:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:類神經網路在競標理論之應用--以美國政府政府公債市場為例
書刊名:明志學報
作者:陳世民 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Shy-min
出版日期:2005
卷期:36:2
頁次:頁9-22
主題關鍵詞:競標理論類神經網路共同價值模型美國公債標售市場Auction theoryArtificial neural networkCommon value modelAmerican bond bidding market
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:0
本研究利用類神經網路以美國公債標售市場來進行實證之研究,並與迴歸模型作一比較,以了解類神經網路在競標理論之共同價值模型的適用性。在建立類神經網路及迴歸之預測模型的過程,由平均得標殖利率切入,獲得下列數點結論:1.經實證結果發現,類神經網路模型在實證結果及測試能力上之表現均較迴歸模型來的好,但由於類神經網路模型對相關變數並無解釋能力,若牽涉到需理論之推導及解釋時,則需借助迴歸模型。2.綜合類神經網路模型及迴歸模型之測試及預測結果發現,由於測試資料包含於學習過程之中,因此在測試所得之結果均優於預測所得之結果。在資料的測試方面,以類神經網路模型表現較好。在資料的預測方面,卻是以迴歸模型表現較好。若再加上以發行期限為區分,類神經網路模型在資料測試上的表現,以五年期及十年期的表現較好,而迴歸模型在兩年期的表現較好。在資料預測方面,類神經網路模型的預測結果以兩年期的表現較好,而迴歸模型在十年期的表現較好。
This research applies articial neural network (ANN) to study the common value model of auction theory in American bonds market. The performance of the proposed model is compared to the conventional regression model by using the bond bidding data in 1998 for recall and data in 1999 for prediction. Our comparison indicates that the ANN model is better than the regression model in the recall (test) process; however ANN model does not have the ability to describe the relationship between the input and output. The result also shows that the regression performance better in predication process if the factor of Security Description is not considered. Further consideration of Security Description indicates that ANN has better prediction performance in the long term bond (5-year and 10-year) than the regression model. However, the short term both the regression model does better.
期刊論文
1.Klemperer, P.(1998)。Auctions with Almost Common Values: The 'Wallet Game' and Its Application。European Economic Review,42(3-5),757-769。  new window
2.McAfee, R. P.、McMillan, J.(1987)。Auctions and Bidding。Journal of Economic Literature,25(2),699-738。  new window
3.Laffont, Jean-Jacques(1997)。Game theory and empirical economics: The case of auction data。European Economic Review,41,1-35。  new window
4.Vapnik, V. N.、Chervonnenkis, A. Y.(1971)。On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies of events to their probabilities。Theory of Probability and its Applications,16(2),264-280。  new window
5.Hush, D. R.、Horne, B. G.(1993)。Progress in supervised neural networks。IEEE Signal Processing Magazine,10(1),8-39。  new window
6.Lu, Long-Chuan、Chen, Wen-Hui、Kim, Daeryong、Hwang, Chen-Pei(1996)。Artificial Neural Systems Improve Franchising Decision Making。International Journal of Management,13(1),25-32。  new window
7.陳曉玫(19940900)。美國公債市場之發展與演變。國際金融參考資料,35,71-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.毛德文(19941000)。美國公債標售制度探討。今日合庫,20(10)=238,54-65。  延伸查詢new window
9.沈維民、李重君(19960100)。拍賣制度之簡介。審計季刊,16(2),80-94。  延伸查詢new window
10.張子雲(19960800)。OECD各國公債發行制度之簡介--與我國制度之比較。證券櫃檯,2,11-18。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳聖心(19990400)。美國聯邦準備體系與政府公債簡介。中信通訊,214,17-23。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳曉玫(19931100)。淺談美國公債標售制度。貨幣金融月刊,12(6),6-8。  延伸查詢new window
13.游金鳳(19950300)。美國無實體公債管理制度。中央銀行季刊,17(1),44-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Capen, E. C.、Clapp, R. V.、Campbell, W. M.(1971)。Competitive Bidding in High-risk Situation。Journal of Petroleum Technology,23,641-653。  new window
15.Feldman, Robert A.、Mehra, Rajnish(1993)。Auctions: Theory and Application。International Monetary Fund,40(3),156-159。  new window
16.Gordy, Michael B.(1998)。Computationally Convenient Distributional Assumptions for Common-Value Auctions。Computational Economics,12,61-78。  new window
17.Hush, D. R.、Salas, J. M.、Home, B. G.(1992)。Error Surfaces for Multi-layer Perceptions。IEEE Transactions on systems, Man and Cybernetics,22(5),8-39。  new window
18.Kagel, John H.、Levin, Dan、Battalio, Raymond C.、Meyer, Donald J.(1989)。First-price Common Value Auctions: Bidder Behavior and the Winner's Course。Economic Inquiry,27,241-258。  new window
19.Levin, Dan、Kagel, John、Richard, Jean-Francois(1996)。Revenue Effects and Information Processing in English Common Value Auction。The American Economic Review,86(3),442-460。  new window
20.Mead, Walter(1967)。Natural Resource Disposition Policy: Oral Auctions vs Sealed Bids。Natural Resource Journal,194-224。  new window
21.Simon, D.(1994)。Markups, Quantity Risk and Bidding Strategies at Treasury Coupon Auctions。Journal of Financial Economics,35,43-62。  new window
22.Umiauf, S.(1993)。An Empirical Study of the Mexican Treasury Bill Auction。Journal of Financial Economics,33,313-340。  new window
23.Swanson, N. R.、White, H.(1995)。A Model-Selection Approach to Assessing the Information in the Term Structure Using Linear Models and Artificial Neural Networks。Journal of Business & Economic Statistics,13,265-275。  new window
24.Hansen, R. G.(1985)。Empirical Testing of Auction Theory。The American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings,75(2),156-159。  new window
25.Kagel, J. H.、Levin, D.(1986)。The Winner's Curse and Public Information in Common Value Auction。American Economic Review,76,894-920。  new window
會議論文
1.Kimoto, T.、Asakawa, K.(1990)。Stock Market Prediction System with Modular Network。IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks,(會議日期: 1990/01/15-01/19),1-6。  new window
學位論文
1.謝昭熠(1992)。拍賣制度之研究(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.蘇仁(1994)。可轉換公司債評價模式與類神經網路--臺灣地區的實証研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.王姿尹(1996)。新台幣與美元相對匯率預測模型:類神經網路分析的應用(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.林志鴻(1995)。類神經網路支援股市投資決策(碩士論文)。台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.紀如龍(1996)。BPN暨RN神經網路與向量誤差修正模型對國內債券價格之預測績效(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.許鈴佩(1997)。台灣公債標售與贏家詛咒之實證研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.傅勻余(1998)。我國中央公債制度之研究(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃共揚(1996)。公債標售對市場訊息內涵之探討(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃志晟(1997)。中央政府公債標售價格預測模式之研究(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.周政宏(1995)。神經網路--理論與實務。台北:松崗電腦圖書資料股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.葉怡成(1993)。類神經網路模式應用與實作。臺北:儒林圖書有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Wasserman, P. D.(1988)。Neural Computing: Theory and Practice。Van Nostrand Reinhold Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Baker, C.(1976)。Auctioning Coupon-bearing Securities: A Review of Treasury Experience。Bidding and Auctioning for Procurement and Allocation。New York University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE