:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣自動化產業廠商對上游供應商選擇因素之研究--工具機產業之例
書刊名:文大商管學報
作者:黃營杉齊德彰
作者(外文):Hwang, Ing-sanChi, Der-jang
出版日期:2003
卷期:8:2
頁次:頁25-47
主題關鍵詞:供應鏈管理自動化產業工具機產業工具機Supply chain managementAutomation industryMachine tool industryMachine tools
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:15
隨著供應鏈管理相關議題逐漸受到重視,為了提高顧客滿意與利潤,自動化產業必須設法降低生產的前置時間與存貨,而選擇優秀的供應商往往成為自動化產業獲取競爭優勢的重要關鍵。台灣自動化產業中之工具機產業發展,已成為世界第六大生產國及第五大出口國,在世界舞台中佔有一席之地。台灣工具機廠商的成本結構中約有62%的製造成本乃是因為外包的供應商所產生的成本,而委外是台灣工具機產業普遍的現象。台灣工具機產業的供應商種類可分為:國外重要零組件廠商、國內重要零組件廠商及國內重要製程加工等三種。當外包的供應商所供應的產品品質無法提升時,工具機業者取得的零組件品質則受到影響,當然組合出來的產品品質便無法保證。因此,台灣工具機產業相當重視其供應商的選擇,也由於這些供應商的優劣將影響著台灣工具機產業的盛衰。因此,本研究針對工具機產業的三種上游供應商:國外重要零組件廠商、國內重要零組件廠商及國內重要製程加工廠商,以十五項重要選擇因素項目進行問卷調查,探討其選擇上游供應商之主要因素。研究結果發現,國外重要零組件廠商的選擇因素歸納為:價值能力、產品能力及作業能力;國內重要零組件廠商之選擇因素歸納為:信譽能力、技術能力及顧客能力;而國內重要製程加工廠商之選擇因素歸納為:作業能力、技術能力及顧客能力。本研究可供政府與產業研究單位、工具機產業廠商業者及相關學術研究參考。
Today as supply chain management related issues is holding the increasing limelight, automation industry must try to minimize the preliminary period and inventory and choose superior suppliers. These factors very often become the predominating key in competition. In terms of the machine tool development among the automation industry, Taiwan has ranked among the world’s Top Six, as the 5th giant exporter, playing a pivotal role in the world stage. Out of the manufacturing costs of Taiwan’s machine tool makers, 62% prove to be the costs for the contract-out suppliers. In Taiwan’s machine tool industry, contract-out production is a common phenomenon. Suppliers to Taiwan’s machine tool industry can be classified into three categories: Manufacturers of foreign key parts and components, manufacturers of key domestic parts and components and key domestic processors. While the contractors could not upgrade quality of their products, the quality of parts and components supplied to the machine tool manufacturers would be untowardly affected, making the quality of the assembled products questionable. In Taiwan, therefore, those machine tool manufacturers are keenly watchful of the choices of their suppliers which will even tell the fate of their future. The present study just aims at the suppliers of the three categories, i.e., Manufacturers of foreign key parts and components, manufacturers of key domestic parts and components and key domestic processors through questionnaire surveys in fifteen key items to probe into the key factors they choose upstream suppliers. The findings indicate that manufacturers of foreign key parts and components focus on competence in values, product competence and operation competence; manufacturers of key domestic parts and components focus on competence in goodwill, technological competence and customer-oriented competence while key domestic processors focus on operation competence, technological competence and customer-oriented competence. The findings yielded out of the present study will function as handy reference to the government, business concerns’ research units, machine tool manufacturers as well as academic research institutions.
