本文主要有個兩部分：首先是批判性的部分，在此部分我將批判地指出，化約主義的研究計畫在面對解釋觀點與語言遊戲的二元論困境時，僅能規避付出伴隨現象學的代價。其次是建構性的部分，我將回溯「透視二元論」的人類學根源，而此「透視二元論」本身並沒有排斥一元化觀點的自然進化論。關於「決定精神狀況的大腦」與「程式化大腦的精神」之間的複雜的互動圖像，是一種哲學反省的成果，而不是自然科學知識本身的成果。我代表著一種非科學的或是一種「柔性」的自然主義的觀點並且企圖在康德與達爾文之間獲得一種兼容的意見。

This article mainly has two parts: First is the critique part, I will criticize in this part and it will be pointed out that when the reductional research plan will face the dualism's difficult situation of the explanation viewpoint and the language game, it tries only to avoid to pay the price of epiphenomenon. Next constructs the construction part, I will recall the anthropological root of ”the perspective dualism”, because this ”the perspective dualism” itself has not certainly repelled the unified viewpoint of the natural theory of evolution. About the complex interactive image between ”cerebrum” and ”spirit” is one philosophical reflexive achievement, but is not the natural sciences knowledge itself achievement. I represent one kind of non-science or ”soft” naturalism viewpoint and try obtaining the compatible opinion between Kant and Darwin.