律紛爭,於1993年所設置的專屬法庭。第三部分,討論TRIPS協定對中國智慧財產權的保護及執行所產生的影響。第四部分指出許多因素,例如貧窮,法律人才的不足,貪污,欠缺私有財產觀念的傳統,及新的複製技術的發明,都阻礙中國對智慧財產權的保護及執行。 最後,本文認為,世界智慧財產權組織對中國智慧財產權的保護及執行,會是較有效率的解決機構。
Protecting Intellectual Property Rights in China in the context of the Past, the Present and the future. The purpose of this article is to examine how intellectual property rights in China were and are protected nowadays and to look into the problems of protecting intellectual property in China in the present and the Future. The first part examines China's intellectual property laws (trademark law, copyright law, and patent law) enacted after 1978, the time of the launching of widespread economic reform. In order to understand what the Chinese government did to improve the protection of intellectual property rights in china after 1978, the intellectual property laws enacted prior to 1978 are also introduced in this part. The second part examines the jurisdiction of specialized courts dedicated to the resolution of legal disputes concerning patent, trademark and copyright law. China created a specialized court system for the resolution of legal disputes concerning intellectual property in 1993. The third part discusses what the TRIPS Agreements would do to the enforcement and protection of intellectual property in China. The fourth part points out that many factors such as poverty, the lack of human resources, official corruption, the lack of private property traditions and even the emergence of new copying technologies presents serious obstacles to completely or substantially eradicate the problem of enforcement and protection of intellectual property rights in China. Finally, the paper conclude with the proposition that the WIPO arbitration disputes resolution mechanism and procedure appear to be a better and more effective solution in protecting and enforcing intellectual property rights in China.
期刊論文
1.Endeshaw, Assafa(1996)。A Critical Assessment of the U.S.-China Conflict on Intellectual Property。Alb. L. J. Sci. & Tech.,6,295-337。  new window
2.Dreyfus, David B.(1998)。NOTE & COMMENT: Confucianism and Compact Discs: Alternative Dispute Resolution and its Role in the Protection of United States Intellectual Property Rights in China。Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol.,13,948-949。  new window
3.Chow, Daniel C. K.(2000)。Counterfeiting in the People's Republic of China。Wash. U. L. Q.,78,9。  new window
4.Duvanel, Fonda Y.(1996)。NOTE: The Evolution and Enforcement of Computer Software Copyright in the People's Republic of China。N. Y. L. Sch. J. Int'l & Comp. L.,16,341。  new window
5.Willard, Geoffrey T.(1996)。The Protection of Computer Software in the People's Republic of China: Current Law & Case Developments in the "One-Copy" Country。J. Marshall Computer & Info.,14,695。  new window
6.Butterton, Glenn R.(1996)。ARTICLE: Pirates, Dragons and U.S. Intellectual Property Rights in China: Problems and Perspectives of Chinese Enforcement。Ariz. L. Rev.,38,1101。  new window
7.Chen, Grace(2001)。New and Improved Patent Law。China Law & Practice,15(6),42。  new window
8.Davies, Paul(200109)。Infringement Aspects of the New Chinese Patent Law。China Law & Practice,15(7),88-89。  new window
9.Lovoi, Jeanmarie(1999)。NOTE: Competing Interests: Anti-Piracy Efforts Triumph Under TRIPS but New Copying Technology Undermines the Success。Brooklyn J. Int'l L.,25,445。  new window
10.Fan, Jennifer(1999)。COMMENT: The Dilemma of China,s Intellectual Property Piracy。UCLA J. Int'l L. & For. Aff.,4,207。  new window
11.Haskins, Keshia B.(1999)。NOTE: Special 301 in China and Mexico: A Policy Which Fails to Consider How Politics, Economics, and Culture Affect Legal Change Under Civil Law Systems of Developing Countries。Fordham I. P., Media & Ent. L. J.,9,1125。  new window
12.Yelpaala, Kojo(1989)。Restraining the Unruly Horse: The Use of Public Policy in Arbitration, Interstate and International Conflict of Laws in California。Transnat'l Law,2,460。  new window
13.Cheng, Lucie、Rosett, Arthur(1991)。Contract With a Chinese Face: Socially Embedded Factors in the Transformation from Hierarchy to Market, 1978-1989。J. Chinese,5,143-196。  new window
14.Schlesinger, Michael N.(1995)。NOTE: A Sleeping Giant Awakens: The Development of Intellectual Property Law in China。J. Chinese L.,9,101。  new window
15.Birden, Paul B. Jr.(1996)。ARTICLE: Trademark Protection in China: Trends and Directions。Loy. L. A. Intl & Comp. L. J.,18,440。  new window
16.Lubman, Stanley(2000)。ARTICLE: Bird in a Cage: Chinese Law Reform After Twenty Years。J. Int'l L. Bus.,20,389。  new window
17.Rengan, Shen、Yingke, Zhong(1984)。China & Copyright。Copyright,20,262。  new window
18.McKenzie, Scott A.(1998)。COMMENT: Global Protection of Trademark Property Rights: A Comparison of Infringement and Remedies Available in China versus the European Union。Gonz. L. Rev.,34,553。  new window
19.Ansson, Richard J. Jr.(1999)。ARTICLE: International Property Rights, the United States, and the People's Republic of China。Temp. Int'l & Comp. L. J.,13,14。  new window
20.Yeh, Peggy(1999)。NOTE: Yo, Ho, Ho and a CD-Rom: The Current State of Software Piracy in the PRC。Law & Pol’y Int'l Bus.,31,173。  new window
21.Slate, William K. II(1996)。International Arbitration: Do Institutions Make a Difference?。Wake Forest L. Rev.,31,44。  new window
22.Tiefenbrun, Susan(1998)。ARTICLE: Piracy of Intellectual Property in China and the Former Soviet Union and its Effects Upon International Trade: A Comparison。Buffalo L. Rev.,46,1。  new window
其他
1.(19971110)。China: Laws Being Promulgated to Protect IPR(WL 13647865)。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top