:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:學業性向測驗之語文與數學分量表編製研究
書刊名:考試學刊
作者:簡茂發何榮桂 引用關係區雅倫朱惠文潘莉瑩胡家祥陳麗明
作者(外文):Chien, Maw-faHo, Rong-gueyOu, Ya-lunChu, Hwei-wenPan, Li-yingHu, Jya-hsiangChen, Li-ming
出版日期:2006
卷期:1
頁次:頁29-48
主題關鍵詞:學業性向測驗語文量表數學量表高中生學習能力Aptitude testLanguage scaleMath scaleLearning potentiality
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:83
本研究旨在研發適合我國高一學生的學業性向測驗,內容依時序分階段完成。第一階段先發展「語文」、「數學」兩個分量表,後續再進行信度及效度分析與常模建立,並開發其他分量表。從分析學科考試與性向測驗答題反應中,顯示數學能力測驗作為文理分組的參考價值高於語文測驗。本語文分量表以測驗學生基本語文能力為目標,數學分量表為瞭解學生數學認知過程。本測驗編寫過程包括撰寫與編修試題、初試、專家諮詢會議,並對全國17 所高中職769 位高一學生進行語文與數學分量表的預試,其結果顯示語文與數學分量表分數略呈常態分布,難易度適中,鑑別度尚佳。由於後段試題通過率過低,建議正式試題宜降為25 題。
The purpose of this study was to develop the CEEC scholastic aptitude test for the first-year students of high schools in Taiwan. This test for measuring the outcomes of school instruction depended on high school curriculum to predict student’s learning potentiality. The research team designed and developed the verbal scale for measuring student’s basic verbal ability, and the mathematics scale for measuring student’s math cognitive process. The procedure of this study included item writing, item analysis, test construction, test tryout, and reliability study. The subjects for the preliminary study were 769 students from 17 high schools. The results of this study showed two scales had acceptable item difficulty and discrimination index. It was suggested that the decreased the number of items was necessary to improve test difficulty index.
期刊論文
1.盧欽銘、路君約(19860100)。通用性向測驗第二種編製報告。測驗年刊,33,3-6。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Carless, S. A.(1999)。Career assessment: Holland's vocational interests, personality characteristics, and abilities。Journal of Career Assessment,7,125-144。  new window
3.Descombes, J. P.(1974)。Relations among interests, aptitudes, and academic achievement of 129 Swiss students。Revue de Psychologie Applique,24,135-147。  new window
4.Foley, D. R.(2004)。Relationships among cognitive abilities, vocational aptitudes and vocational interests in at-risk eighth graders。Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences,65,67。  new window
5.Gustad, J. W.(1952)。Academic achievement and Strong occupational level scores。Journal of Applied Psychology,36,75-78。  new window
6.Jones, G. E.、Ree, M. J.(1998)。Aptitude test score validity: No moderating effect due to job ability requirement differences。Educational and Psychological Measurement,58,284-294。  new window
7.Kerr, W. D.、Willis, W. K.(1966)。Interest and ability: Are they related?。Vocational Guidance Quarterly,14,197-200。  new window
8.Lam, C. S.、Chan, F.、Hilburger, J.、Heimburger, M.(1993)。Canonical relationships between vocational interests and aptitudes。Vocational Evaluation & Work Adjustment Bulletin,26,155-160。  new window
9.Randahl, G. J.(1991)。A typological analysis of the relations between measured vocational interests and abilities。Journal of Vocational Behavior,38,333-350。  new window
10.Randahl, G. J.、Hansen, Jo-Ida C.、Haverkamp, B. E.(1993)。Instrumental behaviors following test administration and interpretation: Exploration validity of the Strong Interest Inventory。Journal of Counseling & Developmen,71,435-439。  new window
11.Rosnow, R. L.、Rosenthal, R.(1996)。Computing contrasts, effect sizes, and countemulls on other people's published data: General procedures for research consumers。Pyschological Methods,1,331-340。  new window
12.Super, D. E.(1985)。Coming of age in Middletown: Careers in the making。American Psychologist,40,405-414。  new window
會議論文
1.Chang, C.、Cheng, W.(2005)。Exploring interrelationships between student science achievement and their self-confidence and interest in science。Hawaii International Conference on Education。  new window
研究報告
1.王熙元、曾忠華、廖吉郎、李威熊、黃沛榮(1990)。國文科研究小組七十八年度研究報告。台北:大學入學考試中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.林光賢、李白飛、林佳蓉、林福來、王安蘭、蕭益林(1993)。大學入學考試數學科試題分析與命題設計研究報告。台北:大學入學考試中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.羅宗濤、簡宗梧、張雙英、何寄澎、劉莞莞、鄭明俐(1993)。大學入學考試國文科命題及作文評分之探討研究報告。台北:大學入學考試中心。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李維華(2004)。高職學生興趣與數學成績對實習課程(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李秉書(2003)。高一學生選組及其學業預測之研究--以自然組物理科為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.(1999)。區分性向測驗。台北市:中國行為科學社。  延伸查詢new window
2.美國勞工部就業服務處、中國測驗學會(1999)。通用性向測驗。台北市:行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局。  延伸查詢new window
3.路君約、陳淑美(1990)。輔導性向測驗指導手冊。臺北市:中國行為科學社。  延伸查詢new window
4.葛樹人(1988)。性向測驗。台北市:桂冠圖書。  延伸查詢new window
5.Anastasi(1997)。The evolution of psychology: Fifty years of the American Psychologist。Washington, D.C.:American Psychological Association。  new window
6.Brown, Frederick G.(1983)。Principles of educational and psychological testing。New York:Holt。  new window
7.Willingham, W. W.、Lewis, C.、Morgan, R.、Ramist, L.(1990)。Predicting college grades: An analysis of institutional trends over two decades。NJ.:Educational Testing Service。  new window
8.毛國楠、盧雪梅(2003)。中學多元性向測驗。台北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.路君約、盧欽銘、歐滄和(1994)。多因素性向測驗。臺北市:中國行為科學社。  延伸查詢new window
10.路君約、歐滄和(2003)。多向度性向測驗組合。台北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
11.簡茂發、吳鐵雄、吳清基、劉奕權、邱美玉、王俊明、何榮桂、潘慧玲(1993)。高一性向測驗。台北:中國行爲科學社。  延伸查詢new window
12.Anastasi, A.(1982)。Psychological testing。Macmillan。  new window
13.Ginzberg, Lori D.(1990)。Women and the Work of Benevolence: Morality, Politics, and Class in the 19th Centry United States。New Heaven, CT:Yale University Press。  new window
14.Cohen, J.(1988)。Statistical power and analysis for the behavioral sciences。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
15.Anderson, Lorin W.、Krathwohl, David R.、Airasian, Peter W.、Cruikshank, Kathleen A.、Mayer, Richard E.、Pintrich, Paul R.、Wittrock, Merlin C.、Raths, James(2001)。A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives。Addison Wesley Longman。  new window
圖書論文
1.Super, D. E.(1990)。A life-span, life-space approach to career developmen。Career choice and development: Applying contemporary theories to practice。San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE