:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:多元智慧的統整與學科領域教學
書刊名:臺東大學教育學報
作者:徐靜嫻
作者(外文):Hsu, Ching-hsien
出版日期:2003
卷期:14(下)
頁次:頁1-22
主題關鍵詞:多元智慧課程統整Multiple intelligencesCurriculum integration
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:21
多元智慧理論不僅打破傳統對智慧的理解,增加了教師啟發與有效教授異質學生的可能性,它更是提供了教師一個新的途徑統整目前的學科或領域的教學。本文旨在探討 目前國內教師利用多元智慧理論來統整課程教授學科或領域的知識與技能時,普遍所犯的兩個迷思。第一個迷思及對不同學科與多元智慧中特定智慧間關係理解的偏差,第二個迷思則是有關於教師對各種智慧內涵理解的過於粗略,以致於矮化各學科學或領域的教學專業。本文首先釐清學科與智慧二者涵意的不同,並解釋粗略應用多元智慧的現象與問題。其次,重申Gardner將多元智慧理論運用到學科或領域教學的兩種方式,並據此提出種強調不同智慧的教學策略與方法以提供教師做為教授多元智慧的切入點。最後,針對教師運用多元智慧理論為基礎統整課程的作法,提供幾點建議。
Multiple intelligences (MI) theory not only reconstructs our conception of intelligence, but also provides an approach to teaching disciplinary knowledge and skills for students of diverse backgrounds. This paper discusses tow major misconceptions held by teachers who use MI theory to integrate current curriculum in school. The first misconception is related to the relationship between the particular “intelligence” and the “discipline”. The second one is a false application of MI theory, which as a consequence leads to a degrading of teaching quality. This paper first explains the differences between the intelligences and the disciplines so as to clarify the two above-mentioned misconceptions. Second, two principles suggested by Gardner to emphasize multiple intelligences in teaching disciplinary knowledge are presented. Finally, several teaching strategies are introduced to put the two principles in practice.
圖書
1.Erikson, E. H.(1993)。Identity: Youth and Crisis。New York:W. W. Norton & Company。  new window
2.林尹(1971)。文字學概說。臺北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Miller, J. P.、Cassie, J. R. B.、Drake, S. M.(1990)。Holistic learning: A teacher's guide to integrated studies。Toronto:The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education。  new window
4.Campbell, Joseph、Moyers, Bill D.、Flowers, Betty Sue(1988)。The power of myth: With Bill Moyers。New York:Doubleday。  new window
5.張春興(1999)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.Good, T. L.、Brophy, J.、李素卿(1999)。當代教育心理學。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
7.Gardner, Howard、李心瑩(2000)。再建多元智慧:21世紀的發展前景與實際應用。臺北市:遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.Goodman, K. S.(1986)。What's Whole in Whole Language?: A Parent/Teacher Guide to Children's Learning。Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann Educational Books, Inc.。  new window
9.Wolfinger, D. M.、Stockhard, J. W.(1997)。Elementary methods: An integrated curriculum。New York:Longman。  new window
10.Campbell, Linda、Campbell, Bruce、Dickinson, Dee、郭俊賢、陳淑惠(1999)。多元智慧的教與學。遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.Armstrong, Thomas、李平(1997)。經營多元智慧:開展以學生為中心的教學。遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.Gardner, H.(1993)。Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice。New York, NY:Harper Collins。  new window
13.Jarolimek, J.、Parker, W. C.(1993)。Social Studies in Elementary Education。New York:Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
其他
1.Campbell, J.(1973)。The hero with a thousand faces。  new window
2.Cordeiro, P.(1992)。Whole learning: Whole language and content in the upper elementary grades。  new window
3.Coward, F., Bera, S., Robinson, D., & Hsu, C.(2002)。The roles of native language and cultural background on the processing of adjunct displays。  new window
4.Hennings D.(1986)。Communication in action: Teaching the language arts (3rd ed.)。  new window
5.Kivakaruni, C. B.(1993)。Multitude: cross-cultural readings for writers。  new window
6.Maddern, E.(1990)。What fifteen year olds need。  new window
7.Perkins, P.(1995)。The ABC's of whole language。  new window
8.Rewey, K. L., Dansereau, D. F., & Peel, J. L.(1991)。Knowledge maps and information processing strategies。  new window
9.Robinson, D. H., Katayama, A. D., & Fan, A.(1996)。Evidence for conjoint retention encoded from spatial adjunct displa ys。  new window
10.Tchudi, S.(1994)。Integrated language arts in the elementary school。  new window
11.Zarbiwski, M.(1990)。Learning about biographies: A reading-and-writing approach for children。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE