:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:美國對格魯吉亞的外交政策
書刊名:問題與研究
作者:龍舒甲
作者(外文):Lung, Shu-chia
出版日期:2005
卷期:44:5
頁次:頁85-101
主題關鍵詞:美國布希俄羅斯格魯吉亞謝瓦納澤薩阿卡什維利裏海南高加索石油管線九一一事件北約United StatesGeorge W. BushRussian FederationGeorgiaEduard ShevardnadzeMikheil SaakashiviliCaspian SeaSouth CaucasusOil pipelineEvent of 9/11NATO
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:46
自2001年9月至2002年6月,布希曾發表9次有關國家安全方面的言論,匯集之後定名為「美國國家安全戰略」,並於2002年9月中旬公諸於世;其中不但包括強化能源地區之安全,也表明了對於弱國的腐敗政權將予以干預;格魯吉亞正好符合這兩點條件,也就是說,格國的不民主政權對於裏海石油管線之安全已構成了威脅。本文之目的,即在於以格魯吉亞作為研究案例,一方面要證明華府對格國的外交政策,主要是為滿足美國爭取最多能源的國家利益;另一方面則試圖透視布希政府,以道德感與價值觀配合著石油利益優先的原則,執行對格國外交的策略與演變。因此,本文首先擬探究華府對格國謝瓦納澤政權產生疑慮的四點原因,其次是分析美國對格魯吉亞的三項政策,最後則論述美國對薩阿卡什維利新政權的三項措施。
President George Bush delivered nine speeches on national security in public between September 2001 and June 2002. They have been complied and named as the National Security Strategy of the United States of America and published openly online in September 2002. It stressed not only to strengthen the security of energy regions, but also provide for the interevening of the corruptive regimes in those weak states. The Republic of Georgia fit the description on both list; namely, the Georgia's non-democratic regime has already threatened the security of the Capian pipeline. The purpose of this article, while regarding Georgia as a case study, tries to prove that the U.S. foreign policy towards Georgia is mainly based on satisfying her national interests. These interests include acquiring abundant energy and trying to implement diplomatic plans mixing morality and values with the principle of oil interest as a priority. In addition, we aim to observe the evolution of these plans in U.S. policy towards Georgia. In short, this article attempts to explore the four reasons why Washington suspected the democratic credentials of President Eduard Shevardnadze. It also tries to analyze three U.S. policy choices towards Georgia. Finally the article discusses three measusres adopted by Washington in dealing with Mikheil Saakashvili's government.
期刊論文
1.Giorgadze, Khatuna(2002)。Russia: Regional Partner or Aggressor?。The Review of International Affairs,2(1),69。  new window
2.Higley, John、Kullberg, Judith、Pakulski, Jan(1996)。The Persistence of Postcommunist Elites。Journal of Democracy,7(2),133-147。  new window
3.Hill, Fiona(2004)。Pipelines in the Caspian: Catalyst or Cure-all?。Georgetown Journal of International Affairs,5(1),18-19。  new window
4.Klare, Michael T.(2002)。The Deadly Nexus: Oil, Terrorism, and America’s National Security。Current History,101(659),414。  new window
5.Wallander, Celeste A.(2003)。US-Russian Relations: Between Realism and Reality。Current History,102(666),307-312。  new window
6.Rasizade, Alec(2002)。The Mythology of Munificent Caspian Bonanza and its Concomitant Pipeline Geopolitics。Central Asian Survey,21(1),37-54。  new window
7.Kryshtanovskaya, Olga、White, Stephen(1996)。From Soviet Nomenklatura to Russian Elite。Europe-Asia Studies,48(5),711-733。  new window
圖書
1.Haass, Richard N.(1999)。Intervention: The Use of American Military Forces in The Post-Cold War。Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press。  new window
2.Brown, Michael E.、Coté, Owen R., Jr.、Lynn-Jones, Sean M.、Miller, Steven E.(2001)。Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict。Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press。  new window
3.Sharansky, Natan、Dermer, Ron(2004)。The Case for Democracy: The Power of Freedom To Overcome Tyranny and Terror。New York, N.Y.:Public Affairs。  new window
其他
1.Kristol, William(2002)。Taking the War Beyond Terrorism。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top