:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:農村路網系統對景觀生態格局衝擊分析與評估
書刊名:造園學報
作者:蔡厚男 引用關係邱淑美
作者(外文):Tsai, Hou-nanChiu, Shu-mei
出版日期:2006
卷期:12:2
頁次:頁1-34
主題關鍵詞:農村路網系統景觀生態格局景觀碎裂交通寧靜區景觀連結Rural road networkLandscape patternLandscape fragmentationTraffic calmed rural areaTCRALandscape connectivity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:20
2002年臺灣政府正式宣示國家永續發展願景之後,區域與地方路網系統的佈設如何兼顧農村生活與農業結構調整,提供安全寧適的住行環境,健全農村生態網絡,落實農村有機成長的願景與目標,確為當前國土保安及保育的重要課題之一。本研究以量化方法分析農村景觀生態格局與路網系統的交互關係,選擇花東縱谷稻米主要生產區--富里鄉、池上鄉、關山鎮等區域作為研究範圍,礙於篇幅本文僅呈現富里的分析過程與結果。根據農林航空測量所2001年新版臺灣地區相片基本圖,應用地理資訊系統為分析工具,評估農村路網佈設對農業地景碎裂的影響,同時運用交通寧靜區和景觀連結等概念進行路網最佳路徑分析,比較路網調整前後之景觀生態格局變化,模擬永續農村路網調整方案,以減輕農村路網對區域地景碎裂的負面衝擊。實證研究結果發現本研究三個樣區農業地景結構相似性極高,路網調整後三個樣區之整體碎裂度均降低;以富里鄉為例,其景觀格局受到大型林業景觀類型所主導,模擬比較路網調整前後,其主要景觀類型之優勢度更為明顯,為三個樣區中最受到林業景觀類型強烈主導的樣區;顯示農村路網的系統佈設和路徑調整確實會對區域地景格局特性產生無形且深遠的環境影響。
Since Taiwan government has declared the future national comprehensive development should be on the basis of sustainability in 2002, it pronounced a new view on transport planning that would give equal weight to accessibility and economy. It's the turning time for us to pursuit the dynamic balance among infrastructure, ecology and community all around the country. This research focuses on presenting the method and formulae to quantify the effect of landscape fragmentation by rural road network. It chooses FuLi, ChihSang and KwanShan of HuaTung Longitudinal Valley, where are the major areas of rice production, as the study area. But this article only presents the outcome of empirical study in Fuli because of the limited pages. Furthermore, the study adopt 2001 Taiwan aerial photos, completed by Agricultural and Forestry Aerial Survey Institute as basic maps and utilize GIS as an analytic tool to evaluate the landscape pattern and its impact on rural landscape fragmentation from road network. Finally, the result of this research tries to integrate both the concerning spatial concepts of accessibility and the “traffic calmed rural area” (TCRA) to merge the sustainable road network and to promote landscape connectivity in order to reduce the fragmentation effects in the expanding rural areas. The result of this empirical study includes each and all landscape structure of FuLi, ChihSang and KwanShan, which have a very high similarity. The landscape pattern of FuLi is dominated by huge forest pattern. After the adjustment of road network, the level of landscape fragmentation at three sample areas is lower down than the level before the adjustment. The landscape pattern of FuLi is the most influenced sample area by specific landscape type with strong domination among three chosen sample areas. The conclusion indeed shows the rural road network and its traffic flows always cause impacts on the landscape fragmentation among national, regional and local scale, as well as can reduce the fragmentation effects in the expanding rural areas by merging the sustainable road network..
期刊論文
1.Turner, Monica Goigel(1989)。Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process。Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,20(1),171-197。  new window
2.Corry, R. C.、Nassauer, J. I.(2005)。Limitations of Using Landscape Pattern Indices to Evaluate the Ecological Consequences of Alternative Plans and Designs。Landscape and Urban Planning,72(4),265-280。  new window
3.Forman R.T.T. and Alexander, L. E.(1998)。Roads and Their Major Ecological Effects。Annual Review of Ecoloay and Systematics,29,207-231。  new window
4.Forman, R. T. T.(1998)。Road Ecology: A Solution for the Giant Embracing Us。Landscape Ecology,13,35,16。  new window
5.Gulinck, H.、Pauwels, F.(2000)。Changing Minor Rural Road Networks in Relation to Landscape Sustainability and Farming Practices in West Europe。Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,77(1-2),95-99。  new window
6.Jaarsma, C. F.、Willems, G. P. A.(2002)。Reducing Habitat Fragmentation by Minor Rural Roads through Traffic Claming。Landscape and Urban Planning,58(2-4),125-135。  new window
7.Jaarsma, C. F.(1997)。Approach for the Planning of Rural Road Networks According to Sustainable Land Use Planning。Landscape and Urban Planning,39(1),47-54。  new window
8.Van Bohemen, H. D.、Van de Laak, W. H. J.(2003)。The Influence of Road Infrastructure and Traffic on Soil, Water, and Air Quality。Environmental Management,31(1),50-68。  new window
會議論文
1.Forman, R. T. T.(2003)。Road ecology: A Look behind the Book and the Field618-625。  new window
2.Harris, L. K.、Pearson, B.(2003)。Process and Planning Enhancements: Roadway Design with the Environment in Mind: A New Process for Pima County。Arizona。607。  new window
3.Forman, R. T. T.(2003)。Road ecology: A Look behind the Book and the Field618-625。  new window
研究報告
1.許添本(2000)。農村永續交通規劃策略之研究。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Forman, R. T. T.、Sperling, D.、Bissonette, J. A.、Clevenger, A. P.、Cutshall, C. D.、Dale, V. H.、Fahrig, L.、France, R.、Goldman, C. R.、Heanue, K.、Jones, J. A.、Swanson, F. J.、Turrentine, T.、Winter, T. C.(2002)。Road Ecology : science and solutions。Washington, DC:Brighid Willson。  new window
2.鄔建國(2000)。景觀生態學--格局、過程、尺度與等級。北京:高等教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.交通部運輸研究所(2001)。2001年台灣地區公路容量手冊。台北:交通部。  延伸查詢new window
4.Farina, A.(1998)。Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology。New York:Chapman & Hall。  new window
5.Forman, R. T. T.、Godron, M.(1986)。Landscape Ecology。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
6.Forman, R. T. T.(1995)。Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions。Cambridge:Cambridge Univeisity Press。  new window
7.鼎漢國際工程顧問股份有限公司、世界銀行(1999)。永續運輸--論政策改革之優先課題。台北:鼎漢工程顧問股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.交通部運輸研究所(1999)。第三期台灣地區整體運輸系統規劃--整體運輸系統供需預測與分析。台北:交通部運輸研究所。  延伸查詢new window
9.Canters, K. eds.(1997)。Habitat, Fragmentation And Infrastructure。Deift, Netherlands:Ministry of Transportation, Public Works and Water Management。  new window
10.Evink ,G.L., P. Garrett, D. Zeigler,、J. Berry eds.(1996)。Trends in Addressing Transportation Related Wildlife Morality。Florida Department of Transportation:Publication FL-ER-58-96.Tallahassee。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE