:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:電子資訊產業與非電子資訊產業之研究發展支出、股權結構與公司績效之關聯性研究
書刊名:臺北科技大學學報
作者:周淑卿吳欽杉陳安琳 引用關係
作者(外文):Chou, ShuchingWu, ChinshunChen, Anlin
出版日期:2004
卷期:37:2
頁次:頁267-287
主題關鍵詞:內部人持股比率研究發展支出公司績效內生關係Insider stockholdingsResearch expenditureFirm performance3SLS
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:96
  • 點閱點閱:156
電子資訊業之高績效、大量研究發展支出及以股票為主的獎酬制度等產業特色,使得研究發展支出、內部人持股比率及公司績效間可能有相互的影響(內生關係存在)。本文以三階段最小平方方法(3SLS),設立聯立方程式以比較內部人持股比率、研究發展支出及公司績效,在電子資訊業及非電子資訊業是否有不同的關聯性。 結果顯示電子資訊業在低內部人持股比率範圍時,內部人持股比率對公司績效有負向的影響,而內部人持股比率較高時,內部人持股比率對公司績效有正向的影響。此與非電子資訊業之結果相反。其可能原因為電子資訊業為了因應市場快速的變化,較集中的股權可能有利內部人之協商並於在短期內作重大的決議暨執行之。而在非電子資訊業,則發現內部人持股比率較低時,內部人持股比率對公司績效有正向的影響,符合利益收斂假說;而內部人持股比率較高時,內部人持股比率對公司績效有負向的影響,符合鞏固地位假說。此外我們發現一個有趣的現象,即基本上電子資訊業相對較非電子資訊業投入較多而穩定的研究發展費用以維持競爭力,但在非電子資訊業則公司績效愈高時,企業才會相對地提高研究發展支出。
The characteristics of high performance, high research expenditure and stock-based compensation plan of electric industry may relate insider stockholdings, research expenditure and firm performance as endogenous variables that are jointly determined. In this study, we apply three-stage least squares method (3SLS) to measure and compare the relevance of insider stockholdings, research expenditure and firm performance between electric and non-electric industries. Our results show that, in electric industry, within low insider stockholding range, increasing insider stockholdings has negative effect on firm performance; and within high insider stockholding range, higher stockholdings has positive effect on firm performance. The possible explanation is that higher insider ownership may help management to response to market quickly without spending lots of time in negotiation between insiders. While in non-electric industry, we find that within low insider stockholding range, insider stockholding has positive effect on firm performance, that agrees to convergence of interest hypothesis; but when insider hold over than average, firm performance will get worse, that agrees to entrenchment hypothesis. Furthermore, we find electric industry has higher and more stable research expenditure to maintain its competitive advantage than non-electric industry that spends more in research only when firm is doing well.
期刊論文
1.屠美亞、陳姿挺(20010900)。銀行借款、股權結構與公司監管機制。華信金融季刊,15,43-54。  延伸查詢new window
2.詹錦宏、楊麗弘(20011200)。臺灣上市公司股權結構與經營績效之研究--產業特性與股權質押之觀點。臺灣銀行季刊,52(4),202-221。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.金成隆、林修葳(19980000)。臺灣上市公司月盈餘揭露行為之實証研究。證券市場發展,10(3)=39,31-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Anderson, Mark C.、Banker, Rajiv D.、Ravindran, Sury(2000)。Executive Compensation in the information Technology Industry。Management Science,46(4),530-547。  new window
5.林宜勉(19990700)。盈餘資訊性與管理者股權之關聯性研究。企銀季刊,23(1),175-195。  延伸查詢new window
6.Cho, M. H.(1998)。Ownership Structure, Investment, and the Corporate Value: An Empirical Analysis。Journal of Financial Economics,47(1),103-121。  new window
7.Himmelberg, C. P.、Hubbard, R. G.、Palia, D.(1999)。Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and the Link between Ownership and Performance。Journal of Financial Economics,53,353-384。  new window
8.McConnell, J. J.、Muscarella, C. J.(1985)。Corporate Capital Expenditure Decisions and the Market Value of the Firm。Journal of Financial Economics,14(3),399-422。  new window
9.McConnell, John J.、Servaes, Henri(1990)。Additional Evidenceon Equity Ownership and Corporate Value。Journal of Financial Economics,27(2),595-612。  new window
10.Murphy, Kevin J.(2003)。Stock-based Pay in New Economy Firms。Journal of Accounting and Economics,34(1-3),129-147。  new window
11.陳安琳、李文智、林宗源(19990100)。新上市公司股票之發行折價--代理成本與公司控制之研究。中國財務學刊,6(3),1-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Leland, Hayne E.、Pyle, David H.、Brealey, Richard(1977)。Informational Asymmetries, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation。The Journal of Finance,32(2),371-387。  new window
13.Morck, Randall、Shleifer, Andrei、Vishny, Robert W.(1988)。Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis。Journal of Financial Economics,20(1/2),293-315。  new window
14.Claessens, Stijn、Djankov, Simeon、Lang, Larry H. P.(2000)。The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations。Journal of Financial Economics,58(1/2),81-112。  new window
15.Stulz, René M.(1990)。Managerial Discretion and Optimal Financing Policies。Journal of Financial Economics,26(1),3-27。  new window
16.Ittner, Christopher D.、Lambert, Richard A.、Larcker, David F.(2003)。The Structure and Performance Consequences of Equity Grants to Employees of New Economy Firms。Journal of Accounting and Economics,34(1-3),89-127。  new window
17.Demsetz, Harold、Villalonga, Belén(2001)。Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance。Journal of Corporate Finance,7(3),209-233。  new window
18.葉銀華、邱顯比(19960800)。資本結構、股權結構與公司價值關聯性之實證研究:代理成本理論。臺大管理論叢,7(2),57-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Jensen, Michael C.、Ruback, Richard S.(1983)。The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence。Journal of Financial Economics,11(1-4),5-50。  new window
20.Demsetz, Harold、Lehn, Kenneth(1985)。The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences。Journal of Political Economy,93(6),1155-1177。  new window
21.Jensen, Michael C.、Meckling, William H.(1976)。Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure。Journal of Financial Economics,3(4),305-360。  new window
學位論文
1.林重印(1997)。股權結構對委託書爭奪戰結果之影響(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
2.張明峰(1991)。股權結構對公司績效影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Schmidt, P.(1976)。Econometrics。New York:Marcel Dekker。  new window
2.Ross, S. A.、Westerfield, R. W.、Jaffe, J. F.(1993)。Corporate Finance。Homewood:Irwin。  new window
3.Greene, William H.(2003)。Econometric analysis。Prentice Education。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE