:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:滬港兩地教師推行Project Learning觀感的比較研究
書刊名:教育學報
作者:湯才偉朱嘉穎
作者(外文):Tong, Choi-waiChu, Ka-wing
出版日期:2005
卷期:33:1/2
頁次:頁207-220
主題關鍵詞:教育改革教師教學專業發展
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:42
每當教育成為社會關心的問題,有關政府就不得不對教育提出改善的構想。這些構想也就成為由上而下的教育改革措施,而這些措施不少是屬於課堂教學上的新要求。要想這些要求產生預期的效果,就必須有教師的配合。但在實際的改革過程中,教師在教學技巧或觀念的層面上,往往都不易轉變過來。上海的研究性學習和香港的專題研習在學校的推行就是一個很好的例證。本文擇取兩地教師在學校實施研究性學習/專題研習時所遇到的困難為入手點,透過一個小規模的兩地教師個案比較研究,嘗試從教師的知識、技能和信念等因素來分析教師在專業發展(professional development)過程中所面對的困難,並從而解釋某些改革的推行措施失效的原因。最後,本文亦提出大學如何可以在改革中為社會、學校、教師擔當支援改變的角色(change agent),令改革構想得以有效落實。
Whenever education becomes an issue that arouses public concern, the government involved will have to put forward some ideas to improve education. Such ideas will then develop into top-down education reform measures. A number of these measures pertain to new demands in classroom teaching. For such demands to achieve any expected results, it is essential to have coordination from teachers. However, when such measures are put into practice, teachers often find it difficult to make changes in terms of skills or perceptions about teaching. In Shanghai and Hong Kong, implementing project learning in schools illuminates this very well. In this study, difficulties encountered by teachers of the two cities in carrying out project learning were selected as an entry point. Then, using a small-scale comparative case study of the teachers in these two cities, attempts were made to analyze difficulties encountered by teachers in terms of professional development, taking into account factors such as teachers’ knowledge, skills, and beliefs. Through these attempts, reasons for lacking effects for certain implemented reform measures were explained. Finally, suggestions were made on how university can take the role of a change agent in supporting the society, schools, and teachers during the reform, such that the reform ideas can be effectively implemented.
期刊論文
1.王婭娟(2001)。研究性學習與教師觀念的轉變。山東教育學院學報,2001(6),17-18。  延伸查詢new window
2.付英、金桂林(2002)。應用認知心理學原理轉變教師角色和職能。四川教育學院學報,18(9),18-21。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳秀芳、郭軍(2004)。研究性學習與教師角色的轉變。西北成人教育學報,2004(1),71-75。  延伸查詢new window
4.周玉娟(2003)。研究性學習引發的教師角色轉變。黔南民施師範學院學報,2003(2),43-45。  延伸查詢new window
5.邰鷺明(2003)。新課程中教師角色定位的轉換。廈門教育學院學報,5(4),42-47。  延伸查詢new window
6.胥永華(2001)。研究性學習課程對教師的挑戰和教師的應對策略。遼寧教育學院學報,18(11),46-48。  延伸查詢new window
7.曾躍霞(2003)。新標準需要有新的課堂溝通方式。鄖陽師範高等專科學校學報,23(1),115-118。  延伸查詢new window
8.鄂生碧、張應年(2004)。建構主義教學模式下的研究性學習探討。甘肅高師學報,9(2),84-86。  延伸查詢new window
9.魏忠元(2004)。教師角色的轉換--略談研究性學習對教師提出的要求。昌吉學院學報,2004(1),77-78。  延伸查詢new window
10.Boote, D. N.(2003)。Teacher educators as belief-and-attitude therapists: Exploring psychodynamic implications of an emerging role。Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice,9(3),257-277。  new window
11.Davis, K. S.(2003)。''Change is hard'': What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices。Science Education,87(1),3-30。  new window
12.Grossman, P. L.(1989)。Learning to teach without teacher education。Teachers College Record,91(2),191-208。  new window
13.Grundy, S.、Robison, J.、Tomazos, D.(2001)。Interrupting the way things are: Exploring new directions in school/university partnerships。Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,29(3),203-217。  new window
14.Kwakman, K.(2003)。Factors affecting teachers' participation in professional learning activities。Teaching and Teacher Education,19(2),149-170。  new window
圖書
1.課程發展議會(2002)。基礎教育課程指引--各盡所能,發揮所能(小一至中三)。課程發展議會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bereday, George Z. F.(1964)。Comparative Method in Education。Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
圖書論文
1.袁振國(2002)。教育家的誕生(代序)。教育新理念。北京:教育科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2001)。普通高中"研究性學習"實施指南(試行)。從理念到實踐:解讀研究性學習。北京:國家高級教育行政學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.Louis, K. S.、Kruse, S. D.、Marks, H. M.(1996)。Schoolwide professional community。Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
4.Turbill, J.(2002)。The role of a facilitator in a professional learning system: The frameworks project。Teacher learning for educational change: A systems thinking approach。Buckingham:Philadelphia, PA:Open University Press。  new window
5.Munby, H.、Russell, T.、Martin, A. K.(2001)。Teachers' Knowledge and How It Develops。Handbook of Research on Teaching。American Educational Research Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE