資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(13.58.3.72)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
營建業共同代理問題之分析
書刊名:
建築學報
作者:
洪維廷
/
林森田
作者(外文):
Hung, Wei-ting
/
Lin, Sen-tyan
出版日期:
2004
卷期:
45
頁次:
頁81-98
主題關鍵詞:
營建業
;
代理問題
;
不動產景氣
;
機會行為
;
Construction industry
;
Agency problem
;
Real estate business cycle
;
Opportunistic behavior
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(
1
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
1
共同引用:
2
點閱:48
有鑒於近年來營建業屢賈傳出經營危機或大股東掏空公司資產等代理問題,本文根據營建業特性,基於代理理論建立共同代理模式,探討營建業中小股東、大股東兼經理人,以及債權人間的代理結構,並分析的大股東兼經理人決策的因素,且嘗試提出解決代理問題的可能方式,以彌補以往文獻於探討營建業組織代理問題時,將其視為單一代理結構加以處理的不足。研究結果發現,影響營建業大股東夫經理人決策的因素為:(1)小股東及債權人監督大股東兼經理人所必須支付之單位交易成本,(2)大股東兼經理人在兩種任務上的相對生產力,(3)大股東兼經理人持股比例,以及(4)兩種任務間之互補或替代性質等。在營建業共同代理結構下,透過下列兩種方鐘,將可改善共同代理結構下對小股東及債權人所造成的可能損失;(1)營建業股東與債權人採取合作策略,共同提供誘因契約給大股東兼經理人,(2)經由其他相關參與者如政府及外部董監事提供有關營建業大東兼經理人的相關訊息。
以文找文
In view of the serious agency problems of construction industry in recent years, this study, based on common agency concept, instead of the equity agency and debt agency concepts adopted by previous studies, investigates the agency problems in construction industry. A common agency model, according to the characteristics of construction industry, is built to discuss the agency problems so as to provide way of solution. The factors which influence the manager (the large shareholder) are: firstly, the transaction cost which the small shareholder and the debt-holder incurred in the policing and monitoring the manager; secondly, the relative productivity of manager between two tasks; thirdly, the shareholding ratio of the manager; finally, the complement or substitute relationship of the task. If the manager has large shareholding ratio, two approaches can be employed to reduce the agency problems. Firstly, the small shareholders and debt-holders should adopt the cooperative strategy to provide the incentive contract. Secondly, government authorities and outside directors should strengthen the policing mechanism and provide more information related to manager to small shareholders and debt-holders.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
王明德、張登傑(19990900)。營建業組織中代理問題之分析。建築學報,30,27-42。
延伸查詢
2.
Chaganti, R.、Damanpour, F.(1991)。Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance。Strategic Management Journal,12(7),479-491。
3.
McConnell, John J.、Servaes, Henri(1990)。Additional Evidenceon Equity Ownership and Corporate Value。Journal of Financial Economics,27(2),595-612。
4.
Holderness, Clifford G.、Sheehan, Dennis P.(1988)。The Role of Majority Shareholders in Publicly-Held Corporations: An Exploratory Analysis。Journal of Financial Economics,20(1/2),317-346。
5.
Mezzetti, Claudio(1997)。Common Agency with Horizontally Differentiated Principals。Rand Journal of Economics,28(2),323-345。
6.
Olsen, T. E.、Torsvik, G.(1995)。Intertemporal common Agency and Organizational Design: How Much Decentralization。European Economic Review,39,1405-1428。
7.
Crutchley, C. E.、Hansen, R. S.(1989)。A test of the agency theory of managerial ownership, corporate leverage, and corporate dividends。Financial Management,18(4),36-46。
8.
Bernheim, B. D.、Whinston, M. D.(1986)。Common Agency。Econometrica,54(4),923-942。
9.
Stiglitz, Joseph E.(1985)。Credit markets and the control of capital。Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,17(2),133-152。
10.
Morck, Randall、Shleifer, Andrei、Vishny, Robert W.(1988)。Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis。Journal of Financial Economics,20(1/2),293-315。
11.
Stulz, René M.(1988)。Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control。Journal of Financial Economics,20(1/2),25-54。
12.
Fama, Eugene F.(1980)。Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm。Journal of Political Economy,88(2),288-307。
13.
Demsetz, Harold(1983)。The structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm。The Journal of Law & Economics,26(2),375-390。
14.
Shleifer, Andrei、Vishny, Robert W.(1997)。A survey of corporate governance。The Journal of Finance,52(2),737-783。
15.
Jensen, Michael C.、Meckling, William H.(1976)。Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure。Journal of Financial Economics,3(4),305-360。
16.
洪維廷(20010900)。共有代理結構與政策執行--以臺灣公共設施保留地之政策執行為例。中國行政,70,17-36。
延伸查詢
17.
Hill, C. W. L.、Shnell, S. A.(1989)。Effects on Ownership Structure and Control on Corporate Productivity。The Academy of Management Journal,32(1),25-46。
18.
Jahera, J. S., Jr.、Lloyd, W. P.、Goldstein, S. J.(1986)。The Relation between Returns, Ownership Structure, and Market Value。The Journal of Financial Research,9,171-177。
19.
Baumol, W. J.(1962)。On the Theory of Expansion of the Firm。The American Economic Review,52,1078-1087。
20.
Henricks, M.(1991)。The Power of Partnering。Small Business Reports,16(6),46-57。
21.
Laffont, J.、Martimort, D.(1997)。The Firm as a Multicontract organization。Journal of Economics and Management Strategy,6(2),201-234。
22.
Murali, R.、Welch, J. B.(1989)。Agents, Owners, Control and Performance。Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,24,385-398。
會議論文
1.
葉銀華、Lee, T. S.(1999)。Family Control, Board Composition and Corporate Performance: Corporate Governance in Taiwan。Taipei。
學位論文
1.
廖佳雯(1997)。營建業上市公司代理問題之初步探討,0。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
Cyert, R. M.、March, J. G.(1992)。A Behavioral Theory of the Firm。Blackwell Business。
2.
Dixit, Avinash K.(1996)。The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction-Cost Politics Perspective。MIT Press。
3.
Koutsoyiannis, A.(1979)。Modern Microeconomics。London, UK:New York, NY:Macmillan。
4.
Varian, Hal R.(1992)。Microeconomic Analysis。W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
建築資訊模型之法律議題初探
2.
組織公平與組織公民行為關係--以金融業、營建業實證比較
3.
起造人於公寓大廈管理維護作用之探討
4.
營建業組織中代理問題之分析
1.
不動產交易管制與資訊揭露之研究
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code