:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:實證主義對護理的意義與反證
書刊名:護理雜誌
作者:楊克平
作者(外文):Yang, Ke-ping
出版日期:2003
卷期:50:1
頁次:頁44-47
主題關鍵詞:實證主義實證護理可證性護理研究PositivismEvidence-based nursingConfirmationNursing research
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:32
     護理研究自始即與實證主義關係密切,它是一種以系統性的方法去發現或重新證實某特定問題的實情之過程。其過程是利用一種可歸類為控制、預測、實證、測量及實驗性方法的「科學」架構;它與實證主義所強調的方法無甚區別。但是科學並非獨立的知識系統,必須從不同的角度作綜合性的研究,方能對它有較完整的認識。日益複雜與多元的醫療行為與措施將置臨床實務及護理於危機。本文旨在提供實證主義的護理研究的另類思辨,並建議我們面對以人為本的護理實務時,應分辨何處是科學運用的盡頭及何處是人性詮釋的啟動點。
     From its beginning, nursing research has been closely related to positivism. Nursing research is a process that systematically explores or proves certain specific questions by using a framework of control, prediction, evidence, measurement experience. There is no difference between the method of nursing research and positivism. Science is not an independent knowledge system, it has to integrate from various perspectives in order to reach a full understanding. Increasingly sophisticated and complex medical interventions put evidence-based nursing at risk. This paper provides alternative critical examination when practiced in nursing and recommends that scientific nurses should be able to distinguish the point where science ends and humane caring begins.
期刊論文
1.陳淳斌(19950800)。淺論邏輯實證主義。嘉義農專學報,42,137-153。  延伸查詢new window
2.宋光梁(19950400)。過度標準化簡論。工業財產權與標準,25,94-95。  延伸查詢new window
3.熊東亮(20010300)。當代科學哲學的省思。景文技術學院學報,11(下),141-145。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.McCormack, B.、Kitson, A.、Harvey, G.、Rycroft-Malone, J.、Titchen, A.、Seers, K.(2002)。Getting evidence into practice: The meaning of context。Journal of Advanced Nursing,38(1),94-104。  new window
5.Kornilov, O.、Glubovskaya, I.(1999)。Scientific world model-language world model: Parameters of opposition。Journal of Humanities Science of Tamkang University,3,95-111。  new window
6.Corner, J.(1991)。In search of more complete answers to research questions. Quantitative versus qualitative research methods: Is there a way forward?。Journal of Advanced Nursing,16(6),718-727。  new window
7.Rosenstock, L.、Lee, L. J.(2002)。Attacks on science: The risks to evidence-based policy。American Journal of Public Health,92(1),14-18。  new window
8.楊克平(19981000)。整合護理研究法的分歧--論方法上的三角交叉檢視法。護理研究,6(5),436-442。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林怡州(2000)。形式與實質--論私有財產與生產勞動(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.東銘洲(1989)。現代西方哲學源流。天津:天津教育。  延伸查詢new window
2.Chalmers, A. F.(1988)。What is the thing called-science?。Milton Keynes:Open University Press。  new window
3.Abdellah, F. G.、Levine, E.(1971)。Better patient care through nursing research。New York:Macmillan。  new window
4.Klee, R.(1997)。Introduction to the philosophy of science: Cutting nature at its seams。Oxford, NY:Oxford University。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lakatos, I.(1970)。Falsification and methodology of scientific research programs。Criticism and the growth of knowledge。Cambridge, MA:MIT press。  new window
2.劉仲冬(1996)。量與質社會研究的爭議與社會研究未來的走向及出路。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
3.胡幼慧(1996)。多元方法:三角交叉檢視法。質性研究--理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北市:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top