:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:影響會計資訊品質因素之研究--以國立大專校院會計資訊系統使用者為例
書刊名:華人前瞻研究
作者:黃士銘 引用關係李超雄 引用關係劉永彬
作者(外文):Huang, Shi-mingLee, Chao-hsiungLiu, Yung-pin
出版日期:2005
卷期:1:2
頁次:頁65-101
主題關鍵詞:會計資訊系統會計資訊品質單因子獨立樣本變異數分析典型相關分析Accounting information systemAccounting information qualityOne-way ANOVACanonical analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:19
本研究蒐集影響會計資訊品質(正確性、時效性、完整性、一致性和有用性)之人員、組織、系統及外部議題等四大構面之相關文獻,並參酌當前我國大專校院會計資訊系統使用實況,提出問項並尋求產官學專家意見後,以問卷調查法對大專校院會計資訊系統使用者,對資訊品質管理認知做研究。並嚴謹地檢驗了影響會計資訊品質因素的信度、內容效度、建構效度。再以單因子獨立樣本變異數分析、積差相關、迴歸分析及典型相關探討人員、系統、組織及外部構面與會計資訊品質的關係。 實證分析結果顯示,不同組織規模之會計資訊系統使用者,對資訊品質管理認知無差異,系統的穩定性與系統檢核無法確保會計資訊品質,人員異動較少、主管重視、人員互動良好及主管機關加強督導可提升會計資訊品質。
In this research, the author tried to investigate the quality of accounting information, such as accuracy, timeliness, completeness, consistency and usefulness, affected by the four phases of personnel, organization, system and external issues. Examining this issue, the author designed the survey based on the opinions of professionals from governments, industries, scholarships. The author testified the validity of the survey by validity analysis and examined the correlations between quality of accounting information and the phases of personnel, organization, system, and external issues. It is indicated that (1) users has no difference about the cognition of accounting information quality despite the scale of organization; (2) the quality of accounting information could not be ensured by the factors of system stability and automatic auditing; (3) the quality of accounting information could be improved by the factors of low personnel rotation, high concerns of top-management, personnel interaction and high monitoring from supervision.
期刊論文
1.Badri, M. A.、Davis, D.、Davis, D.(1995)。A study of measuring the critical factors of quality management。International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management,12(2),36-53。  new window
2.Ballou, D. P.、Pazer, H. L.(1982)。The impact of inspector fallibility on theinspection policy serial production system。Management Science,28(4),387-399。  new window
3.Beaulieu, P. R.(1996)。A note on the role of memory in commercial loan officers' use of accounting and character information。Accounting, Organizations and Society,21(6),515。  new window
4.江淑玲(2004)。政府會計資訊運用於評做施政績效責任之探討。主計月刊,581,72-76。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳文弘、張育珍、李佩華(2003)。政僚附屬單位預算制度。主計月刊,574,39-46。  延伸查詢new window
6.呂秋香(2004)。中央政僚特種預算基金制度之回顧與展望。主計月刊,580,30-38。  延伸查詢new window
7.(2003)。超然主計制度在變革年代之新思維。主計月刊,580,4-5。  延伸查詢new window
8.李秀金(2003)。我國與美國公立大學內部稽核制度之比較評析。主計月刊,572,30-39。  延伸查詢new window
9.馬嘉應(2004)。剖析政僚會計報告透明度問題。主計月刊,581,63-66。  延伸查詢new window
10.馬嘉應(2004)。政僚會計觀念公報第三號「政府會計資訊之表達與揭露」之架構及制定歷程。主計月刊,581,67-71。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳慶財(2003)。政府內部稽核制度之探討。主計月刊,575,43-50。  延伸查詢new window
12.黃永傳(2003)。會計人員在內部控制體系之角色。主計月刊,575,31-42。  延伸查詢new window
13.賴森本(2004)。從先進國家趨勢談我國政府會計資訊揭露之改進方向。主計月刊,581,77-86。  延伸查詢new window
14.Stratton, W. O.(1981)。Accounting systems: the reliability approach to internal control evaluation。Decision Sciences,12(1),51-67。  new window
15.Yusof, S. M.、Aspinwall, E.(1999)。Critical success factors for total quality management implementation in small and medium enterprises。Total Quality Management,10(4/5),803-809。  new window
16.Black, S. A.、Porter, L. J.(1996)。Identification of critical factors of TQM。Decision Sciences,27,1-21。  new window
17.Johnson, J. R.、Leitch, R. A.、Neter, J.(1981)。Characteristics of errors in accounts receivable and inventory audits。Accounting Review,56(2),72-78。  new window
18.Kaplan, D.、Krishnan, R.、Padman, R.、Peters, J.(1988)。Assessing data quality in accounting information systems。Communications of the ACM,41(2),72-78。  new window
19.Stocks, M. H.、Harrell, A.(1995)。The impact of an increase in accounting information level on the judgment quality of individuals and groups。Accounting, Organizations and Society,20(7/8),685。  new window
20.Saraph, J. V.、Benson, P. G.、Schroeder, R. G.(1989)。An instrument formeasuring the critical factors of quality management。Decision Sciences,20(4),810-829。  new window
21.Xu, H.、Nord, J. H.、Nord, G. D.、Lin, B.(2003)。Key issues of accounting information quality management: Australian case studies。Industrial Management and Data System,103(7),461-470。  new window
22.Ballou, D. P.、Pazer, H. L.(1985)。Modeling data and process quality in multi-input, multi-output information systems。Management Science,31(2)。  new window
23.Cusing, B. E.(1974)。A Mathematical Approach to the Analysis and Design of Internal Control Systems。The Accounting Reviews,49(1),24-41。  new window
學位論文
1.胡益芬(2000)。校務基金經營管理之探討--以清華大學為例(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張允文(2002)。環境,策略與組織內部特質對會計資訊系統效能之影響(博士論文)。國立中山大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.沈佩蒂(1998)。以資料品質的觀點管理終端使用者電腦化的探索性研究(博士論文)。國立交通大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.姚秋旺(2002)。最新政府會計(含非營利會計)。姚秋旺。  延伸查詢new window
2.教肓部(1998)。國立大學校院校務基金制度宣導手冊問答彙編。  延伸查詢new window
3.English, L. P.(1999)。Improving Data Warehouse and Business Information Quality: Methods for Reducing Costs and Increasing profits。Wiley。  new window
4.Huang, K. T.、Lee, Y. W.、Wang, R. Y.(1999)。Quality Information and Knowledge。Upper Saddle River, NJ。  new window
5.Miles, Matthew B.、Huberman, A. Michael、Newman, G.(1994)。Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook。Sage Publications。  new window
圖書論文
1.鄭丁旺(1995)。當前大學教育環境及其因應之道。會計與管理。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE