:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:歐陽修詞淺探
書刊名:國立虎尾科技大學學報
作者:吳政翰
作者(外文):Wu, Jheng-han
出版日期:2006
卷期:25:4
頁次:頁57-70
主題關鍵詞:歐陽修歐陽修詞詞學主張創作分期Ou-yang SiouOu-yang Siou's lyricsAdvocacy of lyrics studyWorks by stages
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:16
歐陽修是北宋一代文宗,他在文學史上的地位,來自於他所帶領的古文運動之成功及身體力行地創作了許多優秀的詩文作品。從這些作品中,歐陽修莊重正義的形象顯而可見,但在他的詞作中,有一部分所反映出來的風格卻十分的婉轉纏綿,與詩文作品有極大的差別。前人認為此乃小人構陷歐陽修的偽作,不管是否如此,不能否認的是,這些詞作反映出歐陽修的部份形象,與他之前的詞家相較,不論內蘊以及技巧上,都有極大的進步。除了這些被認為是偽作的作品之外,歐陽修的詞作在各個時期的風格也有所不同,這些作品意境頗為闊大,對於後來的詞家有相當大的影響,因此前人認為歐陽修的詞作具有承先啟後的地位。基於此,本文希望藉由歐陽修詞學思想的探討,進一步瞭解其詞分期的風格,並確立他在詞史上的地位。
Ou-yang Siou, a distinguished litterateur of Northern Song Dynasty, played an important role on Chinese literature history, because he had successfully led the ancient style prose movement and had earnestly written many outstanding works. From these works, Ou-yang Siou’s image of solemeity and justice could be noticed obviously, but some works in his lyrics revealed a extremely euphemistical and affectional style which was enormously different from the style of his poetic and prosaic works. Some scholars of former times claimed that these lyrics were fabricated by mean literators to harm Ou-yang’s reputation; in spite of whether so, these lyrics did irrefragably reflect Ou-yang Siou’s practical image. To compare with other lyricists beforehand, no matter in the connotation of lyrics as well as in writing lyrics skill, he had made a gigantic progress. Besides these lyrics were considered fabrications; the style of his lyrics at every stage was different. These works with profound meaning had quite tremendous influence on the afterwards lyricists; thus, Ou-yang Siou was thought by the past people to be one who set a new course in Chinese literature while inheriting from the past simultaneously. Accordingly, I hope by means of this study on Ou-yang Siou’s lyrics approach to understand his lyrics style at every stage, and to establish his monumental status in lyrics literature history.
期刊論文
1.徐安琪(2001)。試論歐陽修的詞學思想。中國韻文學刊,1。  延伸查詢new window
2.龍建國、杜道群(1999)。歐陽修詞的創作分期及風格嬗變。吉安師專學報,20(1),28-32。  延伸查詢new window
3.羅家坤(2005)。簡論歐陽修的「詩詞分工論」及詞 作特色。天水師範學院學報,25(4)。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.歐陽脩(1967)。歐陽文忠公集。臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
2.趙崇祚(1965)。花間集。台北市:臺灣中華。  延伸查詢new window
3.馮延已、陳世修(1965)。陽春集。臺北縣 板橋市:藝文書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳振孫(1987)。直齋書錄題解。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.曾慥(1985)。樂府雅詞。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.孟元老(1965)。東京夢華錄。臺北板橋:藝文書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.僧文瑩(1991)。續湘山野錄。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.邱少華(2001)。歐陽修詞 新譯輯評。中國書店。  延伸查詢new window
9.張健(1982)。歐陽修之詩文及文學評論。台灣商務書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.林逸(1980)。歐陽修文忠公修年譜。台灣商務印書局。  延伸查詢new window
11.王鈞明、陳沚齋(1989)。歐陽修‧秦觀詞選。遠流出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.曾棗莊(1996)。歐陽修詩文賞析集。巴蜀書社。  延伸查詢new window
13.黃畬(1989)。歐陽修詞箋注。文史哲出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.嚴杰(1993)。歐陽修年譜。南京出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.謝桃坊(1992)。宋詞概論。四川文藝出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.陶爾夫、楊慶辰(2000)。晏歐詞傳。吉林人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.陶爾夫、諸葛憶兵(2005)。北宋詞史。黑龍江教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.馮煦(1967)。蒿庵論詞。台北縣永和:文海書局。  延伸查詢new window
19.歐陽修(1974)。六一詞。台北縣:華正書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.王國維(1978)。人間詞話。北京:人民文學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
21.脫脫(1965)。宋史。臺北:中華。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE