資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.133.92.138)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
英國習慣法上限制競業協議合法性之研究
書刊名:
東吳法律學報
作者:
王松柏
作者(外文):
Wang, Sung-po
出版日期:
2007
卷期:
18:3
頁次:
頁189-246
主題關鍵詞:
受僱人
;
雇主
;
勞動契約
;
限制競業協議
;
限制競業理論
;
競爭
;
誘引
;
顧客營業秘密
;
合法財產上利益
;
Employee
;
Employer
;
Employment contract
;
Restraint of trade covenant
;
Restraint of trade doctrine
;
Competition
;
Solicitation
;
Customer
;
Trade secrets
;
Legitimate proprietary interest
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:
4
點閱:77
勞動契約不只是勞務給付與工資給付的對價關係,更是雇主與受僱人間人的結合。因此在勞動契約持續期間,雇主對受僱人除有工資給付義務外,還有照扶、尊重對待等義務;受僱人對於雇主則有忠實為勞務給付義務、遵守雇主指揮命令、保守秘密的義務。 勞動契約終止後,勞雇雙方的上開義務即終止。受僱人可能趁著離職的機會自行創設與雇主事業經營性質相同的公司或另行受僱於原雇主的競爭對手以獲取較佳的勞動條件;原雇主則可能視離職受僱人的此種行為構成不公平競爭而欲加以防止。雇主為預防受僱人離職後與其競爭,可以與受僱人簽訂限制競業協議,禁止受僱人於離職後於一定期間、地域內對雇主為商業競爭行為。 對於限制競業協議,不論是我國或是英國皆未有制定法予以規範。唯基於契約自由原則,既然受僱人自願接受限制,除非約定的內容有違法之情事,否則法律似無干涉的理由。然而,此種協議對受僱人謀生能力的影響甚鉅,故英國習慣法經過數百年來判決先例的累積而發展出「限制競業協議理論」,對於限制競業協議的內容加以干預、審查,以求保障受僱人的權益,並在嚴格的條件下兼顧雇主的合法財產上利益。本文的主旨即在探討習慣法上限制競業理論的發展及該理論在司法實務土的運用方法。 本論文共分六部分。第一部分在於將討論的主題由勞動契約引入限制競業協議及此種協議所產生的爭議;第二部分則在探討英國實務土常見的五種限制競業協議類型及個別類型的利弊及功能。第三部分則在討論司法介入限制競業協議的理論發展及干預的基礎,以支持後續章節的討論。第四部分則就英國法院對於限制競業協議的內容所採的解釋方法,及當認為協議內容超出合理限制必要時,如何利用切割的方式予以限制作探討。第五部分則討論合法之限制競業協議必須符合哪些要件,其中包括雇主應對受僱人之不競業承諾提供對債、雇主需具有合法財產上的利益,以及限制競業的期間、地域範園、顧客範固必須合理等。於第六部分,本文除重申法律干預限制競業協議以保護受僱人權益的必要外,並就我國法院對限制競業協議的態度及行政機關的相關函示予以簡短介紹,以突顯兩國法律在發展上的差異。
以文找文
An employment contract is not only an exchange of labour and wages, but also an union between an employer and an employee. Thus, during the course of a contract of employment, apart from providing wages, an employer owns his employee a duty of care and a duty to treat him with respect. Meanwhile an employee has to serve his employer with loyalty, to obey the legitimate orders of his employer, and to exercise a duty of confidentiality. When an employment contract is terminated, both parties’ obligations towards each other end. A departing employee may take the opportunity to set up a rival firm or join a competitor to improve his terms and conditions of employment. His former employer may regard such a behaviour as unfair competition and may seek legal remedies against him. In order to prevent the former employee from engaging in unwelcoming competition, the employer might enter into a restraint of trade covenant with the employee, which sets out restrictions on time and/or space where the ex-employee cannot participate in any commercial activity similar to that of the employer’s. In both Taiwan and the United Kingdom, there is no statutory provision governing restraint of trade covenants. Base upon the principle of freedom of contract, once an employee voluntarily accepts restriction on his freedom to sell his labour, so long as there is no violation of law, there seems little the judiciary can do to intervene. However, a restraint of trade covenant seriously damages an employee’s opportunity to make a living. In the United Kingdom, after hundreds of years of the accumulation of precedents, the common law has developed the restraint of trade doctrine to tackle and scrutinize the contents of restraint of trade covenants. Its purpose is to safeguard the rights and interests of employees whilst, under strict conditions, to protect the employers’ legitimate proprietary interests. The main theme of this thesis is to explore the development of the restraint of trade doctrine and to discuss its application by the judiciary. This thesis consists of six sections. The first section starts with a brief discussion on the implied duties of employment contracts which is followed by explaining the necessity of restraint of trade covenants and their ensuing issues. Various types of restraint of trade covenants together with their advantages and disadvantages are examined in the second section. In the third section, the focus is on the development of the restraint of trade doctrine by the judiciary which explains the reasons behind judicial intervention and also provides a basis for further discussions. In the fourth section, this thesis tries to explain how the judiciary uses its power of construction and severance skill to trim excessive restrictions or even to render them void. In the fifth section, the conditions upon which a restraint of trade covenant can be justified are discussed in detail. It includes the requirement of consideration, the existence of legitimate proprietary interests as well as area of restriction, duration, and the scope of customers have to be reasonable. In the final section, this thesis emphasizes the necessity of legal intervention on the restraint of trade covenants and briefly describes the attitudes of the courts and the Council of Labour Affairs in Taiwan over restraint of trade covenants.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
郭玲惠(20031000)。勞工保密義務於競業禁止約款之法律意義。萬國法律,131,37-45。
延伸查詢
2.
李建良(20001000)。競業禁止與職業自由。臺灣本土法學雜誌,15,111-118。
延伸查詢
3.
黃越欽(1979)。論勞動契約。政大法學評論,19,45-63。
延伸查詢
4.
林更盛(2003)。離職後競業禁止約款的審查-雇方值得保護的正當利益兼評臺灣高等法院臺中分院九十一年度上字第三六七號判決。月旦民商法雜誌,1,248-254。
延伸查詢
5.
North, Peter(1972)。Breach of Confidence: Is There a New Tort?。Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law,15。
6.
McLean, M.(1990)。Contracts of Employment- Negative Covenants and No Work, No Pay。Cambridge Law Journal,28-28。
7.
Bowers, J.(1983)。Covenants in Restraint of Trade。Law Society Gazette,1268-1268。
8.
Blake, Harlan M.(1960)。Employee Agreements not to Compete。Harvard Law Review,73(4),625-691。
9.
Hull, J.(1988)。Employees' Know-how and Secrecy Covenants。European Intellectual Property Review,387-387。
10.
Jefferson, M.(1990)。Evading the Doctrine of Restraint of Trade。Solicitors' Journal,134,532-532。
11.
Coulthard, A.(1995)。George Michael v. Sony Music - A Challenge to Artistic Freedom?。Manx Law Reports,58,731-731。
12.
Korn, A.(1991)。Losing Staff and Trade Secrets。Solicitors' Journal,135,484-484。
13.
Davies, P. L.(1992)。Post Employment Restraints: Some Recent Developments。Journal of Business Law,490-490。
14.
Smith, S. A.(1995)。Reconstructing Restraint of Trade。Official Journal of the European Union L Series,15,565-565。
15.
Braithwaite, W. J.(1979)。Trade Secrets: The Spring-board Unsprung。Manx Law Reports,42,94-94。
16.
Bradgate, J. R.(1986)。Restraining the Ex-employee。Law Society Gazette,1615-1615。
17.
Jefferson, M.(1991)。Restraint of Trade Update。Solicitors' Journal,135,47-47。
18.
Phillips, J.(1978)。The Construction of Covenants in Restraint of Trade。IJ,13,254-254。
19.
Turner, A.(1976)。The Law Commission's Proposals on Confidential Information。Journal of CIPA,293-293。
20.
Walsh, M.(1995)。Thou Shalt not Covet the Boss's Clients or Employees。New Law Journal,1400-1400。
21.
Bryenton, J. L.(1964)。Validity and Enforceability of Restrictive Covenants not to Compete。Case Western Reserve Law Review,16,161-161。
22.
Carpenter, C. E.(1928)。Validity of Covenants not to Compete。University of Pennsylvania Law Review,76,244-244。
研究報告
1.
陳繼盛(1989)。我國勞動契約法制之研究。
延伸查詢
2.
(1981)。The Law Commission, Breach of Confidence, Report No 10。London, UK。
圖書
1.
鄭玉波(1980)。民商法問題研究(二)。臺北:鄭玉波。
延伸查詢
2.
陳繼盛(1979)。勞資關係。正中書局。
延伸查詢
3.
Atiyah, Patrick S.(1979)。The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract。Oxford:Clarendon Press。
4.
Smith, I. T.、Wood, J. C.(1993)。Industrial Law。Industrial Law。Dublin/ Edinburgh/ London, UK。
5.
Sanderson, W. A.(1926)。Restraint of Trade in English Law。Restraint of Trade in English Law。London, UK。
6.
Gare, F. A.(1935)。The Law Relating to Covenants in Restraint of Trade。The Law Relating to Covenants in Restraint of Trade。London, UK。
7.
Parry, D. H.(1959)。The Sanctity of Contracts in English Law。The Sanctity of Contracts in English Law。London, UK。
8.
Turner, A.(1962)。The Law of Trade Secrets。The Law of Trade Secrets。London, UK。
9.
Turner, A. D.(1968)。The Law of Trade Secrets。The Law of Trade Secrets。London, UK。
10.
Heydon, J. D.(1971)。The Restraint of Trade Doctrine。The Restraint of Trade Doctrine。Oxford, UK。
11.
McComas, W. R.、Davison, M. R.、Gonski, D. M.(1981)。The Protection of Trade Secrets: A General Guide。The Protection of Trade Secrets: A General Guide。Sydney, Australia。
12.
Bell, J.(1983)。Policy Arguments in Judicial Decision。Policy Arguments in Judicial Decision。Oxford, UK。
13.
Gurry, F.(1984)。Breach of Confidence。Breach of Confidence。Oxford, UK。
14.
Reid, B. C.(1986)。Confidentiality and the Law。Confidentiality and the Law。London, UK。
15.
Trebilcock, M. J.(1986)。The Common Law of Restraint of Trade: A Legal and Economic Analysis。The Common Law of Restraint of Trade: A Legal and Economic Analysis。Toronto, Canada。
16.
Brearley, K.、Block, S.(1993)。Employment Covenants and Confidential Information: Law, Practice, and Technique。Employment Covenants and Confidential Information: Law, Practice, and Technique。London, UK。
17.
Dean, R.(1990)。The Law of Trade Secrets。The Law of Trade Secrets。Sydney, Australia。
18.
Mehigan, S.、Griffiths, D.(1991)。Restraint of Trade and Business Secrets: Law and Practice。Restraint of Trade and Business Secrets: Law and Practice。London, UK。
19.
Cripps, Yvonne(1994)。The Legal Implications of Disclosure in the Public Interest。The Legal Implications of Disclosure in the Public Interest。London, UK。
20.
Jefferson, M.(1996)。Restraint of Trade。Restraint of Trade。West Sussex, UK。
21.
王澤鑑(2000)。民法學說與判例研究,第八冊。民法學說與判例研究,第八冊。臺北市。
延伸查詢
22.
Partington, Martin(2000)。Introduction to the English Legal System。Introduction to the English Legal System。Oxford, UK。
23.
魏千峰(1998)。離職後競業禁止契約之研究-評釋臺灣高等法院八十年度臺上字第一四九九號民事判決。勞動法裁判選輯(一)。臺北市。
延伸查詢
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
勞工概念之從屬性判斷基準--以我國實務見解形成、演變及現狀之考察為中心
2.
英國法律對於勞工揭露工作所得資訊的規範
3.
僱用調整目的下勞動契約變動之法律問題探討(下)
4.
僱用調整目的下勞動契約變動之法律問題探討
5.
勞動契約的主要義務與附隨義務之研究
6.
勞動關係中雇主受領勞務遲延之研究
7.
勞動契約訂定階段之相關法律問題
8.
臺灣勞資倫理關係之社會文化脈絡初探
9.
改進我國當前勞資關係之研究--從企業與職業倫理的觀點探討
10.
判斷雇主勞動契約終止有效與否之決定性時點
11.
判斷雇主勞動契約終止有效與否之決定性時點
12.
雇主對離職勞工發給服務證明書之義務
13.
論勞動契約
14.
雇主未為受僱人辦理加入勞工保險之民事責任
無相關博士論文
1.
雇主未為受僱人辦理加入勞工保險之民事責任
無相關著作
1.
引進技術的過程和發展結果:比較臺灣與日本液晶面板產業
2.
澳門地區僱員競業禁止問題探析
3.
訴訟外民事紛爭解決程序中公平合理原則之適用--以金融消費評議事件之運用為中心
4.
歐盟銀行單一清理機制之研究
5.
受託義務之對象
6.
加盟業主先契約資訊揭露義務之建構
7.
法人格否認理論在臺灣與日本勞動法上之運用與發展
8.
論藥品資料專屬保護之不引據義務--以加拿大拜爾案為中心
9.
公司負責人對於公司逃漏稅捐的刑罰與行政罰問題--釋字六八七號後有關犯行參與論的學理續造
10.
金融消費爭議評議決定與法院核可程序之研究
11.
美國Say-on-pay制度介紹與引進可行性之分析
12.
定型化契約條款內容控制的問題導向論證
13.
從民法與公平交易法的規範面向論述締約前資訊揭露義務--兼論丹堤咖啡加盟案
14.
論經濟行政法上之競爭者訴訟
15.
定型化契約之管制與契約自由--德國與我國法制發展之比較分析
QR Code