:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:不同結構慢跑鞋的避震能力研究
書刊名:國立體育學院論叢
作者:林信良廖維偉歐正明
作者(外文):Lin, Hsin-langLiao, Wei-weiO, Cheng-ming
出版日期:2004
卷期:14:2
頁次:頁203-212
主題關鍵詞:慢跑鞋避震最大負荷率Running shoesCushioningMLR
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:37
  • 點閱點閱:46
     慢跑鞋似乎成為休閒鞋市場主流,不管運動或不運動,腳上一雙慢跑鞋已經成為生活中必要的基本需求了,而慢跑鞋的避震功能,與下肢運動傷害的發生有關,因此十分值得注意。本實驗由一位29歲健康男性(身高172,體重67、下肢無重大運動傷害),利用節拍器控制最適步速,以右腳下階梯著地的方式比較不同結構慢跑鞋之避震能力,下階梯高度分別為10cm、20cm與30cm,測力板取樣頻率為1000Hz,測量各鞋款之最大地面反作用力與最大負荷率,每一高度取六次有效資料,統計方法採重複量數單因子變異數分析(One-Way ANOVA)進行體重與各參數的考驗。實驗結果如下: (1)、三種不同結構之慢跑鞋其最大地面反作用力測試結果未達顯著性差異(p>.05) (2)、三種不同結構之慢跑鞋其最大負荷率測試結果未達顯著性差異(p>.05)
     The running shoes become the mainstream in the market, whatever exercising or not, having the running shoes seems to be a basic necessary. And we must notice that the cushioning of the running shoes were related with the occurring of lower extremity injury. A healthy 29-years-old male participating this study (172 cm of height and 67 kg of weight) and a metronome was used to control the proper walking velocity. One force plate (sampling rate: 1000Hz) was used to gather maximum reaction force (MRF) and maximum loading rate (MLR). In the procedure, the subject wore the different structure of running shoes respectively and down stepped by the right feet (the height of step: 10cm, 20cm, 30cm). In each shoes and height, six complete data must be gathered. One-Way ANOVA analysis was used to complete the difference of all data. The results were as follow: 1.The MRF of the three pairs of running shoes of different structure weren't different significantly (p > .05). 2.The MLR of the three pairs of running shoes of different structure weren't different significantly (p > .05).
期刊論文
1.蔣至傑(20000900)。選購慢跑鞋之考量因素。中華體育季刊,14(2)=54,132-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Munro, C. F.、Miller, D. I.、Fuglevandet, A. J.(1987)。Ground reaction forces in running: reexamintion。J. Biomechanics,20(2),147-155。  new window
3.邱宏達、相子元、楊文賓(19980400)。運動鞋彈性及避震能力之探討。國立體育學院論叢,8(2),271-281。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.邱宏達、相子元、王金成(19960600)。運動方式與鞋墊厚度對避震效果之影響。體育學報,21,207-217。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王順正(19950300)。跑者下肢運動傷害原因的探討。國民體育季刊,24(1)=104,88-96。  延伸查詢new window
6.Alexadar, L. J.、Edmund, Y. S.、Chao, P. D.、Johnson, K. A.(1990)。Theassessment of dynamic foot to ground contact forces and plantar pressure distribution: a review of the evolution of current techniques and clinical applications。Foot and Ankle,11,152-167。  new window
7.莊訓達、朱峰進、李德仁(19991200)。專項運動鞋具之避震性測試的探討。大專體育,46,135-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.林寶城(19941200)。運動鞋結構功能之運動生物力學探討。中華體育季刊,8(3)=31,60-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Nigg, B. M.(1985)。Biomechanics, load analysis and sport injuries in the lower extremities。Sports Medicine,2(5),367-379。  new window
10.Andreasson, G.、Peterson, L.(1986)。Effect of Shoe and Surface Characteristics on Lower Limb Injuries in Sports。International Journal of Sport Biomechanics,2,202-209。  new window
11.Foti, T.、Hamill, J.(1993)。Shoe cushioning effects on vertical ground reaction force during running。Journal of Biomechanics,27(6),665。  new window
12.Cavanagh, P. R.、Lafortune, M. A.(1980)。Ground reaction forces in distance running。Journal of Biomechanics,13(5),397-406。  new window
13.邱宏達、楊明恩、相子元(19970900)。不同運動鞋的避震功能測試及測試間的變異性探討。體育學報,23,169-176。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.相子元(1997)。運動鞋與人體生物力學研究。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.賴金鑫(1985)。運動醫學講座。台北:健康世界雜誌社。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Snel, J. G.、Delleman, N. J.、Heerkens, Y. F.、Schenau, G. J.(1985)。Shock-absorbing characteristics of running shoes during actual running。Biomechanics。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top