:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:試論聯綿詞組構要素的歷史變化與發展--以《經典釋文》音義注釋為主
書刊名:漢學研究
作者:李正芬 引用關係
作者(外文):Li, Jeng-fen
出版日期:2006
卷期:24:2=49
頁次:頁105-133
主題關鍵詞:聯綿詞經典釋文音義陸德明漢魏晉南北朝Disyllabic rootsAnnotations of the Chinese classicsYinyiLu DemingHan and Six Dynasties
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:151
《經典釋文》記錄大量從漢代至南朝注釋家的音切及釋義,且兼存版本異文,本文以《釋文》注家所注釋的聯綿詞為對象,透過注家之音切、釋義、異文,比較形、音、義三者的差異。可發現各代注家多依當時標準替聯綿詞作了變更或改讀,使聯綿詞上下音節之形、音、義皆趨於和諧,因此其越趨嚴密的和諧性,應可說是經過時間演變或經過歷代整理的結果。 《釋文》當中聯綿詞變化和發展的方向,正顯示了漢代至南朝時期,對聯綿詞語言規律的認識。以靜態的共時研究而言,可以得知聯綿詞的特徵;以動態的歷時演變來看,則記錄了聯綿詞歷史性的連續變化。
A variety of spellings, annotations, and variants of diverse versions were made by different annotators from the Han to the Southern Dynasties, which are recorded in the Annotations of the Chinese Classics 經典釋文. This paper discusses the disyllabic roots in the Annotations of the Chinese Classics, and compares the differences of form, sound, and meaning through spellings, annotations, and variants. We can find that almost all the annotators at different times usually made changes to the disyllabic roots or sounds in order to make the form, sound, and meaning of two syllables of disyllabic roots much more harmonious than they were previously. These changes were considered to be the results of adjustments over a long period. In the work, Annotations of the Chinese Classics, there is a thorough understanding of language regularity of disyllabic roots from the Han to the Southern Dynasties. We can gain a rich knowledge of the features and characteristics of the disyllabic roots by comparing the changes that had been made by the different annotators of the same age; we can also realize the continuous changes of the disyllabic roots by analyzing historical developments.
期刊論文
1.江學旺(2000)。《說文解字》形聲字甲骨文源字考。古漢語研究,2000(2),2-6。  延伸查詢new window
2.李海霞(1999)。形聲字造字類型的消長。古漢語研究,1999(1),65-69。  延伸查詢new window
3.李正芬(1997)。《莊子》摹狀詞音義及其語言風格之關係。國際人文年刊,6,349-376。  延伸查詢new window
4.易敏(2002)。文選漢大賦用字中的義符類化現象。北京師範大學學報,2002(4),110-114。  延伸查詢new window
5.孫德宣(1943)。聯綿字淺說。輔仁學誌,11(1)/11(2),159-186。  延伸查詢new window
6.許惟賢(1988)。論聯綿字。南京大學學報,1988(2),199-208。  延伸查詢new window
7.郭小武(1993)。試論疊韻連綿字的統諧規律。中國語文,1993(3),209-216。  延伸查詢new window
8.董為光(1986)。漢語「異聲聯綿詞」初探。語言研究,1986(2),163-174。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.王若江(2002)。說文中的聯錦詞訓釋與許慎的聯綿詞意識。北京。247-253。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.徐振邦(1998)。聯綿詞概論。北京:大眾文藝出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.符定一(1961)。聯綿字典。臺北:臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.莊周、郭慶藩、王孝魚(1985)。莊子集釋。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.張有(2002)。復古編。合肥:安徽教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.周法高(1970)。中國語文論叢。臺北市:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.王念孫(2000)。讀書雜志。江蘇古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.王叔岷(1992)。先秦道法思想講稿。中央研究院中國文哲研究所。  延伸查詢new window
8.陸德明、黃坤堯、鄧仕梁(19880600)。新校索引經典釋文。臺北:學海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.王松木(2004)。聯綿詞的構造、功能與發展─循認知徑路找尋誤釋聯綿詞的原因。傳統訓詁學的現代轉化─從認知觀點看詞義演化的機制。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
10.沈建民(1988)。疊韻聯綿詞的聲調。李新魁教授紀念文集。北京。  延伸查詢new window
11.徐通鏘(1997)。結構的不平衡性和單字結構格局的解體。語言論─語義型語言的結構原理和研究方法。吉林。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(東漢)許慎(1992)。說文解字,北京。  延伸查詢new window
2.林尹(1985)。宋本廣韻,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.(明)方以智(1970)。通雅,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.(清)阮元(1986)。十三經注疏,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.沈兼士(1986)。「鬼」字原始意義之試探。沈兼士學術論文集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE