魁北克獨立問題之諮詢意見__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	魁北克獨立問題之諮詢意見
書刊名：	問題與研究
作者：	陳盛
作者(外文)：	Chen, Sheng
出版日期：	2005
卷期：	44:5
頁次：	頁53-84
主題關鍵詞：	魁北克；諮詢意見；片面脫離；自決權；憲政基本原則；憲政協商；Quebec；Reference；Unilateral secession；Self-determination；Fundamental principles of the constitution；Negotiations underlying constitutional principles
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:0 點閱:35

加拿大魁北克省分別於1980年與1995年舉行獨立公投，魁獨勢力雖然暫時挫敗，但是獨立聲浪仍方興未艾。加拿大總督依據最高法院法第五十三條，就魁北克脫離聯邦有關之三項疑義，向最高法院提請求裁定諮詢意見：（1）依據憲法，魁北克是否有片面脫離聯邦之權？（2）依據國際法，魁北克是否有片面脫離加拿大之權？（3）上開二項權利是否衝突？加拿大憲法雖無相關規定，但最高法院依據憲政基本原則，認為無論依據國內法或國際法，魁北克省均無片面脫離加拿大聯邦權利。最高法院指出，依據加拿大四項憲政基本原則：（1）聯邦制度、（2）民主制度、（3）憲政法治、（4）保護少數，魁北克人民之明確多數就明確問題，循民主程序所表達之脫離聯邦意願，聯邦政府與其他各省應予尊重，在魁北克公民複決之後，四項憲政基本原則賦予所有聯邦成員「協商」憲法增修之義務。憲法增修顯屬政治決策，不屬司法裁判範圍，最高法院僅就協商所依附之法律結構表示意見。

以文找文

Quebec held a referendum for secession in 1980 and 1995 respectively. Both time, it turned out in disfavor of sovereign Quebecers. In 1996 Governor in Council, in pursuant to section 53 of the Supreme Court Act, referred to the Supreme Court of Canda for advisory opinion on three questions concerning the secession of Quebec from Canada: (1) Under the Constitution of Canada, can the Natoinal Assembly, legislature or government of Quebec effect the secession of Quebec from Canada unilaterally? (2) Does International law give the National Assembly, legislature or government of Quebec the right to effect the secession of Quebec from Canada unilaterally? (3) In the event of a conflict between domestic and international law on the right of the National Assembly, legislature or government of Quebec to effect the secession of Quebec from Canada unilaterally, which one takes precedent? Based on the four fundamental principles of the Constitution, including the principles of federalism, democracy, constitutionalism and the rule of law, and respect for minorities, the Supreme Court of Canada held that the clear repudiation of the existing constitutional order and the clear expression of the desire to pursue secession by the population of a province would give rise to a reciprocal obligation on all parties to the Confederation to negotiate constitutional changes to respond to that desire. The reconciliation of the various legitimate constitutional interests is necessarily confined to the political rather than the judicial realm, precisely because the reconciliation can only be achieved through the give and take to the negotiating process. Having established the legal framework, it would be for the democratically elected leadership of the various participants to resolve their difference.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Morici, Peter(1997)。A Sovereign Quebec and U.S. National Interests。The American Review of Canadian Studies，4，249-249。
2.	Shek, B. Z.(1989)。Book Review。University of Toronto Quarterly，59(1)，142-142。
3.	Turp, D.(1995)。The June 12 Agreement: A Common Project for Québec's Future。Canada Watch，3(7)，1-3。
4.	MacLauchlan, H. Wade(1997)。Accounting for Democracy and the Rule of Law in the Quebec Secession Reference。Canadian Bar Review，76，146-146。

圖書
1.	Jenning, Robert Yewdall(1963)。The Acquisition of Territory in International Law。Manchester：Manchester University Press。
2.	Cassese, Antonio(1995)。Self-Determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal。Cambridge University Press。
3.	Couture, Claude(1998)。Paddling with the Current: Pierre Elliott Trudeau, Étienne Parent, Liberalism, and Nationalism in Canada。Paddling with the Current: Pierre Elliott Trudeau, Étienne Parent, Liberalism, and Nationalism in Canada。Alberta, Canada。
4.	Gallay, Alan(1996)。Colonial Wars of North America, 1512-1763: An Encyclopedia。Colonial Wars of North America, 1512-1763: An Encyclopedia。New York, NY。
5.	Creery, T.(1966)。What French Canada Wants。Politics: Canada。Toronto, Canada。
6.	Bélanger, Claude(2000)。Reading in Quebec History。Reading in Quebec History。Montreal, Canada。
7.	Shields, Charles J.(2001)。John Cabot and the Rediscovery of North America。John Cabot and the Rediscovery of North America。New York, NY。
8.	Ouellet, Fernand(1980)。Economic and Social History of Quebec 1760-1850: Structures and Conjunctures。Economic and Social History of Quebec 1760-1850: Structures and Conjunctures。Toronto, Canada。
9.	Gilchrist, M. M.(2003)。Patrick Ferguson: A Man of Some Genius。Patrick Ferguson: A Man of Some Genius。Edinburgh, UK。
10.	Lanctot, Gustave(1974)。From the Treaty of Utrecht to the Treaty of Paris 1713-1763。From the Treaty of Utrecht to the Treaty of Paris 1713-1763。Cambridge, MA。
11.	LeDuc, Lawrence、Jenson, Jane、Clarke, Harold D.、Pammett, Jon H.(1983)。Political Support and Voting Behavior in the Quebec Referendum。Political Support in Canada: The Crisis Years。Durham, NC。
12.	Coulter, Tony(1992)。Jacques Cartier, Samuel de Champlain, and the explorers of Canada。Jacques Cartier, Samuel de Champlain, and the explorers of Canada。New York, NY。
13.	Lambton, John George(1912)。Report of Lord Durham on the Affairs of British North America [1839]。Lord Durham's Report on the Affairs of British North America。London, UK。
14.	Hogg, Peter W.(1997)。Constitutional Law of Canada。Constitutional Law of Canada。Scarborough, Canada。
15.	Noll, Mark A.(1992)。A History of Christianity in the Uninted States and Canada。A History of Christianity in the Uninted States and Canada。Grand Rapids, MI。

圖書論文
1.	Doehring, Karl(2002)。Self-determination。The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary。Oxford, UK：Oxford University Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	國際視野下的香港立法會普選之道

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