資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.138.151.252)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Why Peer Comments Fail
書刊名:
英語教學
作者:
閔慧慈
作者(外文):
Min, Hui-tzu
出版日期:
2003
卷期:
27:3
頁次:
頁85-103
主題關鍵詞:
同儕評論
;
英語寫作
;
外語寫作
;
臺灣學生
;
個案研究
;
中文
;
Peer review
;
ESL/EFL writing
;
Taiwanese students
;
Case study
;
Chinese
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
7
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
7
共同引用:0
點閱:16
本研究旨在探討外語寫作者為何不納同儕意見。經由反覆不斷的比較六位外交系大二學生的初稿、同儕針對渠等初稿所給予的意見、六位學生依據同儕意見所修正的再稿、及研究者與渠等訪談的結果發現,這六位學生未採納部分同儕意見的主要原因有二:一為作者對其文章具有主控權,即使遇到可行之建議,亦因作者主觀判定影響,而未採納;二為耜分同儕意見太過含糊籠統,因此作者不知如何修改。據此研究者建議,同儕討論以三人小組形式進行較佳。若有兩位評論者同時對文章某部分提出建議,作者應採納此建議並做適當修正,如此可避免作者只因一人意見就修改自己文章,而喪失對有章的主導權,或因自己主觀認定而認為個人意見不足可取,以致忽略讀者的意見。最後研究者並提出四項步驟,協助教師指導同儕評論者如何提出具體可行之意見。評論者須先釐清作者原意,以免因誤解而提出不可行之意見;再指出問題所在;並根據作者上下文意宗釋為何會有此問題產生;最後再根據此一問題,建議可行之修改方法並舉例說明。如此詮盡的同儕評論才較具有說服力及參考價值,亦較能被作者採用。
以文找文
This study examines reasons why EFL writers fail to incorporate peer comments into their subsequent revisions. Through comparing and contrasting six EFL students' first and second drafts and their peers' comments as well as interviewing the students' first and second drafts and their peer's comments as well as interviewing the students, the researcher identified two major reasons for students' failure to accept peer feedback: A strong sense of text ownership on the writers' part and vagueness of feedback on the reviewers' part. The researcher recommends using response groups to maintain a balance between writers' ownership of the test and sensitivity to audience needs, and suggests using a four-step (clarifying the writer's intention, identifying problems, explaining the nature of problems, and making suggestions) approach to coaching peer reviewers in generating more specific feedlback.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Tsui, A. B. M.、Ng, Manwa L.(2000)。Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?。Journal of Second Language Writing,9(2),141-170。
2.
Mendonca, Cassia O.、Johnson, Karen E.(1994)。Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction。TESOL Quarterly,28(4),745-769。
3.
Mangelsdorf, Kate、Schlumberger, Ann(1992)。ESL student response stances in a peer-review task。Journal of Second Language Writing,1(3),235-254。
4.
Connor, U.、Asenavage, K.(1994)。Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision?。Journal of Second Language Writing,3(3),257-276。
5.
Nelson, Gayle L.、Murphy, John M.(1993)。Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts?。TESOL Quarterly,27(1),135-141。
6.
Gere, A. R.、Abbot, R. D.(1985)。Talking about writing: The language of writing groups。Research in the Teaching of English,19,362-379。
7.
Flower, Linda、Hayes, John R.(1981)。A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing。Research in the Teaching of English,15(3),329-343。
8.
Ferris, Dana R.(1997)。The influence of teacher commentary on student revision。TESOL Quarterly,31(2),315-339。
9.
Leki, I.(1990)。Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes。CATESOL Journal,3(1),5-19。
10.
Carson, Joan G.、Nelson, Gayle L.(1996)。Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction。Journal of Second Language Writing,5(1),1-19。
11.
Caulk, N.(1994)。Comparing teacher and student responses to written work。TESOL Quarterly,28(1),181-188。
12.
Lockhart, C.、Ng, P.(1993)。How useful is peer response?。Perspectives,5(1),17-29。
13.
Mangelsdorf, K.(1992)。Peer reviews in the composition classroom: What do the students think?。English Language Teaching Journal,46(3),274-284。
14.
Carson, Joan G.、Nelson, Gayle L.(1994)。Writing groups: Cross-cultrual issues。Journal of Second Language Writing,3(1),17-30。
15.
Kroll, Barry M.、Vann, Robert J.(1981)。Exploring speaking-writing relationships: Connections and contrasts。College Composition and Communication,32,365-388。
會議論文
1.
Min, Hui-Tzu(1998)。Variables influencing the peer review in an EFL writing class。The Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching。Taipei:The Crane Publishing CO, LTD。745-752。
2.
Chou, M. C.(1998)。How peer negotiations shape revisions。Taipei。349-359。
圖書
1.
Blass, Laurie、Pike-Baky, Meredith(2002)。Mosaic 1: Writing。Mosaic 1: Writing。NY。
2.
Moll, L. C.(1989)。Teaching second language students: A Vygotskian perspective。Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students。New York。
3.
Nystrand, M.(1986)。Learning to write by talking about writing: A summary of research on intensive peer review in expository writing instruction at the University of Wisconsin-Madison。The structure of written communication。New York。
圖書論文
1.
Gere, A. R.、Stevens, R.(1985)。The language of writing groups: How oral response shapes revision。The acquisition of written language: Response and revision。Norwood, NJ:Ablex。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
The Online Peer Review: An Exploratory Study on Taiwanese EFL Undergraduate Students as Reviewers and Recipients of Online Feedback
2.
探究過程導向式教學法應用於線上學習平臺對大專護理學生學習英語寫作成效與滿意度之研究
3.
EFL Students' Decision-Making and Criteria Use in Peer Review: Influence of Teacher Writing Beliefs
4.
The Effect of Peer-Review and Teacher-Review in Young NNS Learners' Guided Writing Instruction
5.
An Overview of EFL Writing Research in Taiwan
6.
Harnessing Peers' Power in EFL: Revision with Peer Feedback
7.
A Study on Online Peer Feedback
8.
音素覺識在中文閱讀習得歷程中的角色:個案研究
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code