本研究之目的昌在了解亞洲男子排球四強之接發球形態與效果是否有差異？研究對象以2001年亞洲男子排球四強挑戰賽之六場比賽為內容，研究工具為自編之排球接將球形態與效果記錄表，資料分析的方法有二，一為描述性統計，以次數及百分比的方式說明各隊接發球之形態典故呆；另一為單因子變異數分析(one-way ANOVA)，用以考驗各隊接發球形態與效果是否有差異。研究結果指出：一、在接發球形態方面，韓國隊及中華台北隊自由球員接發球比率佔50.3%以上，中國隊及日本隊自由球員接發球比率佔36.7%。二、在接發球成功率方面，各隊自由球員接發球成功率皆超過81.3%，除中華台北隊一般球員接發球成功率為60.8%，其他各隊一般球員接發球成功率超過77.5%。三、在接發球失誤率方面，各隊自由球員接發球失誤率低於4.0%以下，除中華台北隊一般球員接發球失誤率為12.3%，其他各隊一般球員接發球失誤率低於3.0%以下。四、在接發球效果方面，中國隊整體之接發球優於中華台北隊；在自由球員方面，各隊自由球員之接發球沒有差異。在一般球員方面，中國隊、韓國隊及日本隊一般球員之接發球皆優於中華台北隊。

The purpose of this study was to understand the different hits and effectiveness of using libero in the 2001 Asia Men's Volleyball Championship. Data was collected from subjects who participated in the six games and the research instrument used was a recording table that measured the different hits and effectiveness using libero, which we constructed. Descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA were used to analyze the data. The results were: (l)In the different hits, the percentage of the hits by libero for the Koreans and the Chinese Taipei were higher than 50.3% and for the Chinese and Japanese they were higher than 36.7%. (2) The percentages of hitting by libero in all teams were higher than 81.3%. The successful percentages of hitting by general players from Korea, China, and Japan were higher than 77.5% where Chinese Taipei was only 60.8%. (3) Missed hits percentage of the hits recorded by libero in all teams were lower than 4.0%. In the missed hits the percentage of hits recorded by libero for general players were lower than 3.0% and for Chinese Taipei it was 12.3% making them the highest missing percentage. (4) In the effectiveness of hitting China was significantly better than Chinese Taipei, the scores of hitting recorded by libero in all teams showed no significant difference. The hits by general players from China, Korea and Japan were significantly better than those of Chinese Taipei.