:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從正當程序原則的觀點檢視死刑存廢的正當性
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:吳景欽 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Jing Jin
出版日期:2004
卷期:31:5=360
頁次:頁35-60
主題關鍵詞:正當程序原則實體正當原則程序正當原則死刑無期徒刑Due process of lawSubstantive due processProcedural due processDeath penaltyLife penalty
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:36
     死刑的存廢一向具有爭議性,而我國隨著社會的進步,以及對於人權的重視,過去存在於特別刑法的死刑已逐步廢除,其中最讓人詬病的懲治盜匪條例,也於二○○二年完全廢除。但由於我國一般人民普遍仍反對廢除死刑的情況下,目前的刑法規範不僅仍存有死刑,甚且還存有唯一死刑的規定,這些可能有違憲之虞的規定,未來如何解決,將是我國人權保障至何程度的重要指標。而關於死刑存廢的探討,國內文獻不可謂不少,有從調查方式著手、有從法律觀點著手、有從社會觀點著手,杵文雖以法律層面為探討,但將重點擺在以憲法正當程序原則為基準的檢視,以有別於以往的論述。
     The abolition or retention of the death penalty is a controversial topic. In Taiwan the death penalty is a very important punishment and many people think that it can deter criminals. This article concentrates on the question of the due process of law and what influence this may have on its role as a deterrent. While what is discussed may be an abstract, academic principle, consideration of it should lead us to reformulate our view of the death penalty.
期刊論文
1.陳怡如(20030600)。從生命權的觀點論死刑制度違憲審查操作之問題--兼評釋字第一九四、二六三、四七六號解釋。軍法專刊,49(6),20-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.白取祐司(19991125)。刑事訴訟法。東京:日本評論社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Zimring, Franklin E.、Hawkins, Gordon、Kamin, Sam(2001)。Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You're Out in California。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.荻原滋(1991)。實體適正程序理論的研究。實體適正程序理論的研究。東京。  延伸查詢new window
4.小林孝輔(1997)。別冊法學─憲法。別冊法學─憲法。東京。  延伸查詢new window
5.Petersilia, Joan(1996)。Race, Crime and Justice。Race, Crime and Justice。Brookfield, Vermont。  new window
6.宮本倫好(1998)。死刑大國。死刑大國。東京。  延伸查詢new window
7.丁道源(1989)。中外獄政制度之比較研究。中外獄政制度之比較研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.Shichor, David、Sechrest, Dale K.(1996)。Three Strikes and You’re Out: Vengeance as Social Policy。Three Strikes and You’re Out: Vengeance as Social Policy。Thousand Oaks。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top