期刊論文
1.Wisner, Joel D.、Tan, Keah Choon(2000)。Supply Chain Management and Its Impact on Purchasing。The Journal of Supply Chain Management,36(4),33-42。  new window
2.Wilson, Elizabeth J.(1994)。The Relative Importance of Supplier Selection Criteria: A Review and Update。International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management,30(2),34-41。  new window
3.Dickson, G. W.(1966)。An analysis of vendor selection system and decisions。Journal of Purchasing,2(1),5-17。  new window
4.Das, A.、Narasimhan, R.(2000)。Purchasing competence and its relationship with manufacturing performance。The Journal of Supply Chain Management,36(2),17-28。  new window
5.Donaldson, B.(1994)。Supplier selection criteria on the service dimension。European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management,1(4),209-217。  new window
6.Stevens, Graham C.(1989)。Integrating the Supply Chain。International Journal of Physical Distribution and Materials Management,19(8),3-8。  new window
7.Evans, R. H.(1982)。Product Involvement and Industrial Buying。Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management,18,23-28。  new window
8.Tracey, M.、Tan, C. L.(2001)。Empirical analysis of supplier selection and involvment, customer satisfaction, and firm performance。Supply Chain Management: An International Journal,6(4),174-188。  new window
9.Tan, K. C.、Handfield, R. B.、Kannan, V. R.(1998)。Supply Chain Management: Supplier Performance and Firm Performance。International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management,34(3),2-9。  new window
10.Handfield, Robert B.、Ragatz, Gary L.、Petersen, Kenneth J.、Monczka, Robert M.(1999)。Involving Suppliers in New Product Development。California Management Review,42(1),59-82。  new window
11.Hayes, R.、Wheelwright, S. C.(1985)。Competing Through Manufacturing。Harvard Business Review,63(1),99-109。  new window
12.Vonderembse, M. A.、Tracey, M.(1999)。The impact of the supplier selection criteria and supplier involvement on manufacturing performance。The Journal of Supply Chain Management: A Global Review of Purchasing and Supply,35(3),33-39。  new window
13.Lehmann, D. R.、O'Shaughnessy, J.(1974)。Difference in Attribute Importance for Different Industrial Products。Journal of Marketing,38(2),36-42。  new window
14.Weber, Charles A.、Current, John R.、Benton, W. C.(1991)。Vendor selection criteria and methods。European Journal of Operational Research,50(1),2-18。  new window
15.Goffin, K.、Szwejczewski, M.、New, C.(1997)。Managing Suppliers: When Fewer Can Mean More。International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management,27(7),422-436。  new window
16.Lehmann, Donald R.、O'Shaughnessy, J. L.(1982)。Decision criteria used in buying different categories of products。Journal of purchasing and Materials Management,18(1),9-14。  new window
17.Nydick, Robert L.、Hill, Ronald Paul(1992)。Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure。Journal of Supply Chain Management,28(2),31-36。  new window
18.Ellram, L. M.(1990)。The Supplier Selection Decision in Strategic Partnerships。Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management,26(4),8-14。  new window
學位論文
1.紀秋煌(2002)。通路控制力、通路類型與通路績效之研究─以兩岸台商工具機業供應鏈為研究對象(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳俊誼(2001)。採購部門參與、供應商選擇標準、供應商發展活動與新產品開發績效關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Christopher, Martin(1992)。Logistic and Supply Chain Management: Strategies for Reducing Costs and Improving Services。London:Pitman。  new window
2.王正青(2002)。台灣工具機產業現況與未來發展。財團法人工具機發展基金會。  延伸查詢new window
3.王正青(2003)。台灣工具機產業現況報導。財團法人工具機發展基金會。  延伸查詢new window
4.Carter, J. R.(1993)。Purchasing: Continued Improvement Through Integration。Homewood, Illinois:Business one Irwin。  new window
5.Laudon, C. K.、Laudon, P. J.(1998)。Management Information System: New Approaches to Organization and Technology。N.J.:Prentice Hall。  new window
6.David, F. R.(1997)。Competing Through Supply Chain Management: Creating Market-Winning Strategies Through Supply Chain Partnerships。London:Chapman & Hall。  new window
7.Handfield, R.、Monczka, R.、Trent, R.(1998)。Purchasing and Supply Chain Management。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
8.Guilford, Joy Paul(1965)。Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education。McGraw-Hill。  new window
圖書論文
1.王建彬(2003)。全球主要工具機產銷國及市場比較。2003機械五金年鑑。台北:聯合報系。  延伸查詢new window
2.張燦輝(2003)。全球工具機的技術發展現況與來趨勢。2003機械五金年鑑。台北:聯合報系。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡新源(2003)。我國機械工業發展概況。2003機械五金年鑑。台北:聯合報系。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉信宏(2003)。全球工具機產業概況。2003機械五金年鑑。台北:聯合報系。  延伸查詢new window
5.Krause, D. R.、Pagell, M.、Curkovic, S.(1998)。Purchasing Strategy: An Empirical Analysis。Proceedings 1998 of the Decision Science Institute。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE