:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:不同性質之高爾夫推桿與高爾夫球在快、慢果嶺推桿距離的影響分析
書刊名:大專體育學刊
作者:馬義傑 引用關係
作者(外文):Ma, I-chieh
出版日期:2003
卷期:5:1
頁次:頁217-229
主題關鍵詞:高爾夫推桿果嶺速度推桿桿面桿面斜度高爾夫球PutterSpeed of greensPutting loftPutting surfaceGolf ball
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:114
研究顯示,一個十八洞球局數中,一般的球友需花費總桿數的38-42%在推桿上。由此可看出推桿技術的優劣對高球成績的影響。而高爾夫是戶外運動,必然會受到風向、地形、氣候、保養及草種等種種狀態的左右,加上球友們不可能每天保持一樣的心理和生理條件來打球,所以針對這些不同的狀態和條件來做好相應的「球具搭配」就變得非常重要。本研究主要目的在於比較不同材質的高爾夫推桿桿面(軟鐵鍛造、內嵌鈹銅及內嵌樹脂)與桿面斜度(1°、3°、5°、7°、9°)對軟(三層球)、硬(雙層球)高爾夫球在快、中、慢果嶺(5-12級)的擊球滾動距離影響分析,進而探討與歸納出四種因子在交叉比對後的結果及其對高爾夫推桿距離所造成的影響。最後在依研究結果與結論提出建議,可供國內高爾夫運動的愛好者瞭解選擇推桿及用球的重要性,作為日後從事高爾夫運動的參考。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the analysis of puffing distance on different putter lofts, golf balls, green speeds, and puffing surface materials. Loft is the angle of the putter face when compared to the putting surface. The proper loft depends on the speed of the greens most frequently played. Three different materials were used as putting surfaces, and each surface was used at each of five positive angles (1、3、5、7、and 9 degrees) in this study. Analysis of results indicated that golfers who play on slower greens might benefit from putters with additional loft, while golfers who play on faster greens may benefit from decreased loft. In the golf balls test, the two piece ball (Top Flite XL) had a significantly higher level of rolling distance than the three piece ball (Titleist Tour Balata). However, in the putting surface materials test, the White Hot 2 Ball putter had a significantly higher level of rolling distance than the Titleist Studio Design 1.5 putter and the Dunlop Copper Insert puffer. There were small differences in performance for the Studio Design 1.5 putter and the Dunlop Copper Insert putter.
期刊論文
1.許雅典(2002)。打造希望工程。高球天下,116,150。  延伸查詢new window
2.Mickelson, P.(1997)。You can hole every putt。Golf Digest,4,26-37。  new window
3.戴耀宗(2002)。USGA差點系統及球場。亞洲高爾夫月刊,2002(3),44-49。  延伸查詢new window
4.Farricker, P.(1999)。聽了再買!11款超靜音推桿。高爾夫文摘,1999(2),68-71。  延伸查詢new window
5.馬義傑(20020600)。高爾夫短擊球的技巧與觀念。大專體育,60,10-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳恩仁(2002)。判斷果嶺速度的方法。高球天下,2002(7),151。  延伸查詢new window
7.魏玉珍(2002)。「最不可能的任務」中華男子首度在亞運封王。高爾夫文摘中文版,2002(11),88-91。  延伸查詢new window
8.景秋編輯部(1996)。果嶺高手的必修課程。景秋高爾夫,1996(11),80-81。  延伸查詢new window
9.野村廣利(2001)。5-7 度適合真的嗎?。Weekly Pargolf,7(10),55-59。  延伸查詢new window
10.綠德文化編輯部(2001)。New Balls。  延伸查詢new window
11.Coop, R.、Moirie, P.(2002)。克服短推桿恐懼症。國際高球雜誌,2002(7),44。  延伸查詢new window
12.Cameron, S.、Yun, H.、Phillips, D.(2002)。球星推桿的幕後推手。國際高球雜誌,2002(7),50-59。  延伸查詢new window
13.Elliot, J.(1999)。Equipment。Golf Digest,1,69。  new window
14.Firkins, G.(2001)。高球新課程。高球天下,107,90-92。  延伸查詢new window
15.Mckenzie, J.(2002)。比較推桿。高球天下,2002(8),112-114。  延伸查詢new window
16.翁秀梅(1990)。臺灣的果嶺速度為何都很慢?。高爾夫文摘中文版,1990(12),90-91。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Cochran, A. J.(1990)。Science, equipment development and standards。World Scientific Congress of Golf。London:E and FN Spon。  new window
2.Beasley, D.、Lemons, L. D.、Stanczak, M. B.(1999)。The effects of golf ball construction on putting。World Scientific Congress of Golf。London:E & FN Spon。  new window
3.Tierney, D.、Coop, R. H.(1999)。A bivariate probability model for putting proficiency。World Scientific Congress of Golf。London:E & FN Spon。385-394。  new window
圖書
1.Frank, J.(1999)。Precision putting。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
2.Faldo, Nick、Saunders, Vivien(1989)。Golf: The Winning Formula。London:Butler and Tanner Publishing, Inc.。  new window
3.高橋勝成、林樑(1993)。突破100高爾夫基礎篇。臺南:大坤書局有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Morrice, P.(2002)。PUTTING-推桿策略。台北市:商周出版。  延伸查詢new window
5.綠德文化編輯部(2002)。判斷果嶺速度的方法。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE