:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:體育學習策略量表之編製研究--以南臺科技大學為例
書刊名:成大體育
作者:陳春安 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Chun-an
出版日期:2006
卷期:39:1=48
頁次:頁67-80
主題關鍵詞:體育學習策略Physical educationLearning strategies
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:41
  • 點閱點閱:53
  本研究目的是在編製一份可了解大學生體育學習策略的評斷工具。先以體育學習策略預試量表對372位大學生施測後,經探索性因素分析與各分量表項目分析等方法,結果顯示體育學習策略由五個因素構成,包含「學習態度」、「訊息處理」、「情結控制」、「時間管理」、「考試準備」計有27題成為正式量表。以正式量表對351位學生進行第二次預試,再進行信度與技度的考驗,以建構量表的信效度,本量表各因素的內部一致性係數為.673-.892與隔二週的重測信度.697~.930 ,以體育學習表現來驗證辨別效度及技標關聯放度,以因素分析考驗建構效度,所能解釋總變異量為59.06%,結果顯示本量表其有良好的信效度,確實可以提供國內體育教師了解大學生的體育學習策略。
  The goal of this study was to develop an assessment tool that could realize university students' physical education learning strategies. First applying physical education learning strategy pre-test measurement table on 372 university students, through the steps of exploratory element analysis and each individual table's item analysis, then the result showed the learning strategues were composed of five elements including "learning attitude", "information processing", "emotion control", "time management", and "exam preparation", the formal measurement table was made up by 27 questions in total. Based on the formal measurement table applying the 2nd pre-test on 351 students and conducting the examination of the credibility and validity to construct the credibility and validity of the measurement table, the coefficient of inner consistency of individual element in this table was .673-.892, and the coefficient of re-test after the interval of two weeks was .697-.930, with the performance of physical education learning to prove the discriminate validity and criterion-related validity, and with the element analysis to examine the construction validity, the sum of variable amount which could be interpreted was 59.06%, the outcome showed this table was having good credibility and validity that could provide physical education teachers to realize the learning strategies of university students.
期刊論文
1.Warr, Peter、Downing, Jonathon(2000)。Learning strategies, learning anxiety and knowledge acquisition。British Journal of Psychology,91(3),311-333。  new window
2.陳李綢(19950500)。有效學習策略的研究與應用。學生輔導,38,40-47。  延伸查詢new window
3.Corno, Lyn(1993)。The Best-Laid Plans: Modern Conceptions of Volition and Educational Research。Educational Researcher,22(2),14-22。  new window
4.Zimmerman, B. J.、Martinez-Pons, M.(1986)。Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self regulated learning strategies。American Educational Research Journal,23(4),614-628。  new window
5.Pintrich, Paul R.、De Groot, Elisabeth V.(1990)。Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance。Journal of Educational Psychology,82(1),33-40。  new window
學位論文
1.程炳林(1991)。國民中小學生激勵的學習策略之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.向天屏(2000)。國中小學生成就目標導向、學習策略、自我跛足策略與學業成就關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.魏麗敏(1996)。影響國小兒童數學成就之自我調節學習與情感因素分析及其策略訓練效果之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.洪寶蓮(1990)。大學生學習與讀書策略量表之修訂及調查研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Mayer, Richard E.(1987)。Educational Psychology: A Cognitive Approach。Don Mills:HaperCollins Publisher。  new window
2.李金泉(1993)。SPSS/PC+實務與應用統計分析。臺北市:松崗電腦圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.張紹勳、林秀娟(1995)。SPSS For Windows統計分析:初等統計與高等統計。臺北市:松崗電腦圖書資料股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.McKeachie, W. J.,Pintrich, P. R.,Lin, Y.,Smith, D.(1987)。Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of the research literature,Ann Arbor, MI:National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning (NCRIPTAL)。(ED 314999)。  new window
圖書論文
1.李睞吟(1997)。學習策略的診斷與輔導。學習輔導。台北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Dansereau, D. F.(1987)。Cooperative learning strategies。Learning and study strategies。New York:Academic Press。  new window
3.王俊明(1999)。問卷與量表的編製及分析方法。體育測驗與評價。台北市:中華民國體育學會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE