臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：A Case Analysis of the DMCA Anti-Circumvention Provisions from Aspects of Fair Use and Competition
書刊名：政大智慧財產評論
作者：李憲珍
作者(外文)：Li, Hsien-chen
出版日期：2004
卷期：2:2
頁次：頁133-163
主題關鍵詞：數位千禧年著作權法；反規避條款；合理使用；技術保護措施；反托拉斯法；著作權濫用；Lexmark案；DVD區域碼；Technological protection measure；DRM；Digital rights management；DMCA；Anti-circumvention provisions；Fair use；Antitrust violations；Copyright misuse；DVD regional codes；Lexmark case
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:34
為了加強數位著作的著作權保護與履行WIPO著作權條約會員國義務，美國國會於1998年通過數位千禧年著作權法案（the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, DMCA）。數位千禧年著作權法中一項重要規定為反規避條款，透過反規避條款之實施，任何人未經著作權人同意，以規避技術保護措施之方式接觸或利用受保護之著作內容，將產生刑事與民事責任，而提供或販賣規避工具也在禁止行為之列。雖然DMCA反規避條款提供七項例外免責之規定，由於這些例外規定涵蓋範圍遠較著作權法與判決所承認的合理使用型態來得狹窄，是否著作使用者可以依據合理使用著作之原則來正當化其規避技術保護措施之行為，成為一項學者與法院之間爭論之議題，而這也涉及到DMCA與傳統著作權法之間的定位與競合關係。除此之外，最近美國法院的兩個判決點出了反規避條款所衍生的另一個問題---對市場競爭秩序之影響。在Lexmark案中，Lexmark在控制印表機的電腦程式上加裝技術保護措施，進一步利用反規避條款之保護，阻止競爭者研發與Lexmark印表機相容之墨水匣，藉以控制其墨水匣市場，因此引發了著作權濫用與不公平競爭的相關討論。競爭法相關議題還包括DVD分區鎖碼之問題。本文希望藉由對美國反規避條款施行近六年所產生的問題之觀察，能提供我國新修正著作權法納入反規避條款在適用上所可能產生對合理使用與競爭秩序影響之再思考。
In order to strengthen copyright protection against piracy in the digital environment, U.S. Congress enacted the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) in 1998. One of the important regulations included in the DMCA is the anti-circumvention provisions which prohibits the development or use of technologies that enable circumvention of a technological protection measure attached to the digital content. Any person who violates the anti-circumvention provisions by cracking technological protection measure or by providing circumvention tools will be prosecuted unless his act of circumvention falls into seven exemptions provided by the DMCA. Because these exemptions are so limited and only cover a small part of legitimate copyright uses, whether a person can circumvent a technological protection measure to access and use copyrighted materials behind based on fair use claims becomes an issue when we try to clarify the connection between anti-circumvention regulations and traditional copyright laws. Additionally, two recent DMCA cases illustrated another intrinsically unexpected effect of the anti-circumvention provisions where the non-copyrightable product providers may use the DMCA to prevent competitors from developing compatible accessories by claiming copyrights on the computer programs embedded in the products and by claiming their anti-circumvention rights on the technological protection measure attached to the computer programs. This kind of application of the DMCA may raise concerns of DMCA misuse and unfair competition.
期刊論文
1.Burk, Dan L.、Cohen, Julie E.(2001)。Fair Use Infrastructure for Rights Management Systems。Harvard Journal of Law & Technology，15，41。  new window
2.Burk, Dan L.(2002)。Anticircumvention Misuse。University of California at Los Angeles Law Review，50，1095-1140。  new window
3.Benkler, Yochai(1999)。Free as the air to common use: First Amendment constraints on enclosure of the public domain。New York University Law Review，74(2)，354-446。  new window
4.Samuelson, Pamela(1999)。Intellectual Property and the Digital Economy: Why the Anti-Circumvention Regulations Need to Be Revised。Berkeley Technology Law Journal，14(2)，519-566。  new window
5.Brown, Kristin(2003)。Digital Rights Management: Trafficking in Technology That Can Be Used to Circumvent the Intellectual Property Clause。Houston Law Review，40，803。  new window
6.Bell, Tom W.(1998)。Fair Use vs. Fared Use: The Impact of Automated Rights Management on Copyright's Fair Use Doctrine。North Carolina Law Review，76(2)，557。  new window
7.Gordon, Wendy J.(1982)。Fair Use as Market Failure: A Structure and Economic Analysis of the Betamax Case and its Predecessors。Columbia Law Review，82(8)，1600-1657。  new window
8.Reese, Anthony(2003)。Legal Incentives for Adopting Digital Rights Management Systems: Merging Access Controls and Rights controls。Berkeley Technology Law Journal，18，619。  new window
9.Ginsburg, Jane(1997)。Authors and Users in Copyright。Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A.，45(1)，1-20。  new window
10.Hovenkamp, H.(1993)。Market Power in Aftermarkets: Antitrust Policy and the Kodak Case。UCLA Law Review，40，1447。  new window
11.Samuelson, Pamela、Scotchmer, Suzanne(2002)。The Law and Economics of Reverse Engineering。Yale Law Journal，111(7)，1575-1663。  new window
12.Nimmer, David(20000100)。A Riff on Fair Use in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act。University of Pennsylvania Law Review，148(3)，673-742。  new window
13.Meurer, Michael J.(2001)。Copyright Law and Price Discrimination。Cardozo Law Review，23，55+67-75。  new window
14.Weinberg, Jonathan(2000)。Hardware-Based ID, Rights Management, and Trusted Systems。Stanford Law Review，52，1251-1281。  new window
圖書
1.Posner, Richard A.(2001)。Antitrust Law。University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.Areeda, Phillip、Hovenkamp, Herbert。Antitrust Law。  new window
3.Goldstein, Paul(1994)。Copyright's Highway: From Gutenberg to the Celestial Jukebox。  new window
其他
1.Bechtold, Stefan(2003)。The present and future of digital rights management-musings on emerging legal problems，http://www.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/bechtold/pub/2003/Future_DRM.pdf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1437（臺灣：1419，外國：18） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2488187 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68300560
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上