:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:營建業共同代理問題之分析
書刊名:建築學報
作者:洪維廷林森田 引用關係
作者(外文):Hung, Wei-tingLin, Sen-tyan
出版日期:2004
卷期:45
頁次:頁81-98
主題關鍵詞:營建業代理問題不動產景氣機會行為Construction industryAgency problemReal estate business cycleOpportunistic behavior
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:48
     有鑒於近年來營建業屢賈傳出經營危機或大股東掏空公司資產等代理問題,本文根據營建業特性,基於代理理論建立共同代理模式,探討營建業中小股東、大股東兼經理人,以及債權人間的代理結構,並分析的大股東兼經理人決策的因素,且嘗試提出解決代理問題的可能方式,以彌補以往文獻於探討營建業組織代理問題時,將其視為單一代理結構加以處理的不足。研究結果發現,影響營建業大股東夫經理人決策的因素為:(1)小股東及債權人監督大股東兼經理人所必須支付之單位交易成本,(2)大股東兼經理人在兩種任務上的相對生產力,(3)大股東兼經理人持股比例,以及(4)兩種任務間之互補或替代性質等。在營建業共同代理結構下,透過下列兩種方鐘,將可改善共同代理結構下對小股東及債權人所造成的可能損失;(1)營建業股東與債權人採取合作策略,共同提供誘因契約給大股東兼經理人,(2)經由其他相關參與者如政府及外部董監事提供有關營建業大東兼經理人的相關訊息。
     In view of the serious agency problems of construction industry in recent years, this study, based on common agency concept, instead of the equity agency and debt agency concepts adopted by previous studies, investigates the agency problems in construction industry. A common agency model, according to the characteristics of construction industry, is built to discuss the agency problems so as to provide way of solution. The factors which influence the manager (the large shareholder) are: firstly, the transaction cost which the small shareholder and the debt-holder incurred in the policing and monitoring the manager; secondly, the relative productivity of manager between two tasks; thirdly, the shareholding ratio of the manager; finally, the complement or substitute relationship of the task. If the manager has large shareholding ratio, two approaches can be employed to reduce the agency problems. Firstly, the small shareholders and debt-holders should adopt the cooperative strategy to provide the incentive contract. Secondly, government authorities and outside directors should strengthen the policing mechanism and provide more information related to manager to small shareholders and debt-holders.
期刊論文
1.王明德、張登傑(19990900)。營建業組織中代理問題之分析。建築學報,30,27-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Chaganti, R.、Damanpour, F.(1991)。Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance。Strategic Management Journal,12(7),479-491。  new window
3.McConnell, John J.、Servaes, Henri(1990)。Additional Evidenceon Equity Ownership and Corporate Value。Journal of Financial Economics,27(2),595-612。  new window
4.Holderness, Clifford G.、Sheehan, Dennis P.(1988)。The Role of Majority Shareholders in Publicly-Held Corporations: An Exploratory Analysis。Journal of Financial Economics,20(1/2),317-346。  new window
5.Mezzetti, Claudio(1997)。Common Agency with Horizontally Differentiated Principals。Rand Journal of Economics,28(2),323-345。  new window
6.Olsen, T. E.、Torsvik, G.(1995)。Intertemporal common Agency and Organizational Design: How Much Decentralization。European Economic Review,39,1405-1428。  new window
7.Crutchley, C. E.、Hansen, R. S.(1989)。A test of the agency theory of managerial ownership, corporate leverage, and corporate dividends。Financial Management,18(4),36-46。  new window
8.Bernheim, B. D.、Whinston, M. D.(1986)。Common Agency。Econometrica,54(4),923-942。  new window
9.Stiglitz, Joseph E.(1985)。Credit markets and the control of capital。Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,17(2),133-152。  new window
10.Morck, Randall、Shleifer, Andrei、Vishny, Robert W.(1988)。Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis。Journal of Financial Economics,20(1/2),293-315。  new window
11.Stulz, René M.(1988)。Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control。Journal of Financial Economics,20(1/2),25-54。  new window
12.Fama, Eugene F.(1980)。Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm。Journal of Political Economy,88(2),288-307。  new window
13.Demsetz, Harold(1983)。The structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm。The Journal of Law & Economics,26(2),375-390。  new window
14.Shleifer, Andrei、Vishny, Robert W.(1997)。A survey of corporate governance。The Journal of Finance,52(2),737-783。  new window
15.Jensen, Michael C.、Meckling, William H.(1976)。Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure。Journal of Financial Economics,3(4),305-360。  new window
16.洪維廷(20010900)。共有代理結構與政策執行--以臺灣公共設施保留地之政策執行為例。中國行政,70,17-36。  延伸查詢new window
17.Hill, C. W. L.、Shnell, S. A.(1989)。Effects on Ownership Structure and Control on Corporate Productivity。The Academy of Management Journal,32(1),25-46。  new window
18.Jahera, J. S., Jr.、Lloyd, W. P.、Goldstein, S. J.(1986)。The Relation between Returns, Ownership Structure, and Market Value。The Journal of Financial Research,9,171-177。  new window
19.Baumol, W. J.(1962)。On the Theory of Expansion of the Firm。The American Economic Review,52,1078-1087。  new window
20.Henricks, M.(1991)。The Power of Partnering。Small Business Reports,16(6),46-57。  new window
21.Laffont, J.、Martimort, D.(1997)。The Firm as a Multicontract organization。Journal of Economics and Management Strategy,6(2),201-234。  new window
22.Murali, R.、Welch, J. B.(1989)。Agents, Owners, Control and Performance。Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,24,385-398。  new window
會議論文
1.葉銀華、Lee, T. S.(1999)。Family Control, Board Composition and Corporate Performance: Corporate Governance in Taiwan。Taipei。  new window
學位論文
1.廖佳雯(1997)。營建業上市公司代理問題之初步探討,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Cyert, R. M.、March, J. G.(1992)。A Behavioral Theory of the Firm。Blackwell Business。  new window
2.Dixit, Avinash K.(1996)。The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction-Cost Politics Perspective。MIT Press。  new window
3.Koutsoyiannis, A.(1979)。Modern Microeconomics。London, UK:New York, NY:Macmillan。  new window
4.Varian, Hal R.(1992)。Microeconomic Analysis。W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE