:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:網球發球動作之分析
書刊名:成大體育
作者:詹建人
作者(外文):Chan, Chien-jen
出版日期:2005
卷期:38:1=44
頁次:頁69-77
主題關鍵詞:網球發球平擊式發球側旋式發球上旋式發球Tennis serveFlat serveSlice serveKick serve
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:30
  本研究目的在於了解網球發球揮拍擊球過程中,三種不同之擊球方式(平擊式發球、側旋式發球、上旋式發球)揮擊時拍頭的軌跡、變化,並比較其拋球拉拍及揮拍擊球時其拍頭軌跡之差異。受試者為國家級(A 級)網球教練一名,年齡為34歲,身高為179公分,球齡為26年,右手持拍。受試者向同一目標發球區發球,每種發球方式皆發十球,手筆記錄受測者每次發球有致或無故。測試時將每球揮擊之球拍影像傳入電腦分析,去除無效之發球,使用有效發球進行分析研究,依照數位影像與比例尺轉換出尺寸並訂出空間座標,依每畫格0.02秒為一畫面取標誌點並製作軌跡圖與重疊影像圖,計算出運動學參數,位移、速度與加速度等參數,得到運動學參數、空間模型與軌跡變化圈。結果發現:一、隨著擊球方式的不同,拋球及擊球的位置也會改變。在拉拍動作之預備動作至後舉抓背動作中,三種發球方式之差異並不明顯,但延續至拋球動作後,三種發球方式隨即有了改變。平擊式發球之拉拍動作所做球拍軌跡圓弧為最小;側旋式發球之球拍軌跡圓弧為最大,其拋球點之不同為一主要原因。在揮擊動作完整結束後,三種發球方式之收拍動作位置並無明顯差異。二、拋球時之拋球高度及拋球位置等因素需控制得宜,否則便無法將力量集中於一最理想之擊球點而發出理想之發球。三、要發出強而有力之發球,需要利用膝蓋之彈性,藉由腹肌、膝蓋、手腕三個部分共同來完成,擊球時手肘的彎曲也是絕對需要的一部份。
  The purpose of this study was to investigate the analysis between three kinds of different tennis serving motions (flat serve, slice serve and kick serve) . The right-handed male is a Taiwan national tennis coach, who is 34 years old, 179 centimeters tall, and also he has been playing tennis for 26 years. He served 10 times for the same target by three kinds of serving; the effective and ineffective serves were recorded. Computer analyzed each serve of image, the effective serve were analyzed and the ineffective serves were deleted. According the digital image data and engineer's scale data transfer to the dimension, and conclude the coordinate. Every block was 0.02 second and found the data to make into the coordinate of track and the image of overlap, to calculate the data of kinetics, movement, speed and acceleration. These data were be used to make into the coordinate of kinetic data, the model of space and the picture of changing track. The result showed that the positions of hitting were changing between three kinds of different tennis serving motions. Although the differences were not so clear from the hands up motion to the back-scratch motion, the tracks of the different kinds of tennis serving motions were changing after the toss motion. The swing motion of flat serve was the smallest and the slice serve was the biggest due to the hitting point of toss up. The positions of swing down motion were almost the same after the follow-through motion. The height and the position of the toss were very important to powerful serve. It needs the resilience of knee, abdomen and wrist to serve powerfully, and also the curve of elbow was very important.
期刊論文
1.Drysdale, C.(2001)。摧毀性的發球。國際網球雜誌,45,60-61。  延伸查詢new window
2.Goldfine, D.(2000)。精通上旋發球的三部曲。國際網球雜誌,43,39-40。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.莊宜達(1994)。網球平擊式發球上肢關節之力學分析(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳帝佑(2002)。網球拍纖維材質與排列角度對擊球反應之分析(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.黃俊清(1992)。網球平擊式發球之運動學分析(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.林坤燃(2000)。網球平擊式發球之生物力學分析(碩士論文)。中國文化大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.張本卿(2002)。網球技術報告書(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.王苓華(2002)。網球截擊之三維運動與動量分析(碩士論文)。國立台灣體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李懷志(1998)。網球技巧。台北市:益群書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.莊建民(1981)。網球訓練圖說。台北市:華聯出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Roetert, P.、Groppel, J.(2001)。World-class tennis technique。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
4.Brown, J.(1995)。Tennis--steps to success。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
5.張清泉(1988)。網球發球理論與技術研究。台北:體育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE