:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:外溢效果下之最適補貼率
書刊名:農業經濟半年刊
作者:許義忠
作者(外文):Hsu, Yi-chung
出版日期:2004
卷期:76
頁次:頁87-107
主題關鍵詞:外溢效果補貼率污染排放SpilloversSubsidy rateEmission
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:25
本文主要討論:若廠商之防污努力的投入具有外溢效果,則政府在訂定最適補貼率時,有無將外溢效果納入考量對補貼率訂定之影響。其次,本文亦討論當政府訂定補貼率時,外溢效果存在的考量與否,對廠商之最適產量及污染排放量之影響與傳統文獻不同。根據本文研究發現,若政府在訂定補貼率時亦將外溢效果納入考量,則可減低補貼對廠商產量之衝擊,使產量較接近最適產量。另外,加入外溢效果之考量後,補貼所達成之降低污染排放水準亦不致被高估。
According to the discovery of this article, if the spillover effect has be taken into consideration by the government when deciding the subsidy rate, it may decrease the impact on the output of the merchant, and enabling the output comparatively to approach the optimal output. Moreover, the subsidy can help to achieve in reducing the pollution discharge, which cannot be overestimated.
期刊論文
1.Jones, C. A.(1989)。Standard-setting with incomplete enforcement revisited。Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,8(1),72-87。  new window
2.Harford, J. D.(1987)。Self-Reporting of Pollution and the Firm's Behavior under Imperfectly Enforceable Regulations。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,14(3),293-303。  new window
3.Innes, R.(1999)。Remediation and self-reporting in optimal law enforcement。Journal of Public Economics,72,379-393。  new window
4.Malik, Arun S.(1993)。Self-Reporting and the Design of Policies for Regulating Stochastic Pollu-tion。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,24,241-257。  new window
5.Andreoni, James、Erard, Brian、Feinstein, Jonathan(1998)。Tax Compliance。Journal of Economic Literature,36(2),818-860。  new window
6.Harford, J. D.(1978)。Firm Behavior under Imperfectly Enforceable Pollution Standards and Taxes。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,5(1),26-43。  new window
7.Malik, A. S.(1992)。Enforcement costs and the choice of policy instruments for controlling pollution。Economic Inquiry,30,714-721。  new window
8.Scotchmer, S.、Jones, C. A.(1990)。The social cost of uniform regulatory standards in a hierarchical government。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,19,61-72。  new window
9.黃宗煌(1991)。直接管制與污染稅的經濟分析。經濟論文,19(2),135-181。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Burrows, P.(1979)。Pigovian Taxes, Polluter Subsidies, Regulation, and the Size of a Polluting Industry。The Canadian Journal of Economics=Revue canadienne d'Economique,12,494-501。  new window
11.郭虹瑩、黃鴻、麥朝成(2001)。污染排放限量規定下環境政策的選擇。人文及社會科學集刊,13(2),195-229。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.謝琦強、楊重信(2001)。相對污染者付費原則下預算平衡式環境政策效果之探討。臺灣土地金融季刊,38,185-206。  延伸查詢new window
13.Chander, P.、Wilde, L. L.(1998)。A General Characterization of Optimal income Tax Enforcement。The Review of Economic Studies,65(1),165-183。  new window
14.Santore, R.、Robison, H. D.、Klein, Y.(2001)。Strategic state-level environmental policy with asymmetric pollution spillovers。Journal of Public Economics,80(2),199-224。  new window
15.宋玉生(1999)。提高廠商守法率之賽局機制設計。經濟論文叢刊,27(4),461-482。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉育民(1993)。環境經濟誘因政策之分析,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Baumol, W. J.、Oates, W. E.(1975)。The Theory of Environmental Policy, Externalities, Public Outlays, and the Quality of Life。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE