:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:皇甫湜的聖人觀
書刊名:中國文哲研究集刊
作者:方介 引用關係
作者(外文):Fang, Chieh
出版日期:2003
卷期:22
頁次:頁157-175
主題關鍵詞:聖人SageNaturePrincipleHeartDeed
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:110
     中唐時期,韓愈提倡古文,尊孔崇儒,排佛闢老,以明聖人之道為己任。皇甫走出韓愈門下,為文亦屢言聖道。但其關佛不若韓愈積極,在佛教衝擊之下,喜談心性,故雖仍以儒學為依歸,卻亦兼受佛、道影響,而自有新意。他的聖人觀要旨有三 : 其一謂「窮理盡性唯聖人能之」,而以孟、荀為一偏之說。其二謂聖與愚之分在「心」不在「?」。其三謂士「當以聖人為準的」,取法其「心」而不拘其「?」。較諸韓愈,更向內傾,更強調「心」的主導力量, 正足以見出儒學由漢至宋、由重外王轉向重內聖之過渡色彩。
      In the mid-Tang dynasty, Han Yu promoted guwen (ancient-style prose), elevated Confucius and Confucianism, condemned Buddhism and Daoism, and expounded on the teachings of the great sages of the past. Huangfu was Han's student, and he discoursed on the doctrines of the sages often, too. However, Huangfu argued against Buddhism less ardently than his teacher did. Buddhism was popular then and made an impact on Huangfu; Huangfu also discussed man's Heart and Nature, which were major Buddhist concerns of the time. Although Huangfu remained chiefly Confucian, he accommodated Buddhism and Daoism to a certain extent and contributed to Confucianism with these insights. The essential points of Huangfu's thought on the sage are as follows: 1. The sage is the only one who can fully grasp the Principle of the universe, and live out his Nature accordingly. The theories of Mencius and Xunzi are not complete enough in this regard. 2. The difference between the sage and the foolish is in the "inner heart," not in "outward deeds." 3. Scholars should take the sage as their exemplar, and follow the sage's inner heart, not his outward deeds. In short, compared to Han Yu, Huangfu emphasized the inner more strongly, and the Heart played a more important guiding role in the kind of Confucianism he envisioned. Huangfu reflected the transition and development of Confucianism from the Han dynasty to the Song with shifting priorities from the outer to the inner.
圖書
1.郭朋(1987)。壇經校釋。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(唐)孔穎達(1965)。禮記正義。禮記正義。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(南宋)朱熹(1983)。孟子集注。北京。  延伸查詢new window
4.荀況、楊倞、王先謙(1988)。荀子集解。華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.朱熹(1983)。論語集注。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.王叔岷(1988)。莊子校詮。中央研究院歷史語言研究所。  延伸查詢new window
7.歐陽修、宋祁(1976)。新唐書。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.張載(1979)。張載集。臺北:里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.董仲舒、蘇輿、鍾哲(1992)。春秋繁露義證。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.蘇軾、茅維、孔凡禮(1986)。蘇軾文集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.江國貞(1975)。傳論。皇甫持正學術研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳鼓應(1987)。老子註釋及評介。老子註釋及評介。香港。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(唐)孔穎達(1965)。周易正義,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(清)馬其昶(1975)。韓昌黎文集校注,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(唐)孔穎達(1965)。尚書正義,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.白珽(1966)。湛淵靜語,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.(唐)趙璘(1966)。因話錄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.皇甫湜(1986)。皇甫持正集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
1. 評:瀨戶宏著《中囯演劇の二十世紀:中囯話劇史概況》 (東京:東方書店, 1999)》
2. 評:歐麗娟《詩論紅樓夢》(臺北市:里仁書局, 2001)
3. 評:許麗芳《古典短篇小說之韻文》(臺北市:里仁書局, 2001)
4. 評:吳燕娜編,魏綸助編《中國婦女與文學論集》,第二集 (臺北縣板橋市:稻鄉出版社, 2001)
5. 評:黃進興《聖賢與聖徒--歷史與宗教論文集》(臺北市:允晨文化, 2001)
6. 評:Robert Hymes, Way and Byway: Taoism, Local Religion, and Models of Divinity in Sung and Modern China [«大道與小徑:宋代和現代中國的道教、地方宗教和神明的模式»](Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 2002)
7. 評:鐘鳴旦(Nicholas Standaert)編, Handbook of Christianity in China, Volume One: 635-1800 [«中國基督教手冊»上] (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2001)
8. 評:梁鳳清(Cecile Leung), «Etienne Fourmont (1683-1745), Oriental and Chinese Languages in Eighteenth-Century France» (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2002)
9. 評Bruno Barnhart and Joseph Wong eds., «Purity of Heart and Contemplation: A Monastic Dialogue between Christian and Asian Traditions»
10. 評:Andrew F. Jones, «Yellow Music: Media Culture and Colonial Modernity in the Chinese Jazz Age» (Durham and London : Duke University Press, 2001)
11. 陳寅恪的士大夫情結與學術取向[評:陳美延編《陳寅恪集》(北京市:生活.讀書.新知三聯書店, 2001~2002)]
12. 由「內聖」向「外王」的轉折--現代新儒家的政治哲學
13. 「天道」、「天命」、「王道」概念在近代日本的繼承和轉化--兼論中日帝王的神聖化
14. 殷周政教關係與周代治術中人文觀念之概念化
15. 評點、詮釋與接受--論吳儀一之《長生殿》評點
 
QR Code
QRCODE