臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：寬頻網路之開放接取與競爭政策
書刊名：公平交易季刊
作者：李治安 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lee, Jyh-an
出版日期：2004
卷期：12:3
頁次：頁25-62
主題關鍵詞：開放接取；競爭政策；有線數據機；數位用戶迴路；寬頻網路；網路服務提供者；美國聯邦通訊委員會；美國聯邦貿易委員會；科技創新；搭售；數位匯流；點對點架構；Open access；Competition policy；Cable modem；DSL；Broadband；ISP；FCC；FTC；Technology innovation；Tying；Digital convergence；End-to-end architecture
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:47
寬頻網路技術的發展，為消費者帶來更快速且多元的資訊傳輸服務，但提供寬頻傳輸的有線系統業者，卻開始透過策略聯盟、併購及排他性合約之交易方式，將其影響力擴展至網路服務提供者市場，並進而限制消費者選用不同網路服務提供者的自由，因而許多論者開始憂心，此種發展趨勢將使數位網路產業原本的市場競爭及技術創新機制遭到破壞，故政府應對有線系統業者課與開放接取之義務，但亦有持不同意見的論者認為，對於發展快速且市場結構尚未成熟之寬頻傳輸市場，政府不應貿然介入管制。 本文除介紹美國聯邦通訊委員會對前揭議題之政策立場外，並從市場競爭、政府管制及網路技術架構之角度，分析學者問之不同見解及該管制議題之複雜性，並兼論及我國寬頻產業管制政策上之發展及挑戰。最後本文以為，管制者除須維持市場之競爭機制及促進創新之網路架構外，尚應將不同面向之管制因素作出仔細評估，方能制定出符合網路產業長速發展及社會整體福祉之管制政策。
The broadband technology has facilitated users diversified and speedy information transmission. However, more and more cable companies begin to expand their market powers into ISPs market through mergers, acquisitions, strategic alliance, and exclusive agreement. Such business arrangements not only discriminate unaffiliated ISPs but also limit the possibilities for consumers to choose their own ISP companies. Proponents of the open access movement are worried that the vertical integration between cable companies and ISPs would impede competition and innovation while opponents are of the opinion that government shall adopt a hand-off policy toward the immature broadband market. This study first introduces the case-by-case policy position of FCC on the broadband open access issue. Besides, it analyses different opinions and debates from the viewpoint of market competition, regulatory policy, and the Internet architecture. Coming back to the regulatory scheme of Taiwan’s broadband network, it is also facing challenges from the convergence of cable TV and telecommunications services. The main difference of broadband market structure between Taiwan and United States is that the dominant player in Taiwan’s broadband market is the telecommunications giant Chungwha Telecom with unrivaled coverage of ADSL network while the main concern of the later is the market power posed by cable companies. This study concludes that for the sound development of the Internet and social welfare, not only shall the regulators maintain the mechanism of competition and innovation, they shall also take each related dynamic factors into serious consideration before they frame the regulatory scheme.
期刊論文
1.Lemley, Mark A.、Lessig, Lawrence(2001)。The End of End-to-End: Preserving the Architecture of the Internet in the Broadband Era。UCLA Law Review，48，925-972。  new window
2.Yoo, Christopher S.(2002)。Vertical Integration and Media Regulation in the New Economy。Yale Journal on Regulation，19(1)，171-297。  new window
3.Farrell, Joseph、Saloner, Garth(1986)。Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncements, and Predation。American Economic Review，76(5)，940-955。  new window
4.Krattenmaker, Thomas G.、Powe, L. A.(1995)。Converging First Amendment Principles for Converging Communications Media。Yale Law Journal，104(7)，1719-1741。  new window
5.江耀國(20020900)。論對寬頻多媒體(MOD)服務的法律管制。律師雜誌，276，34-43。  延伸查詢new window
6.李治安(2002)。網路時代中商業方法可專利性之政策分析。經社法制論叢，29。  延伸查詢new window
7.杜凱如(2002)。數位通路大戰，Action！。數位時代雙週刊，48。  延伸查詢new window
8.Dibadj, R.(2002)。Toward Meaningful Cable Competition: Getting Beyond the Monopoly Morass。New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy，6，245-320。  new window
9.Farrell, J.(1996)。Creating Local Competition。Federal Communications Law Journal，49，201-215。  new window
10.Hausman, J. A.、Sidak, J. G.(1999)。A Consumer-Welfare Approach to the Mandatory Unbundling of Telecommunications Networks。The Yale Law Journal，109，417-506。  new window
11.Hazlett, T. W.、Bittlingmayer, G.(2003)。The Political Economy of Cable Open Access。Stanford Technology Law Review，2003，4-42。  new window
12.Lee, William E.(2002)。Cable Modem Service and the First Amendment: Adventures in a 'Doctrinal Wasteland'。Harvard Journal of Law and Technology，16，125-158。  new window
13.Lopatka, J. E.、Page, W. H.(2001)。Internet Regulation and Consumer Welfare: Innovation, Speculation, and Cable Bundling。Hastings Law Journal，52，891-928。  new window
14.Rubinfeld, D. L.、Singer, H. J.(2001)。Vertical Foreclosure in High Technology Industries: A Case Study of the AOL Time Warner Merger。Berkeley Technology Law Journal，16，631-675。  new window
15.Shelanski, H. A.(1999)。The Speed Gap: Broadband Infrastructure and Electronic Commerce。Berkeley Technology Law Journal，14，721-744。  new window
16.Speta, J. B.(2000)。Handicapping the Race for the Last Mile?: A Critique of Open Access Rules for Broadband Platforms。Yale Journal on Regulation，17，39-91。  new window
17.Speta, J. B.(2000)。The Vertical Dimension of Cable Open Access。University of Colorado Law Review，71，975-1010。  new window
18.Spulber, D. F.、Yoo, C. S.(2003)。Access to Networks: Economic and Constitutional Connections。Cornell Law Review，88，885-1024。  new window
19.Weiser, P.(2000)。Competing Paradigms in Telecommunications Regulation。University of Colorado Law Review，71，819-847。  new window
會議論文
1.Kruse, H.。The InterNAT: Policy Implications of the Internet Architecture Debate。沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書
1.Schumpeter, J. A.(1976)。Capitalism, socialism, and democracy。New York：Harper and Brothers。  new window
2.Lessig, Lawrence(1999)。Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace。Basic Books。  new window
3.Shapiro, C.、Varian, H. R.(1999)。Information Rule: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy。Harvard Business School Press。  new window
4.Lessig, Lawrence(2001)。The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World。Random House, Inc.。  new window
5.Bresnahan, T. F.(1999)。New Modes of Competition: Implications for the Future Structure of the Computer Industry。Competition, Innovation and the Microsoft Monopoly: Antitrust in the Digital Marketplace。Boston, MA。  new window
6.Coase, R.(1990)。The Nature of the Firm。The Economic Nature of The Firm。Cambridge。  new window
7.Federal Communications Commission(1999)。Applications for Consent to the Transfer of Control of Licenses and Section 214 Authorizations from Tele-Communications, Inc., Transferor, to AT&T Corp., Transferee, 14 F. C. C. R. 3160 (Memorandum Opinion and Order)。Applications for Consent to the Transfer of Control of Licenses and Section 214 Authorizations from Tele-Communications, Inc., Transferor, to AT&T Corp., Transferee, 14 F. C. C. R. 3160 (Memorandum Opinion and Order)。Washington, DC。  new window
8.Federal Communications Commission(1999)。Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, FCC CC Docket No. 98-146, 14 F. C. C. R. 2398。Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, FCC CC Docket No. 98-146, 14 F. C. C. R. 2398。Washington, DC。  new window
9.Federal Communications Commission(2000)。Applications for Consent to the Transfer of Control of Licenses and Section 214 Authorizations from MediaOne Group, Inc., Transferor, to AT&T Corp., Transferee, 15 F. C. C. R. 9816 (Memorandum Opinion and Order)。Applications for Consent to the Transfer of Control of Licenses and Section 214 Authorizations from MediaOne Group, Inc., Transferor, to AT&T Corp., Transferee, 15 F. C. C. R. 9816 (Memorandum Opinion and Order)。Washington, DC。  new window
10.Federal Communications Commission(2000)。Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecomms. Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps to Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecomms. Act of 1996 (Second Report)。Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecomms. Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps to Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to Section 706 of the Telecomms. Act of 1996 (Second Report)。Washington, DC。  new window
11.Federal Communications Commission(2001)。Applications for Consent to the Transfer of Control of Licenses and Section 214 Authorizations by Time Warner Inc. and America Online, Inc., Transferors, to AOL Time Warner Inc., Transferee, FCC CS Docket No. 00-30, 16 F. C. C. R. 6547, (Memorandum Opinio。Applications for Consent to the Transfer of Control of Licenses and Section 214 Authorizations by Time Warner Inc. and America Online, Inc., Transferors, to AOL Time Warner Inc., Transferee, FCC CS Docket No. 00-30, 16 F. C. C. R. 6547, (Memorandum Opinio。Washington, DC。  new window
12.Federal Communications Commission(2002)。Inquiry Concerning High-Speed Access to the Internet Over Cable and Other Facilities, FCC GN Docket No. 00-185, FCC 02-77, (Declaratory Ruling and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking)。Inquiry Concerning High-Speed Access to the Internet Over Cable and Other Facilities, FCC GN Docket No. 00-185, FCC 02-77, (Declaratory Ruling and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking)。Washington, DC。  new window
13.Federal Trade Commission(2000)。In re Am. Online, Inc. & Time Warner Inc., No. C-3989, 2000 WL 1843019。In re Am. Online, Inc. & Time Warner Inc., No. C-3989, 2000 WL 1843019。Washington, DC。  new window
14.Laffont, J. J.、Tirole, J.(2000)。Competition in Telecommunication。Competition in Telecommunication。Cambridge。  new window
15.Posner, R. A.(2001)。Antitrust。Antitrust。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.中華電信工會(2003)。反對用戶迴路開放，沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.交通部電信總局(2003)。加速落實開放市內用戶迴路出租，電信總局促請固網業者密集商業協商，沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
3.Anonymous(2003)。AOL Dropped From Time Warner Name，沒有紀錄。  new window
4.Lathen, D. A.(1999)。Broadband Today，沒有紀錄。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1204（臺灣：1186，外國：18） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2196945 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68000649
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上