五年前修憲把常設的國民大會改為任務型，但配套的制度並沒有適時完備，以致去年立法院通過修憲提案後，才匆忙制訂相關法律，其內容設計有多處偏離任務型國大的憲法意旨，最後雖然還是完成了修憲，任務型國大的制度也隨之走入歷史，但整個過程顯現我國主要政治行動者憲法意識的薄弱，深值大家警惕。本文特別回顧此一過程，提出檢討意見。

The so-called mission-bound National Assembly was devised five years ago by way of a constitutional amendment, but the contingent legal framework for implementing the new constitutional institution was never put in place until the Legislative Yuan adopted a package deal to amend the constitution in August 2004. Laws on the organization, the election as well as the procedure of the new National Assembly were hastily passed, but were full of flaws and in conflict with the spirit of the constitution. Nonetheless, the amendments were successfully completed and the Ad Hoc National Assembly went down in history. The entire process presents a valuable lesson which warrants a careful review.