:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:海牙反彈道導彈擴散準則:國際規範之建立
書刊名:問題與研究
作者:袁易
作者(外文):Yuan, I
出版日期:2003
卷期:42:3
頁次:頁1-26
主題關鍵詞:海牙反彈道導彈擴散準則導彈建制出口管制透明化協議防擴散規範The hague code of conduct against ballistic missile proliferationMissile regimeExport controlTransparency agreementNon-proliferation norms
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(2) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:52
     「海牙準則」簽署國企圖通過「團體機構」(Corporate Agency)以形成具有制約和建構雙重屬性的規範來規約答署國的行為,進而通過學習來內化此一規範。此處所謂「團體機構」是指具備團體行動的觀念,使集體行動制度化且又可以認可集體行動的決策結構。換言之,答署國通過支持「海身準則」來反映出此一規範的作用。不簽署國則堅持,任何制度性的安排必須要以聯合國框架作為運作基礎,並通過非歧視性的國際條約來體現此一集體意志。關鍵在於如格建立一個可長可久的反彈道導彈擴散的共同信念,就是我們觀察「海牙準則」此一新興建制日後發展的首要了。本文將著眼於「海牙準則」此一規範化之目標建構、各種規範典範之競逐、規範之談判過程、規範之主要內涵、規範之批判,以及規範之實踐等面向並一一加以討論。
     The signatories states of "the Hague Code of Conduct against the Ballistic Missile Proliferation" recognize a need to create an international norm aimed at constraining as well as constraining as well as constructing state behavior by a corporate agency. As common knowledge, this code denotes an idea of corporate agency and a decision structure that both institutionalizes and authorizes collective action. The signatories states intend to build international support of such a predisposition. The non-signatories states, however, contend that nay institutional arrangement must operate under the framework of the United Nations by non-discriminatory international treaty to reflect the collective will of all states. This article addresses the goal setting, the competing versions, the negotiation process, and the contextual aspects of "the Hague code of Conduct against Ballistic Missile Proliferation."
期刊論文
1.Karp, Aaron(2000)。The Spread of Ballistic Missiles and the Transformation of Global Security。The Nonproliferation Review,7(3),106-122。  new window
2.Glaser, Charles L.、Fetter, Steve(2001)。National Missile Defense and the Future of U.S. Nuclear Weapon Policy。International Security,26(1),40-92。  new window
3.袁易(20010600)。對於Alexander Wendt有關國家身份與利益分析之批判:以國際防擴散建制為例。美歐季刊,15(2)=142,265-291。  延伸查詢new window
4.Beck, Michael(2000)。Reforming the Multilateral Export Control Regime。The Nonproliferation Review,7(2),91-103。  new window
5.Burkey, A. M. S.(1993)。International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda。American Journal of International Law,86(2),205-239。  new window
6.Fedorow, Y. E.(2000)。The Global Control System and the International Code of Conduct: Competition or Cooperation?。The Nonproliferation Review,9(2),30-37。  new window
7.Mutimer, D.(1998)。Reconstituting Security? The Practices of Proliferation Control。European Journal of International Relations,4(1),99-129。  new window
8.Newhouse, J.(1994)。The Missile Defense Debate。Foreign Affairs,July/ August。  new window
9.Ozga, D. A.(1994)。A Chronology of the MTCR。The Nonproliferation Review,1(2),66-73。  new window
10.Panah, Maryam H.(2002)。Social Revolution: The Elusive Emergence of an Agenda in International Relations。Review of International Studies,28,271-291。  new window
11.Weiss, K. G.(0)。The Limits of Diplomacy: Missile Proliferation, Diplomacy, and Defense。World Affairs。  new window
會議論文
1.Johnson, R.(2002)。Strategies for Addressing Space Security Concerns。Washington, DC。  new window
圖書
1.Gallagher, Nancy W.(1999)。The Politics of Verification。Baltimore:The John Hopkins University Press。  new window
2.Karp, Aaron(1996)。Ballistic Missile Proliferation: The Politics and Technics。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
3.(0)。Dangerous Weapons, Desperate States: Russia, Belarus, Kazakstan and Ukraine。Dangerous Weapons, Desperate States: Russia, Belarus, Kazakstan and Ukraine。New York, NY。  new window
4.Bowen, W. Q.(2000)。The Politics of Ballistic Missile Nonproliferation。The Politics of Ballistic Missile Nonproliferation。New York, NY。  new window
5.(2000)。Arms Control and Nonproliferation: Issues and Analyses。Arms Control and Nonproliferation: Issues and Analyses。Huntington, NY。  new window
6.(2000)。Repairing the Regime: Preventing the Spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction。Repairing the Regime: Preventing the Spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction。New York, NY。  new window
7.(1998)。Arms Control: New Approaches to Theory and Policy。Arms Control: New Approaches to Theory and Policy。London, UK。  new window
8.Graham, T.(2002)。Disarmament Sketches: Three Decades of Arms Control and International Law。Disarmament Sketches: Three Decades of Arms Control and International Law。Seattle, WA。  new window
9.(1996)。Space Power Interests。Space Power Interests。Boulder, CO。  new window
10.(2002)。Arms Control: Cooperative Security in a Changing Environment。Arms Control: Cooperative Security in a Changing Environment。Boulder, CO。  new window
11.(2002)。Contemporary Nuclear Debates: Missile Defense, Arms Control, and Arms Race in the Twenty-First Century。Contemporary Nuclear Debates: Missile Defense, Arms Control, and Arms Race in the Twenty-First Century。Cambridge, MA。  new window
12.McCarthy, T. V.(1999)。The MTCR。Nonproliferation Regimes at Risk, Occasional Paper No. 3。Monterey。  new window
13.Mistry, D.(2003)。Containing Missile Proliferation: Strategic Technology, Security Regimes and International Cooperation in Arms Control。Containing Missile Proliferation: Strategic Technology, Security Regimes and International Cooperation in Arms Control。Seattle, WA。  new window
14.Pikayev, A. A.(1998)。Russia, the U. S. and the Missile Technology Control Regime。Russia, the U. S. and the Missile Technology Control Regime。Oxford。  new window
15.Potter, W. C.(1994)。The International Missile Bazaar: the New Suppliers' Network。The International Missile Bazaar: the New Suppliers' Network。Boulder, CO。  new window
16.Rueckert, G. L.(1998)。On-site Inspection in Theory and Practice: A Primer on Modern Arms Control Regimes。On-site Inspection in Theory and Practice: A Primer on Modern Arms Control Regimes。Westport, CT。  new window
17.Wainhouse, D. W.(1999)。Arms Control Agreements: Designs for Verification and Organization。Arms Control Agreements: Designs for Verification and Organization。Baltimore, MD/ London, UK。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top