This study selected 26 sea-activity symbols (13 from Taiwan and 13 from Australian sea rescus Association) to examine their recognition rates and possible symbol confusion based on university students. The results indicated that the differences between male and female recognition rates across the 26 sea-activity symbols were limited, while the recognition rates for different symbols exhibited great differences (ranging from 32% to 97% for Taiwan, 44% to 98% for Australia). Only 4 out of 13 (Taiwan) and 8 out of 13 (Australia) symbols satisfied the minimum 67% recognition rate for public symbols suggested by International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Although some symbols satisfied 67% ISO standard, they might confuse with other symbols as well. This study suggested that designers should redesign those symbols unsatisfied with ISO standards or easily confused with other symbols. Additionally, those symbols with low recognition rate should be introduced to public through education.