:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:性犯罪加害人之處遇--國內外現行主要制度評述
書刊名:犯罪與刑事司法研究
作者:鄭添成陳英明楊士隆 引用關係
作者(外文):Zheng, Victor, T. C.Chen, Ying-mingYang, Shu-lung
出版日期:2004
卷期:2
頁次:頁78-109
主題關鍵詞:性侵害犯罪再犯預防處遇
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:86
國內現行法律規定,對性侵害罪犯加害人之處遇,分為刑前強制鑑定治療、刑中強制診療、刑後身心治療及輔導教育三種,分由法務部及內政部負責執行。而此三階段之治療輔導分屬不同體系,呈現不同問題。國內性罪犯治療制度,參究其立法原意,係沿襲美國性罪犯治療方案,但由於未從監獄至社區、法制至措施整體規劃,致使實施以來,上無有效監獄治療可資延續,下無社區資源可資結合,且相關評估工具或本土治療或輔導模式又未建立,所以雖各單位對制度之執行有著高度熱誠與配合,但其整體成效仍有待檢討改進,尤其刑法修正後,社區治療與刑前鑑定與治療如何配合、假釋前是否應再經治療評估,均應從結構考量,相關機關如無法共同從理論至實務,從刑前、刑中及刑後建立一貫之評估、治療及輔導模式,則各自為政下將使國內有限之治療及輔導資源,無法發揮有效功能。本文企圖從美英加等國方案經驗,瞭解先進國家性罪犯治療如何從監獄至社區成一連貫體系,並檢討國內應如何建立修正相關制度,以期有效落實性罪犯再犯預防之立法原意。
The purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate the treatment system for sex offenders in Taiwan. We tried to explore a little further into the actual effect of system by analyzing the strength and weakness of the treatment program. However, We are not concerned here with the causes and patterns of sex crimes. We search and collect literature about the treatment system for sex offenders in other countries. Besides, we analyze their successful experiences and their actual effects of sex offender treatment policy. We discuss the subject form the point of view including pre-penalty, imprisonment, and to release on parole. We analyzing the controversial issues and the difficult position that were met in practice by make sense of the treatment program practitioners' experiences subjectively. The importance of sex offender treatment program cannot be overemphasized. The competitiveness of a nation was deeply affected generally by the public security in a society. We could make a better sex offender treatment system by refer to the experiences of other countries. By collecting the experiences and challenges that were met in practice, the study is expected to offer effective suggestions for the improvement of our sex offender treatment system, and finally eliminate the harm of sex offense.
期刊論文
1.周煌智、郭壽宏、陳筱萍、張永源(20000400)。性侵害加害人的特徵與治療策略。公共衛生,27(1),1-14。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Holmes, R. M.(1983)。The sex offender and the criminal justice system。Springfield, IL:Charles C Thomas。  new window
其他
1.中華民國幸福家庭促進協會(2000)。「性侵害犯罪加害人輔導教育內涵之研究」總報告。  延伸查詢new window
2.內政部性侵害委員會(2000)。性侵害加害人鑑定、評估及治療方案研討會會議手冊。  延伸查詢new window
3.台灣台北監獄(1998)。妨害風化罪受刑人強制診療業務之研究。  延伸查詢new window
4.台灣台北監獄(1998)。台灣台北監獄妨害風化罪受刑人強制診療業務計畫書。  延伸查詢new window
5.王家駿(2001)。性侵害再犯之防治。  延伸查詢new window
6.林明傑(1999)。美國性罪犯治療的理論及技術。  延伸查詢new window
7.林明傑(2000)。性罪犯之心理評估暨危險評估。  延伸查詢new window
8.林慈玲(2002)。我國性罪犯社區身心治療方案。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳若璋(2002)。性罪犯心理學。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳英明(2002)。性侵害加害人接受身心治療與輔導教育經驗之研究。  延伸查詢new window
11.楊士隆、吳芝儀(2000)。認知行為處遇法在犯罪矯正上之應用。  延伸查詢new window
12.楊添圍(2001)。性侵害犯罪者之處遇及其他。  延伸查詢new window
13.劉志如、陳若璋(2001)。以上癮理論探索性罪犯犯罪歷程。  延伸查詢new window
14.鄭瑞隆(2001)。性侵害與家庭暴力防治體系現行困境分析。  延伸查詢new window
15.Cumming, G.(2002)。Judical Treatment for Sex Offenders in the United States。  new window
16.Cumming, G. & Buell M.(1998)。Supervision of the Sex Offender. The Safer Society Press。  new window
17.Cumming, G. & McGrath R. J.(2002)。Outcome of the Vermont Department of Correction Intensive Prison Treatment。  new window
18.Cumming, G. & McGrath R. J.(2002)。External Supervision – How can it increase the Effectiveness of Relapse Prevention?。  new window
19.Eccles, A. & Walker W.(2002)。Community--Based Treatment with Sexual Offenders。  new window
20.Fabiano, E. A., Porporino F. J. & Robinson D.(1991)。Canada’s Cognitive Skills Program Corrects Offenders’ Faculty Thinking. Corrections Today。  new window
21.Gorden, A. & Porporino F. J.(1991)。Canada Targets Sex Offenders According to Treatment Needs。  new window
22.Marshall, W. L. & Anderson D.(2002)。Cognitive Behavioral Treatment of Sexual Offenders。  new window
23.Marshall, W. L.,Hudson, S.M. & Ward, T..(1992)。Principle and Practice of Relapse Prevention。  new window
24.Nelson, C., Miner, M., Marques, J., Russell, K. & Achterkirchen, J.(1989)。Relapse Prevention: A cognitive-behavior model for treatment of the rapist and child molester。  new window
25.Raynor, P. & Vanstone M.(1996)。Reasoning and Rehabilitation in Britain: The Results of the Straight Thinking on Probation (STOP) Programme。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE