:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小學童交通安全教育課程學習成效之研究--以國立嘉義大學附設實驗國民小學為例
書刊名:運輸計劃
作者:張立言高嘉蓮
作者(外文):Chang, Li-yenKao, Chia-lien
出版日期:2006
卷期:35:2
頁次:頁261-279
主題關鍵詞:交通安全教育交通標誌交通法規隨機化集區設計巢形實驗設計Traffic educationTraffic signTraffic regulationRandomized block designUnbalanced nested design
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:52
交通安全教育是臺灣地區改善整理交通安全重要的一環,近年來國內推動九年一貫教育,在課程內容有增無減的情況下,大多數學校之交通安全教育課程無法在固定時段實施,僅能在彈性實習節數實施,而細的執行情形則由班導師視其他課程之進度決定。整體而言,交通安全教育課程的實施未受到應有之重視。因此要如何讓交通安全教育在有限之時間內發揮最大效果,實有必要針對交通安全教育之設計(如教學法、教學時數和教學材料)等深入探討。因此本研究應用實驗設計方法分析同教學情境下國小學童對於交通標誌、標線與號誌以及交通常識之學習成效。以國立嘉義大學附屬小學之二、三年級學童(各5個班級)為研究對象,以隨機抽樣的方式將其中4個班級作為實驗組,1個班級作為對照組,不同教學法、教學時數、與教學材料之教學活動組合亦以隨機的方式於實驗組班級實施,對照組則未實施任何交通安全課程。實驗結果顯示多數之實組班級之學童於實施教學後對交通標誌、標線與號誌以及交通常識之認知程度有明顯進步,對照組則無明顯差異,顯示交通安全課程之實施有助於增進學童對交通安全之認識。在低年級部分,透過隨機化集區實驗設計分析結果顯示教學法與學時數會著影響學童之學習成效;但學童性別與其學業成就表現並不會顯著影響學習成效。在中年級部分,巢形實驗設計分析結果顯示教學方法會著影響學習成效。依據分析結果,本研究針對未來國內小學交通安全教育之教學活動設計提出建議,期望能提供給國小教師及相關單位規劃交通安全教學活動之參考。
Traffic education program is an essential part of national transportation safety programs in Taiwan. However, traffic education program has not received enough attention and has been conducted on a non-regular basis in the elementary schools. To make the traffic education program more effective within limited time and resources, teaching strategies, methods, and materials should be carefully examined. This study applied statistically designed experiments to asses how different teaching strategies can affect the learning outcomes of traffic education for elementary school students. The 2nd and 3rd grade students at Chia-Yi Experimental Elementary School were selected in this study. Four of the five classes in each grade were randomly assigned to the experimental groups, and the fifth class was assigned to the control group. The experimental groups received various teaching treatments, including hours of teaching, teaching methods, and/or teaching materials. The control group received pre- and post-tests only. The comparisons between education and control groups show that traffic education can significantly increase the students’ traffic knowledge. For the 2nd grade students, randomized block design was applied to evaluate their leaning outcomes of traffic control devices and the results indicated that hours of teaching and teaching method can significantly influence the learning outcomes, while the gender and student’s academic performance (treated as the block) did not have significant influence. For the 3rd grade students, the imbalanced nested design was used to evaluate their leaning outcomes of traffic rules and the results indicated that teaching method can significantly influence the learning outcomes. This study concluded that traffic education program can increase the knowledge of traffic safety for the elementary school students and also provided the practical suggestions for the designs of traffic education programs.
期刊論文
1.Lam, L. T.(2001)。Factors associated with parental safe road behaviour as a pedestrian with young children in metropolitan New South Wales, Australia。Accident Analysis & Prevention,33(2),203-210。  new window
2.Van Schagen, I.、Rothengatter, T.(1997)。Classroom Instruction Versus Roadside Training in Traffic Safety Education。Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,18(2),283-292。  new window
3.Zeedyk, M. S.、Wallace, L.、Spry, L.(2002)。Stop, look, listen, and think? What young children really do when crossing the road。Accident Analysis & Prevention,34(1),43-50。  new window
4.Owsley, C.、Stalvey, B. T.、Phillips, J. M.(2003)。The Efficacy of an Educational Intervention in Promoting Self-regulation among High-risk Older Drivers。Accident Analysis and Prevention,35(3),393-400。  new window
5.Fockler, S. K. F.、Vavrik, J.、Kristiansen, L.(1998)。Motivating Drivers to Correctly Adjust Head Restraints: Assessing Effectiveness of Three Different Interventions。Accident Analysis and Prevention,30(6),773-780。  new window
6.Johansson, B.、Drott, P.(2001)。Informal Parental Traffic Education and Children's Bicycling Behavior。Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences,106(2),133-144。  new window
7.Cross, D.、Stevenson, M.、Hall, M.、Burns, S.、Laughlin, D.、Howat, P.(2000)。Child Pedestrian Injury Prevention Project: Student Results。Preventive Medicine,30(3),179-187。  new window
8.Connelly, Marie L.、Conaglen, Helen M.、Parsonson, Barry S.、Isler, Robert B.(1998)。Child Pedestrians' Crossing Gap Thresholds。Accident Analysis and Prevention,30(4),443-453。  new window
9.Al-Madani, H.、Al-Janahi, A. R.(2002)。Role of Drivers’ Personal Characteristics in Understanding Traffic Sign Symbols。Accident Analysis and Prevention,34(2),185-196。  new window
10.Chang, C. Y.(2002)。The Impact of Different Forms of Multimedia CAI on Students' Science Achievement。Innovations in Education and Teacher International,39(4),280-288。  new window
11.Quilter, S. M.、Chester, C.(2001)。The Relationship between Web-based Conferencing and Instructional Outcome。International Journal of Instructional Media,28(1),13-21。  new window
12.Nikolova, O.、Taylor, G.(2003)。The Impact of a Language Learning Task on Instructional Outcomes in Two Student Populations: High-Ability and Average-Ability Students。The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education,14(4),205-217。  new window
13.Perry-Casler, S. M.、Price, J. H.、Telljohann, S. K.、Chesney, B. K.(1997)。National Assessment of Early Elementary Teachers’ Perceived Self-efficacy for Teaching Tobacco Prevention Based on the CDC Guidelines。Journal of School Health,67(8),348-355。  new window
14.Lohrmann, D. K.、Blake, S.、Collins, T.、Windsor, R.、Parrillo, A. V.(2001)。Evaluation of School-based HIV Prevention Education Programs in New Jersey。Journal of School Health,71(6),207-212。  new window
15.Mattson, B. W.(2003)。The Effects of Alternative Reports of Human Resource Development Results on Managerial Support。Human Resource Development Quarterly,14(2),127-158。  new window
16.Jones, B. T.、Jones, B. C.、Thomas, A. P.、Piper, J.(2003)。Alcohol Consumption Increases Attractiveness Ratings of Opposite-sex Faces: A Possible Third Route to Risky Sex。Jessica Addiction,98(8),1069-1075。  new window
17.Horberry, T.、Halliday, M.、Gale, A. G.(2002)。Bridge Strike Reduction: Optimizing the Design of Markings。Accident Analysis and Prevention,34(5),581-588。  new window
18.Montgomery, D. C.、Keats, J. B.、Perry, L. A.、Thompson, J. R.、Messina, W. S.(2000)。Using Statistically Designed Experiments for Process Development and Improvement: An Application in Electronics Manufacturing。Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing,16(1),55-63。  new window
19.Lee, S. C.(2001)。Development of instructional strategy of computer application software for group instruction。Computers and Education,37(1),1-9。  new window
20.Kekkonen-Moneta, S.、Moneta, G. B.(2002)。E-Learning in Hong Kong: comparing learning outcomes in online multimedia and lecture versions of an introductory computing course。British Journal of Educational Technology,33(4),423-433。  new window
學位論文
1.吳雅惠(2002)。國小學童對交通安全標誌之認識度研究(碩士論文)。國立臺南大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳雅慧(2002)。國民小學交通安全教育課程教材之建構研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.曾文毅(2000)。國民小學交通安全教育之探討研究(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gagne, R. M.(1985)。The conditions of learning。Fort Worth:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers。  new window
2.陳順宇、鄭碧娥(2003)。實驗設計。華泰書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.交通部、教育部(2003)。交通安全學習手冊。  延伸查詢new window
4.Montgomery, D. C.(1991)。Design and Analysis of Experiments。John Wiley & Sons。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE