:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:謝勒所體認的科、技之知
書刊名:輔仁宗教研究
作者:關永中
作者(外文):Kwan, Wing Chung
出版日期:2004
卷期:10
頁次:頁123-166
主題關鍵詞:科學技術實驗歸納儉省規則ScienceTechnologyExperimentationInductionCanon of parsimony
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:26
本論文是為前期《輔仁宗教研究》第九期拙作<謝勒所體認的宗教之知>一文之姊妹篇。筆皷在前篇論文中曾分析謝勒所反思的宗教義及宗教與科學問之張力,此篇則集中在謝勒對科學與技術之知的體認。筆皷在交代了科學義的初步界定後,隨即探討謝勒現象學剖析下之科學義蘊,并按照謝勒所獲得的洞察而企圖替科學定義為:科學以「宰制心態」為「體」、以「實證方法」為「用」、以「科學技術」為「果」、以「自我修正」為「效」。謝勒尤站在社會向 度強調:科學的發展要比其他學問更有賴於社會眾因素的和合得宜。在與宗教的邂逅方面,謝勒體會到宗教首牨出現於中下窮苦階級,而科學的發展須有賴中下階層所提供之工作經驗,藉此與中上階級之思想定所提供的理論架構配合,才得以綻放科技的花果。此外,謝勒在反思近代科學發達的機緣上,還意識到西方宗教團體曾因宗教改革等因素的影響而讓科、技有發揮的契機。最後,謝勒還因應當代科技發達所引致的物質文明高漲與心靈文明空虛,而建議西方人仕取法東方宗教那份重靈修與包容的精神,即藉著東西文明的對談而企圖化解世界因科技發達所招致的文化危機。
This is an essay complementary to a former article published by Fu Jen Religious Studies No. 9 entitled “The Knowledge of Religion as Appropriated by Max Scheler”. In the previous article, we have dealt with Scheler’s investigation of the phenomenon of religion as well as its tension with science. Here, we move forward to pay attention to Scheler’s research into the meaning of science and technology. With the insights attained by Scheler, we manage to put forward the following such a definition: Science takes the control of nature as its essence, employing experimental induction as its means, lead to the development of technology as its result ever exemplifies itself with self-revision as its effective characteristic. Schelear makes an emphasizes that the development of science requires the ideal co-operation of all social factors, including the religious factor of one’s culture. Using Western civilization as an example, Scheler stresses the fact that science has benefited itself through the religious reformation in the lower-working class, manages to provide working experience which many match the theoretical speculation of the upper class so as to lead to a positive result on scientific research. Scheler also warns us of the crisis for human society on account of the excessive manipulation of nature due to scientific development. And he recommends that Westerners should listen to the wisdom of Eastern Civilization which is comparatively more spiritual and contemplative in orientation.
圖書
1.Scheler, Max(1996)。Tod, Fortleben und Gottesidee。Tod, Fortleben und Gottesidee。香港。  new window
2.Scheler, Max(1962)。Man's Place in Nature。Man's Place in Nature。New York。  new window
3.Lonergan, Bernard(1980)。Understanding and Being: An introduction and Companion to Insight。Understanding and Being: An introduction and Companion to Insight。New York & Toronto。  new window
4.Scheler, Max(1995)。資本主義的未來。資本主義的未來。香港。  延伸查詢new window
5.Scheler, Max、Frings, Manfred S.、Stikkers, Kenneth W.(1980)。Problems of a Sociology of Knowledge。London:Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
6.Lonergan, Bernard(1957)。Insight。New York。  new window
7.Scheler, Max(1973)。Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values。Evanston。  new window
8.Scheler, Max(1958)。Philosopher's Outlook。Philosophical perspectives。Boston。  new window
圖書論文
1.Scheler, Max(1973)。Ordo Amoris。Selected Philosophical Essays。Evanston, IL:Northwestern University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top