:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:後設資料註冊中心現況發展之研究
書刊名:教育資料與圖書館學
作者:陳亞寧 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Ya-ning
出版日期:2004
卷期:41:3
頁次:頁351-371
主題關鍵詞:後設資料註冊中心資料綱要MetadataSchemataRegistry
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:20
     本文研究目的在探討國際上現有metadata registries的設計與發展,以達成metadata標準相關資訊的再利用與互通性。本文採取個案研究法,以數位圖書館metadata為範圍,選取12個研究樣本進行分析。本文研究發現主要有五項:第一「多數metadata registries (MDRs)已臻至機讀的階段。第二,涵蓋標準數量上有單一與多數兩種。第三,描述對象除了以典藏品為主外,也擴及至人與機構;資訊單元(information granularity)主要包含標準、元素與控制詞彙三個層級。第四,所有MDRs皆為metadata元素間的關係加以標引,只有一些針對標準與元素間的關係予以建立,甚至展延至控制詞彙,而這些MDRs通常不採用用ISO/IEC 11179。第五,發展MDRs有兩大取向,一是採取資料元素方式,通常採用ISO,資料描述十分詳盡;二是採取metadata元素方式,資料描述十分簡易。
     How to reuse and interoperate the information between various metadata standards becomes an important issue for digital library projects and metadata registries (MDRs) are employed as a workable approach around the world. This paper aims to take a revive on current development of MDRs, by adopted case study as research methodology to examine twelve case. Consequently, five findings are offered in the following:1.most MDRs can be generalized into machine readable MDRs. 2.Some MDRs include elements from a single standard, and some from multiple ones. 3.MDRs focus on cultural heritage objects, but now has been expanded to include institutes and users. Information granularity that MDRs handle is generalized into metadata standard, element and encoded scheme. 4.Relationships between elements are common to all practices, but relationships between standards, elements and encoded schemes are not applied to all. 5.The approach of MDRs description is toward two types: data elements and metadata elements. The former one has a preference for comprehensive description, and the latter one is toward appropriate description for practical requirements and is separated into various identities instead of all in one.
期刊論文
1.Polydoratou, P.、Nicholas, D.(2001)。Familiarity with and use of metadata formats and metadata registries amongst those working in diverse professional communities within the information sector。Asllb Proceedings,53(8),309-324。  new window
2.Heery, Rachael、Wagner, Harry(2002)。A metadata registry for the semantic web。D-Lib Magazine,8(5)。  new window
會議論文
1.Heery, Rachael(2002)。Application profiles: Interoperable friend or foe?。Germany。  new window
2.Heery, Rachael(2002)。The MEG Registry and SCART: Complementary tools for creation, discovery and re-use of metadata schemas127。  new window
3.Nagamori, Mitsuharu(2001)。A multilingual metadata schema registry based on RDF schema。  new window
其他
1.Baker, Thomas。Principles of metadata registries: A white paper of the DELOS working group on registries。  new window
2.Bargmeyer, Bruce(1997)。Joint Workshop on Metadata Registries: Workshop Report。  new window
3.Patel, Manjula(2001)。SCHEMAS: Second Workshop Report。  new window
4.Bargmeyer, Bruce(2003)。Concept Presentation: Sixth Open Forum on Metadata Registries。  new window
5.EU-NSF Working Group on Metadata(1998)。Metadata for Digital Libraries: A Research Agenda。  new window
6.Wagner, Harry,Heery, Rachael(2001)。DCMI Open Metadata Registry Purpose and Scope: Phase 1。  new window
7.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare(2000)。The knowledgebase: Australia’s health, community services and housing metadata registry。  new window
8.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare(2000)。About the knowledgebase。  new window
9.Heery, Rachael(2002)。Functional Requirements for CORES Schema Creation and Registration Tool。  new window
10.Heery, Rachael(2001)。Draft DCMI Open Metadata Registry Functional Requirements。  new window
11.Durblin Core Metadata Initiative(2002)。DCMI Registry Working Group。  new window
12.Hooper, Tracey,Knight, Virginia,Dixon, Tim(2000)。DESIRE Integrated Toolkit。  new window
13.Pendleton, Michael(2003)。Overview of EPA’s System of Registries。  new window
14.Fitzwater, Larry(2003)。EPA’s system of Registries: Tools for Supporting Environmental Information Integration and EPA’s Metadata Strategy。  new window
15.Federal Geographic Data Committee。Questions and Answers。  new window
16.Federal Geographic Data Committee(2002)。The Clearinghouse Registry。  new window
17.Federal Geographic Data Committee(2002)。Summary Report: FGDC Coordination Group Meeting。  new window
18.Heery, Rachael,Beckett, Dave(2002)。Registry for Educational Metadata Schemas: A Proposal to the JISC and BECTa from UKOLN and the ILRT。  new window
19.Braun, Jurgen(2003)。SUB Gottingen Metaform。  new window
20.Day, Michael(2000)。The ROADS Metadata Registry。  new window
21.UK Office for Library and Information(2002)。Registry。  new window
22.UK Office for Library and Information(2000)。SCHEMAS: Project Objectives。  new window
23.Health informatics standard board。Welcome to the United States Health Information Knowledgebase。  new window
24.Dekkers, Makx(2002)。Issues in Cross-Standard Interoperability。  new window
25.Leviston, Tony(2001)。Discussion Paper: Metadata Registry Requirements and Realities。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE